Select committee facts

[Riveting-]

Does it matter?

If they are black, I will not shoot for otherwise I will be hounded and prosecuted to death by the regime media and our corrupt Justice Dept.

If white, I will blow him away and become a hero, possibly even an msnbc commentator.

 

[BuilderBob6]

If my neighbor saw me (or had it on video) calling out to crowds, "let's go this way, I'll sell you drugs," I would expect him to call the cops.

Lol. Well Ray wasn't saying anything like that either.

The point is your evidence sucks. You're making this massive assumption about the FBI on what one man said, and even then you have to make assumptions about what he was saying and why.

If you're gonna ignore the testimony of a trump supporter about what Epps said then just go away. You're not a serious person, pretending that which negates your conspiracy theory doesn't exist. You're a joke. It's so pathetic that you ignore testimony, video and facts but continue to act as though your completely unproven BS is relevant.

 

[BuilderBob6]

The NYT reporter who said there were a ton of FBI informants at the event.

Even more, I would trust an FBI executive testifying under oath that the FBI was not involved. Wouldn't you? That would make it pretty simple all the way around, right? Let me know when that testimony is scheduled so I can watch it (but not with you and puf).

Again, be pretty simple for you to testify in court that you weren't selling drugs. What's wrong with making you prove yourself innocent, prove you didn't do what you were accused of with no evidence? That's what you want the FBI to do. Prove they didn't incite the riot to people like you.......who still wouldn't believe them. You'll just make up another lie or conspiracy. When they say they can't comment on a case you say AHAH......when that's policy for them to say.

Funny how you don't believe conspiracy theories that go against your political bent.

How about this one?

 

[Joetboiler]

Good gracious, what difference does it make. The Capitol and metro cops got the crap beat out of them. The deplorables are lucky only one woman was shot. The Capitol police showed tremendous restrait. And I wonder why.

Did the Chicago police show great restraint? A coordinated attack. projectiles, explosives, spears. All on film. Should I tell you who organized this? I think you can read the banners. But Ahhhh you probably didn't know about this. Nothing to see here. It's all just peaceful protests. 49 police officers injured. One blinded. 12 arrests made. To my knowledge none served any time. Why would they. They are leftist and they do the bidding of the progressive leaders so they instead are celebrated - which is what some Chicago Alderman did. Kimm Foxx probably called them an Uber.

 

[bonefish1]

That is an intellectually insufficient question. Why would police shoot someone looting stores? Their lives aren’t in danger. Even though blacks have been shot for less.

If someone were looting my store, I'd shoot their ass. Castle doctrine.
When you decide to loot, you give up your rights to not paying the consequences of that criminal behavior.

 

[BNIBoiler]

If someone were looting my store, I'd shoot their ass. Castle doctrine.
When you decide to loot, you give up your rights to not paying the consequences of that criminal behavior.

I’ll take your word. You may have the right. I will do the same if it’s legal. However, the issue he posed that the cops should be shooting these looters. I’m pretty sure cops can’t just shoot looters unless they have weapons and the cop feels that his life is in danger.

 

[bonefish1]

I’ll take your word. You may have the right. I will do the same if it’s legal. However, the issue he posed that the cops should be shooting these looters. I’m pretty sure cops can’t just shoot looters unless they have weapons and the cop feels that his life is in danger.

I don't know the law well enough to know whether a cop can shoot a looter or not. Can't a cop just say "I thought he had a gun" and that would justify it.
The bottom line is, don't be an opportunist and loot, then you won't have to worry about getting shot.

 

[TheGunner]

As much as Bob and Democrats want to scream about Jan 6, I believe it is a telling statement that more Americans would vote for Trump today, than Biden.

Yes, Bob, only true blue Democrats care about J6.

From the link below…
The survey of 1,541 U.S. adults, which was conducted from June 10-13, found that if another presidential election were held today, more registered voters say they would cast ballots for Donald Trump (44%) than for Biden (42%) — even though the House Jan. 6 committee has spent the last week linking Trump to what it called a “seditious conspiracy” to overturn the 2020 election and laying the groundwork for possible criminal prosecution.

Poll: Biden disapproval hits new high as more Americans say they would vote for Trump

As inflation keeps rising and recession fears loom, a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll shows that Joe Biden is currently in the worst shape of his presidency.

news.yahoo.com

 

[SKYDOG]

I’ll take your word. You may have the right. I will do the same if it’s legal. However, the issue he posed that the cops should be shooting these looters. I’m pretty sure cops can’t just shoot looters unless they have weapons and the cop feels that his life is in danger.

I wonder about store owners or homeowners. If people come in your store and steal merchandise or cash and or rob your home can one shoot them weapon or not?

 

[BNIBoiler]

I wonder about store owners or homeowners. If people come in your store and steal merchandise or cash and or rob your home can one shoot them weapon or not?

Depends on the state laws. I know in some states you can't shoot someone in the back.

 

[Riveting-]

Lol. Well Ray wasn't saying anything like that either.

The point is your evidence sucks. You're making this massive assumption about the FBI on what one man said, and even then you have to make assumptions about what he was saying and why.

My assumption re the FBI is based on its sordid history of corruption - including recent history like the Whitmer kidnapping and the Russian collusion hoax. It is not "my evidence", it is the evidence from those cases and many more. Are you denying the FBI's history of corruption?

If you're gonna ignore the testimony of a trump supporter about what Epps said then just go away. You're not a serious person, pretending that which negates your conspiracy theory doesn't exist. You're a joke. It's so pathetic that you ignore testimony, video and facts but continue to act as though your completely unproven BS is relevant.

I saw on video what Epps said on Jan 5 and 6. If you are talking about Epp's testimony, I haven't read it. Have you?

 

[Riveting-]

Again, be pretty simple for you to testify in court that you weren't selling drugs. What's wrong with making you prove yourself innocent, prove you didn't do what you were accused of with no evidence? That's what you want the FBI to do. Prove they didn't incite the riot to people like you.......who still wouldn't believe them.

What I want the FBI to do is testify. Don't you? You keep ducking that question.

Are you against the FBI explaining its involvement? You think they are above the law and shouldn't have to report to the citizens by way of our elected reps?

You'll just make up another lie or conspiracy. When they say they can't comment on a case you say AHAH......when that's policy for them to say.

Are you saying it is policy that the FBI does not report its activities to our elected reps - that it operates autonomously. If so, you make a good little police state fascist.

Funny how you don't believe conspiracy theories that go against your political bent.

You mean like the Russian collusion conspiracy? No, I didn't believe that one, but I think you and many other mindless progs did - and some still do despite Mueller.

How about this one?

View embedded media

How about it? Investigate them.

The underlying problem with this entire case is that the people doing the investigating - the partisan hack committee and the FBI - have proven themselves to be corrupt in the past, including the recent past. Do you trust them despite that history of corruption - or will you keep pretending like that question doesn't exist.

 

[TopSecretBoiler]

Colbert incited an insurrection today.

 

[SKYDOG]

Colbert incited an insurrection today.

He’s a Democrat so no harm done.