But again, you deflect what his own coach says about him. Painter has called him one of our best (or the best..I don't specifically remember) post feeder on the team last year. And now you go back on your "over 2 years" to say "period last year against weak competition" - he was injured in late January in the Illinois game. And before the injury against Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Maryland, etc. - he was shooting 43% from 3 just in those Big Ten games leading up to his injury. And it's not like we played some crap non-conference schedule. So to discredit his success simply because they were playing "weak competition" is just not true.
Do I want him to be shooting more than anyone else? I'm pretty sure my previous post said there were shots I didn't think he should take and that he would have cooled off from his shooting a bit quicker. But I guarantee you after he drilled that first 3, Painter was a-ok. Painter has stated multiple times he wants him to keep shooting. And yes, if we're halfway in the season and its still not there, he will probably see his minutes go down some. But to say Ryan Cline will be playing 30 minutes over Stephens is just not true at this point because of the overall skill set that Stephens has and Cline does not have..yet.
If you're going to be constantly critical of a player, at least get your facts straight. When you say things like he only had success against weak competition - and that's not true - it makes you look "anti".