a ukranian russia trained lawyer working at the Brookings Institute, and the kicker, FBI leadership knew it. what does the nyt report? complaints that he was unmasked. you just cannot make this up.
TSB wins again.
TSB wins again.
steele dossier source was
- Thread starter TopSecretBoiler
- Start date
I guess some of the money Russia paid the Clinton foundation made it's way back to Russia.
Unmasking is only OK if the Libs do it. Duh.
Supercut! Reclaiming my time edition.
democrat leadership is such a joke on the national level. hank johnson was the absolute retard who thought guam would tip over like an ice cube floating in his coke if they put too many tanks on it.
Jokes don't deserve the association with Democrat leadership. Today was really something, even for their below basement standards.
Wonder why none of the emotionally unstable yard barkers around here brought up the hearing today? Their heroes looked like complete idiots.
Haha. What a bunch of jackasses.
"Nobody likes me." "Why don't I have a high approval rating?"
-President of the USA today at a COVID-19 pandemic briefing in which 150,000 Americans have died since March.
But yes, a short, spliced Twitter video clip from several hours of a hearing is totally objective.
Not to mention, the head of the Brookings Institute at the time Strobe Talbot, who got involved in the dossier, was a former Clinton Admin person. His brother-in-law, Cody Shearer, distributed his own additional copy. One of the whisteblowers on Trump, Fiona Hill, yeah she was involved with them too.
But no, nothing to see here but Trump conspiracy with Russia and he is treasonous as well. I forget her name now, but during Trump impeachment hearing dealing with Ukraine, and Ambassador to eastern Europe described the dossier as a rabbit hole. That was putting it kindly.
https://justthenews.com/accountabil...n-steeles-primary-source-triggers-focus-think
You guys keep acting like the Steele memos were the centerpiece of something. They weren’t. You guys are being played.
It was the basis for the fbi obtaining a fisa warrant to then spy on American citizens. And it’s now come to light that those obtaining the warrant falsified documents and lied about what was in the dossier to illegally obtain the warrant. But no big deal, nothing to see there. You might want to rethink who you claim is being played
Apparently you are if you think that is “lol”. Please, enlighten me on what about my post is not true?
And this is from CNN, the left’s beloved propaganda machine.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/17/politics/fisa-court-slams-fbi-conduct/index.html
You obviously haven’t been paying attention. What do you think the Durham investigation is based on? Do you even know what that is?
Just in case you missed the first one
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/na...letting-fbi-spy-ex-trump-aide-carter-n1121406
The Durham investigation????
Just what IS the Durham investigation based on????
RW propaganda, or Russian BOT's disinformation?
OK. So, nothing?
LOL! I know exactly what that is.
What are his findings?????
Why hasn't AG Barr acted upon the Durham investigation's findings???
Waiting on an "October Surprise"?
You are one stupid poster.
Come back when you are fully armed. PLEASE!
LOL!
Two of 4 warrants letting FBI spy on ex-Trump aide Carter Page were not valid, says DOJ
So, does that mean the other 2 were valid?
And, is that AG Barr's DOJ making that claim?
You really need to try harder.
lol!
how many investigations release the findings before it’s concluded?
So are you denying the fisa warrants were illegally obtained?
so now you start throwing insults?
Typical
Calm down, Cainer. We don’t know much about the Durham investigation because it’s not finished yet. And we don’t know much about it because it’s not being run by Democrats. If it were run by Democrats, “details“ of it would be leaked all over the place and Durham would be hoisted up as a mythical figure/hero just like Mueller was.
There were plenty of abuses associated with Russia!, the FBI’s handling of investigations, how FISA warrants were obtained, etc. Durham is supposedly and apolitical so nobody really knows what will happen.
Again, Democrats aren’t running the show here so that’s the reason why nobody knows much. Those lunatics can’t keep their mouths shut to save their lives. This could end up being something or nothing. But somebody thought there was enough shadiness going on to prompt an investigation so there’s an investigation happening.
No reason to fly off the handle and call him a “stupid poster.”
Insults?
I truly apologize. I didn't know I was dealing with a snowflake.
LOL!
I see you have your lapdog atlboiler in tow.
You guys related?????
LOL
I thought he might be more concerned in how his White Sox just plain suck.
Need to get more pitching. Maybe the Cubs can trade Quintana back?
Last edited:
I'm sorry if I pounded on "you".
Come on man. It's kind of obvious.
I am anxiously waiting on Durham's investigation. I just hope it doesn't come out in October, kind of like Comey's statement on Hillary's investigation did.
You agree with that, right?
oh good the bots are here to tell us how it REALLY went down! haha stfu you haven't been right in 4 years.
All good. I think everybody would agree with that! The sooner, the better on it wrapping up but it has been interesting that it's been going on for quite some time and nobody knows anything. Again, it could be a complete bust or things could happen. Who knows?I'm sorry if I pounded on "you".
Come on man. It's kind of obvious.
I am anxiously waiting on Durham's investigation. I just hope it doesn't come out in October, kind of like Comey's statement on Hillary's investigation did.
You agree with that, right?
It's just refreshing to not see the NYT or WaPo running with whatever Democrat leakers tell them to leak. Adults seem to be handling this investigation and everybody has been pretty tight lipped.
All we know is that it's ongoing and nobody knows when it will wrap up. We shall see...
indictments inbound, you might as well start bunching your panties up now.I'm sorry if I pounded on "you".
Come on man. It's kind of obvious.
I am anxiously waiting on Durham's investigation. I just hope it doesn't come out in October, kind of like Comey's statement on Hillary's investigation did.
You agree with that, right?
This is your buddy atlboiler, not jcrist. We can chalk this up as a senior moment
The Durham investigation is not trying to determine if the fisa warrants were illegally obtained or not, that has been proven true. The fisa court would not have put out a formal statement regarding the false pretenses if not true. The Durham investigation is looking into how far up the chain this went and who all knew about the exculpatory evidence that was ignored. So like I said previously, the Durham investigation is “based” on the procurement of warrants with false information. Time will tell what the investigation does/doesn’t uncover, which I never commented on one way or the other.
And snowflake? How original
If you say so.This is your buddy atlboiler, not jcrist. We can chalk this up as a senior moment
The Durham investigation is a criminal investigation involving transgressions within the FBI.
The investigation is determining who told who to do what.
There are high ranking Obama cabinet members being subpoenaed.
