If the point is that he would be facing a rebuild I agree. I have no visibility to the quality of the younger players he’s brought in as to your point, he played one of the oldest teams in the country this year. Easier to rebuild in the portal era but a big ask regardless.Okay I'll tray again.
He coached a team that was a 10 seed in the NCAA tournament (meaning 36-40th seeded team overall) whose 5 leading scorers where seniors and has nobody returning next year that averaged over 4 points per game.
Is that better?
If your argument is that he wasn’t that successful by Penn State standards I strongly disagree.
Last edited: