ADVERTISEMENT

Political genius

BuilderBob6

BuilderBob6

All-American
Jan 27, 2007
12,985
13,663
113
62
North Carolina
Brilliant strategy to bring the party together and raise funds for his legal fees.

“Anybody that makes a ‘Contribution’ to Birdbrain, from this moment forth, will be permanently barred from the MAGA camp,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social website. “We don’t want them, and will not accept them.”

Haley rakes in campaign cash after Trump warned her donors would be 'barred' from MAGA | Fox News

Nikki Haley heads to New York City for a fundraiser with top GOP donors after hauling in $1 million after her second-place finish to Donald Trump in New Hampshire's Republican presidential primary.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
Haley's toast. One million is nothing in a Presidential campaign. When she finished 3rd in Iowa and didn't win NH, the stars aligned and the Haley bus headed out of town.

As much as you hate to hear this, DJT will be your next President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
TwinDegrees2 said:
Haley's toast. One million is nothing in a Presidential campaign. When she finished 3rd in Iowa and didn't win NH, the stars aligned and the Haley bus headed out of town.

As much as you hate to hear this, DJT will be your next President.
Click to expand...
If he is, he will be $83.3 million poorer. And his fat orange, jury-decided sexual abuser head will explode.

HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
 
HoosierfanJM said:
If he is, he will be $83.3 million poorer. And his fat orange, jury-decided sexual abuser head will explode.

HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Click to expand...
You are smarter than your post....I hope. Bullshit trial, bullshit witness who was coached and coerced. She will settle for a few million and it will all go away. And she can go gargle some Listerine to get the taste out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cinboiler and Boilermaker03
TwinDegrees2 said:
You are smarter than your post....I hope. Bullshit trial, bullshit witness who was coached and coerced. She will settle for a few million and it will all go away. And she can go gargle some Listerine to get the taste out.
Click to expand...
Because what happens in a court of law with rules of evidence doesn’t matter, but what Trump rages about does? For Trump to settle for a few million he will have to admit that he defamed her. Trump admits that he was in the wrong?

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
 
HoosierfanJM said:
Because what happens in a court of law with rules of evidence doesn’t matter, but what Trump rages about does? For Trump to settle for a few million he will have to admit that he defamed her. Trump admits that he was in the wrong?

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Click to expand...
Then it will drag out for longer than she's alive. You know how that works....right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
TwinDegrees2 said:
You are smarter than your post....I hope. Bullshit trial, bullshit witness who was coached and coerced. She will settle for a few million and it will all go away. And she can go gargle some Listerine to get the taste out.
Click to expand...
The judge hated trump. The jury hated trump. The court stenographer hated trump. The bailiffs hated trump. The janitor hated trump. They all conspired against him.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: herrli, Boilermaker03 and Mr_Scott
BuilderBob6 said:
The judge hated trump. The jury hated trump. The court stenographer hated trump. The bailiffs hated trump. The janitor hated trump. They all conspired against him.
Click to expand...
So. Much. Winning. Can't wait to see the fraud penalty.
 
SIBoiler2 said:
Hey, aren't baseless and endless appeals what lawyers pray for every night?
Click to expand...
If they lose? 100%. Keeps the meter running.

If they win a civil suit? No sir.

By the way, I wonder if his ability to pay will conflict with his NY trial assertion that he hasn’t overstated his assets? He claims to be a gazillion-aire. Oughta be able to afford $83.3 million like it’s pocket change.
 
HoosierfanJM said:
If he is, he will be $83.3 million poorer. And his fat orange, jury-decided sexual abuser head will explode.

HAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Click to expand...
It seems pretty ridiculous to have this lawsuit 28 years after it supposedly occurred. She must have not been to hurt back in 1997.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
SKYDOG said:
It seems pretty ridiculous to have this lawsuit 28 years after it supposedly occurred. She must have not been to hurt back in 1997.
Click to expand...
So you have a problem with the legislature and their lengthy statute of limitations for civil suits.

For what it’s worth, the ability to prevail in a civil suit based on long ago actions is infinitely harder. A trial jury heard the entirety of admissible evidence and found in favor of the plaintiff. I didn’t hear nor determine the veracity of that evidence, and neither did you.

Trump could have testified during that civil suit, but then he would’ve been subject to cross examination. He chose not to testify, which is his prerogative. Instead, he chose to testify after the judgment for the plaintiff during the damages portion, primarily to complain about the trial he didn’t testify in, and to make political statements. in doing so it seems clear that he massively pissed off the jury and will now pay the price.
 
HoosierfanJM said:
So you have a problem with the legislature and their lengthy statute of limitations for civil suits.

For what it’s worth, the ability to prevail in a civil suit based on long ago actions is infinitely harder. A trial jury heard the entirety of admissible evidence and found in favor of the plaintiff. I didn’t hear nor determine the veracity of that evidence, and neither did you.

Trump could have testified during that civil suit, but then he would’ve been subject to cross examination. He chose not to testify, which is his prerogative. Instead, he chose to testify after the judgment for the plaintiff during the damages portion, primarily to complain about the trial he didn’t testify in, and to make political statements. in doing so it seems clear that he massively pissed off the jury and will now pay the price.
Click to expand...
I have a problem with this as why didn’t she sue him decades ago. If he was guilty of this in 1996 then take him to court. Now since many hate Trump’s guts she got a favorable ruling. Looking at it with an open mind which many people can’t, it seems like a crock of crap to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjreese, cinboiler and Boilermaker03
SKYDOG said:
I have a problem with this as why didn’t she sue him decades ago. If he was guilty of this in 1996 then take him to court. Now since many hate Trump’s guts she got a favorable ruling. Looking at it with an open mind which many people can’t, it seems like a crock of crap to me.
Click to expand...
Or because the evidence supported the suit she got a favorable ruling. Believe it or not, most people respect the rule of law and the courtroom instructions and weight evidence fairly.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
HoosierfanJM said:
A guilty verdict would have had to come within five years of an overt act.

It was a civil suit-he was adjudged liable for his sexual assault. No deprivation of freedom = less statute of limitations restrictions.
Click to expand...
Ok, but waiting so long makes no sense to me. Her life would have been so much more enriched had this been done decades ago. It’s probably not about the money, but another hit on Trump during his campaign.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinDegrees2 and Boilermaker03
SKYDOG said:
Ok, but waiting so long makes no sense to me. Her life would have been so much more enriched had this been done decades ago. It’s probably not about the money, but another hit on Trump during his campaign.
Click to expand...
Sure—it’s way harder to prove with time. But it’s possible and happens as with the Catholic Church suits.
 
HoosierfanJM said:
Or because the evidence supported the suit she got a favorable ruling. Believe it or not, most people respect the rule of law and the courtroom instructions and weight evidence fairly.
Click to expand...
@BuilderBob6 That may be, but it's VERY easy to sway a jury if there is pertinent evidence that gets left out.

Makes me think of a Netflix story I saw called American Nightmare. A couple had their lives turned upside down when someone broke into their house and kidnapped her. Then she showed up days later at her parents house. The police AND FBI didn't believe their story, so they were going to prosecute them. If it wasn't for the good work of another police officer in a different area, their case wouldn't have been solved and they would have been wrongfully federally charged and convicted.

That type of shit happens more than you think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: herrli
HoosierfanJM said:
A guilty verdict would have had to come within five years of an overt act.

It was a civil suit-he was adjudged liable for his sexual assault. No deprivation of freedom = less statute of limitations restrictions.
Click to expand...
That doesn't answer the question. Why wasn't this case brought decades earlier?
 
Boilermaker03 said:
That doesn't answer the question. Why wasn't this case brought decades earlier?
Click to expand...
Thanks Mr. defense attorney. Pretty sure that was a key point by Trump’s defense, but of course he’s such a dumb ass that he preferred a hot looking attorney to a competent one.

What signal did THAT send to the jury! Lol
 
HoosierfanJM said:
Thanks Mr. defense attorney. Pretty sure that was a key point by Trump’s defense, but of course he’s such a dumb ass that he preferred a hot looking attorney to a competent one.

What signal did THAT send to the jury! Lol
Click to expand...
I see that you can't or refuse answer the question and go back to deflecting with childish sentiment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwinDegrees2
And then during the damages phase when him and his attorney act like the rules of the court, decorum, and general human decency shouldn’t apply to him? What an arrogant loser.
 
Boilermaker03 said:
I see that you can't or refuse answer the question and go back to deflecting with childish sentiment.
Click to expand...
Because victims aren’t always okay with admitting that a very powerful, very wealthy man pinned them against a wall and stuffed his fat fingers into her vagina against her will.
 
Boilermaker03 said:
OR you hate someone so much that you are willing to do anything to ruin them, ala Brett Kavanaugh.
Click to expand...
That’s why there’s a trial!

And yes, victims of sexual assault tend to really hate men that pin them against a wall and shove their fingers into their vagina.
 
BuilderBob6 said:
The judge hated trump. The jury hated trump. The court stenographer hated trump. The bailiffs hated trump. The janitor hated trump. They all conspired against him.
Click to expand...
This post is a joke and over the top sarcasm at how trumpers believe any accusations or criticisms of trump are based on malice and have nothing to do with the truth. And yet you liked the post @Boilermaker03 ……..and it wasn’t for the sarcasm. It’s true for you. Unbelievable.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: rezzerfly, herrli and HoosierfanJM
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
BuilderBob6 said:
This post is a joke and over the top sarcasm at how trumpers believe any accusations or criticisms of trump are based on malice and have nothing to do with the truth. And yet you liked the post @Boilermaker03 ……..and it wasn’t for the sarcasm. It’s true for you. Unbelievable.
Click to expand...
What's unbelievable is that you are unable to see that our Justice system isn't blind. In fact it's far from blind. Politics are very much involved, especially in certain areas of the country. It's unbelievable to me that you and @HoosierfanJM are so eager to see someone go down with NO evidence, simply because you've been conditioned to hate the man.

We have example after example after example of FAKED hate crimes by the left. Yet, you just want to find it to be true so badly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
SKYDOG said:
Afraid he would have her disappear. Yeah right! Now it’s safe to prosecute Trump. Take the money and run. Be safe
Click to expand...
Not that he would have done it, but Trump in the 80’s and 90’s was in so deep with NYC mob guys who knows what message she got.
 
HoosierfanJM said:
Not that he would have done it, but Trump in the 80’s and 90’s was in so deep with NYC mob guys who knows what message she got.
Click to expand...
There's no evidence of this. Did he use businesses for projects that had connections with the mob. I have no doubt, but to say that he was in deep with the mob is just patently false.
 
Boilermaker03 said:
There's no evidence of this. Did he use businesses for projects that had connections with the mob. I have no doubt, but to say that he was in deep with the mob is just patently false.
Click to expand...
Trump has pretty much said so during his interviews with Howard Stern back in the day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

tjreese

This can't be true or we would have heard about it on CNN, MSNBC, CBS and ABC or other media. Besides,

Replies
14
Views
2K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
typeviic
typeviic
Y

Biden's blunder on Nov 10, 2021, started the Russia-Ukraine War

Replies
0
Views
1K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
YouSayPotato
Y
PA Boilermakers

Our Brave New Biden World

Replies
19
Views
1K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
Riveting
Riveting
TwinDegrees2

CORRECT THE RECORD: FACT CHECKING BIDEN AT THE FINAL DEBATE

Replies
0
Views
2K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
TwinDegrees2
TwinDegrees2
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back