Wait, you mean people who work for the Catholic Church abuse kids? I'm shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you!
One Really Violent Day
- Thread starter Katscratch
- Start date
Mumbling incoherently to yourself again, KatJM23?
Quit spending so much time hanging out with trans people and get some help.
Repeat offenders don't deserve due process. They deserve a lesson learnt the hard way.
Let me guess... You asked your children if they felt like a boy or a girl?
Are you encouraging your kids to major in gender studies?
Yeh, Catholic school instill discipline. You learn quickly where the boundaries are. I sorry that you were brought up believing that reasoning with children is how you change behavior (it's not).
Well, at least you're consistent about being at odds with what the science says.
And the whole due process thing including innocent until proven guilty. Oh, and criminals can't be rehabilitated. Also "tuning up" suspects is a good thing. And then there's the "make Gaza a parking lot" style of diplomacy. He's very enlightened.
You claim to read WSJ, but did you just mean the cartoon on the editorial page?
Or this guy, who apparently wandered on to the stage in a vp debate last night, providing some great comedy material.
reason.com
VP Candidate Tim Walz on "There's No Guarantee to Free Speech on Misinformation or Hate Speech, and Especially Around Our Democracy"
Robby Soave at Reason writes about this 2022 quote from Walz (MSNBC): https://youtu.be/y8ns76RCmWs : … I want to talk about what you just mentioned
reason.com
Last edited:
How in the hell does this say dictator? Dumb comment, but you're really reaching here.
That would be great if there weren't leftist DA's that will just let them go and not prosecute.
I don't give a rat's behind if they are left, right, up, down, or upside down. If a DA's office is lazy or incompetent, that is terrible.
Nancy Pelosi blasted over statement that Trump can "prove innocence"
Republican Senator Ted Cruz described the former speaker's comments as a "mockery of our justice system."
www.newsweek.com
True-well stated; it doesn't indicate "dictator." Like you said, it does indicate "dumb" and also indicates misguided priorities.
1. No one in the history of American jurisprudence has needed to prove their innocence.Nancy Pelosi blasted over statement that Trump can "prove innocence"
Republican Senator Ted Cruz described the former speaker's comments as a "mockery of our justice system."
2. No one in the history of American jurisprudence has been "found innocent" at trial.
3. Thank God almighty Nancy Pelosi is not a court room judge or juror.
Agree, that is terrible (something else you may have missed in WSJ).
No. I'm against people who constantly break the law.
I would very much be in favor of a 3 strikes rule, but I bet that the liberals would call it unconstitutional so come up with some other way it infringes on peoples rights.
Let me guess.....some lefty lib social behaviorist thinks the spanking a child is abuse? Shocker.
Keep in mind, there's a difference between spanking (getting the hand, paddle, spoon, belt, switch, etc) and beating. I don't believe in injuring a child, that's physical abuse. But having their butt sting for 30 seconds isn't abuse.
But you explicitly said there are certain people who don't "deserve" due process, which is guaranteed to all in the constitution. So, you must think the constitution is wrong about that.
"My boy was a good boy, he was going to church and trying to turn his life around"
You mean those types of criminals who can seem to get out of the habit of getting in trouble?
As far as Gaza, it's pretty much a parking lot now. On to Beirut and then Tehran.
It's funny that you immediately go to "lefty lib" to describe anyone that disagrees with you. If you look into it, you'll find that the research that has been done on this topic strongly suggests that spanking (or any other kind of physical violence towards children) is an ineffective form of discipline and can cause long-term damage. Your tough-guy persona does not invalidate that research.
Nice generalization. No I mean the people that have realized the error of their ways and became productive members of society. They're out there. Lots of them. You want examples?
Prisons on every corner in your utopia.
Thank your god I don't view life like you do. Catholics don't believe in forgiveness? Another Christian hypocrite.
Under you kat username.Is it?
So again I'll ask. Are you mistaken or are you lying?
Research also shows kids who have experienced corporal punishment are more likely to be violent in their dating relationships and in marriage. They also tend to be more aggressive (bullying) and more prone to lying and cheating. They tend to think getting physical is a solution to their problems.
But look who I'm talking to. It's just lefty lib psycho babble science for kids who got beat up at recess.
Yeh. I think repeat offenders deserve to get tuned up.
Why do they repeat offend? Because the consequence they've received haven't been consequential enough.
How many chances to you think someone should get?
How many felonies should someone allowed to be convicted of?
Show me your reference.
Exposing the poor research fueling the anti-spanking campaign
“Spanking is linked to aggression, antisocial behavior, mental health problems, cognitive difficulties, low self-esteem, and a whole host of other negative outcomes.” So declared a 2016 news article from Good Housekeeping, one of dozens of articles reporting on the latest overview of research on...
reformedperspective.ca
Could this be the reason for the high murder rates in inner cities controlled by dems?
All of these cases against Trump are far fetched.
It doesn't matter, the media and never Trumpers sucked it up.
Just like the impeachment hearings.
It's all meant to discredit, bankrupt and fill the populous-sheep with enough doubt, to not vote Trump.
These are valid questions, which are something for the legal system to wrestle with, but all of it still counts as due process. Getting "tuned up" is outside of due process. So, while we could have a discussion about how many chances someone gets or what the sentence should be for crimes, we can't really get there if your solution to those sentences not being harsh enough is that someone loses the protection of the constitution. Or are you suggesting that the constitution should be amended such that due process is no longer guaranteed? Or that it could be forfeited?
It's also funny that anything that's of a sort of scientific consensus that disagrees with you can be discounted because it comes from "lefty-libs," but you accept Christian organizations as a good source for science criticism. Like I could link you to Answers in Genesis and they'd have a similarly authoritative article about how the science that says the Earth is 4.5 billion years old is actually based on poor research, but that doesn't make the claim that it's 6-10k years old any less ridiculous. Never once in the history of humanity has religion disproved science. Only better science does that. But, since you asked for a reference:Show me your reference.
Exposing the poor research fueling the anti-spanking campaign
“Spanking is linked to aggression, antisocial behavior, mental health problems, cognitive difficulties, low self-esteem, and a whole host of other negative outcomes.” So declared a 2016 news article from Good Housekeeping, one of dozens of articles reporting on the latest overview of research on...
- American Psychological Association - https://www.apa.org/monitor/2012/04/spanking
- American Academy of Pediatrics - https://publications.aap.org/aapnew...punishment-draws-on?autologincheck=redirected
- American Academy of Child and AdolescentPsychiatry- https://www.aacap.org/aacap/Policy_Statements/2012/Policy_Statement_on_Corporal_Punishment.aspx
- American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children - https://apsac.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/AAP-statement-APSAC-letterhead-FINAL.pdf
- National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners - https://www.jpedhc.org/article/S0891-5245(11)00228-8/fulltext
Now, if you want to say you think the science is wrong, that's your prerogative. But you don't get to pretend to be in line with it when it very clearly does not support your position.
Last edited:
Oh, I see the problem. You're referring to a different poster. And the way you can tell is that our user names on here have different characters in them. Hope this helps!
