WTF are you talking about? How am I racist? You should be banned for constantly throwing around the racism label like they're skittles.
POS President Chump blames DEI for plane crash
- Thread starter BNIBoiler
- Start date
when you only have a hammer in your tool box, everything looks like a nail...
No, your interests are in deflecting away from anything that diminishes or destroys any and all of your arguments, including but not limited to, calling people that make you look like a fool a racist.
Grossly untrue? Did you even read the article? Did you even look up the MULTIPLE passages in the NEW TESTAMENT that endorses slavery? Or are you just going off of what you're told? I know the answer because it's your MO.
Ephesians 6:5-9
Slaves and Masters
5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect[a] and trembling, in singleness of heart, as you obey Christ, 6 not with a slavery performed merely for looks, to please people, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the soul. 7 Render service with enthusiasm, as for the Lord and not for humans, 8 knowing that whatever good we do, we will receive the same again from the Lord, whether we are enslaved or free.9 And, masters,[b] do the same to them. Stop threatening them, for you know that both of you have the same Lord[c] in heaven, and with him there is no partiality.
----------------------------------------------------------
Colossians 3:22-4:1
22 Slaves, obey your earthly masters[a] in everything, not with a slavery performed merely for looks, to please people, but wholeheartedly, fearing the Lord.[b] 23 Whatever task you must do, work as if your soul depends on it, as for the Lord and not for humans, 24 since you know that from the Lord you will receive the inheritance as your reward; you serve the Lord Christ. 25 For the wrongdoer will be paid back for whatever wrong has been done, and there is no partiality. 4 1 Masters, treat your slaves justly and fairly, for you know that you also have a Master in heaven.
-----------------------------------------------------------
1 Timothy 6:1-2
6 Let all who are under the yoke of slavery regard their masters as worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and the teaching may not be blasphemed. 2 Those who have believing masters must not be disrespectful to them on the ground that they are brothers and sisters; rather, they must serve them all the more, since those who benefit by their service are believers and beloved.[a]
------------------------------------------------------------
Titus 2:9-10
9 Urge slaves to be submissive to their masters in everything, to be pleasing, not talking back, 10 not stealing, but showing complete and perfect fidelity, so that in everything they may be an ornament to the teaching of God our Savior.
------------------------------------------------------------
1 Peter 2:18-20
The Example of Christ’s Suffering
18 Slaves, be subject to your masters with all respect,[a] not only those who are good and gentle but also those who are dishonest. 19 For it is a commendable thing if, being aware of God, a person endures pain while suffering unjustly. 20 If you endure when you are beaten for doing wrong, what credit is that? But if you endure when you do good and suffer for it, this is a commendable thing before God.
You are the one that does not understand. I never said, nor implied that slavery only occurred in the US. I know about slavery worldwide historically and currently. I've said that I focus on US slavery because, duh I live here plus I have ancestors that were enslaved here in the US.
Maybe BNI could move to Gaza? Nope; Trump plans to remove all non-whites from Gaza. Would just have to move again.
Maybe Greenland, Panama, or Canada! President "Dumb-Ass No One Believes" has stated that he is open to invading those countries with US Troops. Can't go there, if Trump gets his way they'll be bloody messes and US states, and then he'd just have to move again.
Best to move to a "shithole country" full of non-white people where Trump has no interest. Hey @BNIBoiler... seems as though @BoilerJS wants you in Haiti! Or at least if you want to be an American you'll need to adjust to the standard of "speak freely about government? You're evicted!"
That's the go to response of racists towards people of color, not colored, is to just move to another country.
Which party had those slaves?
Which party nearly destroyed the Native Americans and caused the Trail of Tears?
Which party implemented Jim Crow?
Which party started the KKK that killed all those people?
Which party put Japanese into internment camps?
Sadly, your answer that will first pop in your confused mind will be "but but but there was a big switch" BULLSHIT. No there wasn't. That's what the party says that knows it's done all of these evils but needs to say relevant somehow. Sadly, a lot of people bought that bullshit.
The Republican party was founded as a freedom party. Freedom for the slaves. The Republican party today is the freedom party. Freedom from the tyranny's of the federal government. The Republican party is for equality for all (as a whole, don't come at me with stupid one off examples when the examples are legion to the opposite).
Both heterosexuals and homosexuals can procreate. Just need one man and one woman, or an intermediary lab.
Do we need to explain this to you? If your middle school hasn't covered this yet we can use illustrations:
Last edited:
If the Republican Party was the so called freedom party then why did Pres. Lincoln didn't like black people.
5 Things You May Not Know About Abraham Lincoln, Slavery and Emancipation | HISTORY
The 16th U.S. president was firm in believing slavery was morally wrong, but his views on racial equality were sometimes more complicated.
www.history.com
Yes, there was a switch since the 60sand you cannot deny that all of the white supremacist groups including the KKK, Oath Keepers, Proud Boys support the republican party.
Since the 60s you cannot deny that the republican party has a horrible civil rights voting record.
Since the 60s you cannot deny that the republicans have been a enemy to affirmative action.
If the republican party is not racist, then why are the getting rid of anything that has to do with DEI?
If it's all about merit based now, why didn't Chump select Bondi for AG over Goetz in the first place. She is 10 times more qualified for AG tan Goetz ever was.
True, but I still am not able to reconcile the summation of the law in Galatians with slavery, and I am not aware of anyone who can.
I don't want BNI banned. I enjoy him too much. Plus, he's the voice of Black America and we're fortunate to have him on the forum.
I'm not up to date with the non-white part. Was Trump endorsing leaving the whites in Gaza as you imply or did you forget that part?
Urban radio baby...victimhood! I wish he were more happy and never saw everything through racism, but understood teh vices and virtues that have been with man since the beginning of time and viewed the general shortcoming of man...those right in front of him in the party he has always voted to advance.
He proposed moving out the 2,000,000 (not white) people currently there and turning it into a fancy beach resort.
The real takeaway? As usual he is full of shit and everyone, including the political players, knows it. If anyone took him seriously the cease fire would already be cancelled.
It's kind of like the tariff threats; the markets reacted some, but not too much because anyone with sense built into the equation that he was bluffing and speaking out of his ass like usual, and that Canada and Mexico would make some fake concession to do something they were already doing, allowing Trump to save face and speak of victory to his really stupid lemmings.
I don't care where he goes, nor did I request him leaving.
But life is to short to be so unhappy.
Maybe another Country would make him happier.
His words mean nothing. You should only care about what he does.
Except when he does what he says. That's fulfilling promises.
So does the non white have anything to do with cleaning up the area? Was he leaving only whites there...or is the racial part not a factor?
That's what makes Trump Trump. He does what he says and everything he does is in the best interest of the American people or our allies.
It’s Gaza. No Jews allowed. No Christians allowed. It’s a hell hole governed by terrorists. They all kinda look the same because others aren’t really welcome or allowed.
Dude, not liking someone doesn't mean you don't believe they deserve freedom. You do understand that right? His views of blacks needs to be viewed from the lens of his time. I'm sure all of our views would be different if we lived back then.If the Republican Party was the so called freedom party then why did Pres. Lincoln didn't like black people.
5 Things You May Not Know About Abraham Lincoln, Slavery and Emancipation | HISTORY
The 16th U.S. president was firm in believing slavery was morally wrong, but his views on racial equality were sometimes more complicated.
Lincoln still believed they deserved to be free, and look where we are today.
I can 100% deny there was a switch because it's not true. The switch narrative is nothing but propaganda. As the south became less racist it became more Republican. That's just a fact. Groups like the KKK that are hate groups have extremely small memberships. They are on their dying breath. With that said, if neither party are espousing your values of hate anymore, where are you going to land? You're going to land with whatever party lines up with your economic values. The Republican party does not and will not embrace the hatred those groups represent. The Democratic party knows this but they use those groups support as propaganda to make people like you believe that racism is alive and well in the party that fought to end it. WAKE UP! The Democrats are not your friends and never will be. The Republican party wishes hate groups will die and go away. They have no control over who gives them support.
BTW, Richard Spencer supported Kamala and David Duke supported Jill Stein in this last election (Spancer endorsed Biden in the one before this). So, where is your hand wringing over these KKK leaders supporting Democrats? Oh right, the propaganda machine hasn't told you to.
Wrong. Any time they have voted against any kind of "civil rights" bill, it had to do with either 1. the bill had pork on it they just could not back or 2. the bill would have violated the Constitution in some way. That doesn't mean they didn't believe in what the bill stood for, but we don't live in a vacuum. You cannot say people are against something when you don't know the context behind their vote against it.
I've read you rail on and on about Goldwater and how you call him a racist for how he voted on a civil rights bill, but if you took the time to look, you would see that Goldwater wanted the outcomes of that civil rights bill, however he feared that other people's Constitutional rights would have been violated based on how the bill was worded. I've pointed this out to you with links and everything, but you never read what I link for you. In fact, Goldwater voted FOR many of the other civil rights bills, but this is how Democrats use propaganda. They see an R vote against something and use that to slander the R's without the context behind it.
Correct, but only because Republicans have noticed that AA had a net negative effect. The R's believe in equality and AA did not align with that belief. Has nothing to do with racism as you're told to believe.
Getting rid of DEI is not a racist thing you dipshit. DEI means "didn't earn it." Do you think black people are unable to earn anything? Do you think that they must be handed things? Again, this is propaganda thinking that has you in a tizzy over this. The R party believes in merit. If you earn it, you deserve it and nobody can take that away from you. Talking with my black friends, they grew up in R districts and they all have amazing jobs and are very sucessful. Why is it that only blacks in D territories need DEI to succeed?
You need to look at the Democrats and their policies to understand why DEI was ever needed in the first place.
What in your mind made Goetz not qualified for the job? Sure, Bondi is great for the position, but how do you know Goetz wouldn't have been just as good? I sense more propaganda comming on.
Last edited:
Perhaps you can summarize for me how you think it doesn't reconcile with it, because I'm not seeing a problem here.
So Trump using leverage to get people to do what they want is him talking out of his ass? If people didn't think he'd do it, then why are thy caving?
Seeing history from one side and with 20th century eyes can lead to a LOT of misunderstandings. Sadly, your efforts and mine are not absorbed...
I really and truly am all for him bloviating and bluffing to get people to do what he wants for the betterment of the USA. The bloviating and bluffing clearly works on you - you voted for him. It clearly worked with the J6 insurrectionists - he reinforced and restated this 'deep-state' bullshit for five years and got them to storm the freaking Capitol.
But to say with a straight face that he 'got what he wanted' from Canada and Mexico when all they had to do was re-state their already in-place initiatives from the Biden era (no, I'm not saying because of Biden) is flat-out silly, and shows that you believe his victory proclamations against all objective evidence.
Last edited:
FFS. I just started to read the link from this post you gave. Figures the History channel would get the three fifths clause wrong. They even said the founders and thus the Constitution "sanctioned" slavery which is also just flat out wrong.If the Republican Party was the so called freedom party then why did Pres. Lincoln didn't like black people.
5 Things You May Not Know About Abraham Lincoln, Slavery and Emancipation | HISTORY
The 16th U.S. president was firm in believing slavery was morally wrong, but his views on racial equality were sometimes more complicated.
Yes, there was a switch since the 60sand you cannot deny that all of the white supremacist groups including the KKK, Oath Keepers, Proud Boys support the republican party.
Since the 60s you cannot deny that the republican party has a horrible civil rights voting record.
Since the 60s you cannot deny that the republicans have been a enemy to affirmative action.
If the republican party is not racist, then why are the getting rid of anything that has to do with DEI?
If it's all about merit based now, why didn't Chump select Bondi for AG over Goetz in the first place. She is 10 times more qualified for AG tan Goetz ever was.
One thing I do find hilarious though, in the very link you gave to somehow prove that Lincoln didn't like black people, it states very clearly that he did want to get rid of slavery. Which was my original argument. That the Republican party is the party of freedom.
"In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system."
Last edited:
Because I don't need one. Reality will go on without you.
Another non-answer. Why disagree with a fact-based post with "Trust me, bro?" Just shut your damn mouth if you've got nothing to say of substance. Or go ahead and keep being you.
Their already in-place initiatives from the Biden era AFTER TRUMP WAS ELECTED.
Excellent response!
If the threat is a bluff but that threat alone helps lower illegal immigration? Then that's a good thing.
Curious for the people reading this if there is any comparable with Canada - I don't see anything.
Last edited:
Of course. But here's the really hard part: Can you get this into BB62's head?
I speak for myself. I agree with plenty of what some other posters say, but that doesn't mean I don't think for myself.
