ADVERTISEMENT

Temporary ban on magazine capacity over 10 rounds and long-barrel semi-automatic weapons

Besides, if he had done anything with his "supermajority" as you claim, your side would have cried that it was rammed down your throat.
Another argument that always bugs me because it's spot on. When they didn't do anything, it's wrong. When they did something, it was wrong.

The other one is the present whining about the sit-in. Yeah, I thought it was pretty ridiculous, but certainly no more so than shutting down the entire government to get at least a little bit of your way when you don't actually have any authority.
 
I'm sure you meant well but once again "your side" messed up. The so-called supermajority that you, and others on here, keep blaming President Obama for not doing anything "meaningful" is factually wrong, especially given the obstructive pledge your party's members took on the night of Obama's first innauguration. I never see you guys mention that though. I wonder why? Besides, if he had done anything with his "supermajority" as you claim, your side would have cried that it was rammed down your throat.

I think this may be about the sixth time I have posted this link. Hopefully it will work THIS TIME to debunk the RW's continual false narrative. smh

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jennifer-m-granholm/debunking-the-myth-obamas_b_1929869.html

Oh, do you mean like Obamacare, which was rammed down our throats and was coated with lies, so it would go down easier? Yeah, in reality, the Dems didn't force through any Gun Control legislation, because they knew there would be a backlash, when it became obvious the new laws would have been just as effective as all the others they've pushed through in the past. Obama is taking care of immigration reform on his own, by merely not enforcing the laws. It's pretty obvious to anyone paying attention.

I always read articles in the Huffington Post, because I know they are always objective and there is absolutely no Liberal bias. smh
 
so you were in favor of "ramming Obamacare down our throats" then, yes?

Hardly. The point is, that when the Dems want something done, they have no qualms about shoving things down our throats, since they know the media will cover for them. If they were really that concerned about firing that "magic" gun control bullet, they would have done it, but they realized it would NOT have made any difference in the number of gun deaths in the country, since the people who have ignored the previous gun laws would continue to do so. Why spend political capital on a losing issue, when you can continue to use it to raise funds for your campaigns (Congressional sit-in is a prime example)?
 
Hardly. The point is, that when the Dems want something done, they have no qualms about shoving things down our throats, since they know the media will cover for them. If they were really that concerned about firing that "magic" gun control bullet, they would have done it, but they realized it would NOT have made any difference in the number of gun deaths in the country, since the people who have ignored the previous gun laws would continue to do so. Why spend political capital on a losing issue, when you can continue to use it to raise funds for your campaigns (Congressional sit-in is a prime example)?
That's a pretty silly "take," hot though it may be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gr8indoorsman
YOU MEAN LIKE THE FAST AND FURIOUS WEAPONS THAT OBAMA GAVE THE PARIS SHOOTERS? OR DO YOU MEAN THE 50 CAL LONG RANGE RIFLES THAT OBAMA GAVE DRUG LORDS IN MEXICO? OH WAIT DO YOU MEAN THE FATHER OF THE ORLANDO SHOOTER WHO RAN FOR PRESIDENT OF AFGHANISTAN AND THAT HILLARY CLINTON HAD HIS SON THE ORLANDO SHOOTER REMOVED FROM TERROR WATCH LISTS? THEY WANT TO DISARM AMERICA BECAUSE THEY WANT ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY OVER YOU TO KILL YOU. ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY THAT THEY CAN NEVER HAVE UNLESS THEY GET AMERICA TO SURRENDER.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT