Nuke deal with Iran revisited.

[BoilerMadness]

When two parties negotiate a deal, there are usually elements of the deal, that will benefit each party. I'm still trying to determine what we got out of the deal.

Iran has stated publicly, that they were spinning the centrifuges to generate fuel for nuclear reactors to provide power for Iran. Obviously, that's not true. since you don't put the centrifuges in the base of a mountain, if they were only for peaceful purposes. First, why didn't we pressure them harder to terminate their nuclear program. before it got to this point.

Secondly, why were ICBMs even a part of the negotiation, and even more importantly, why did we ultimately CONCEDE access to ICBMs to Iran? Wouldn't the rational response be, when Iran brought this up, to say, "Not only NO, but HELL NO"

Regardless of whether you lean Left or Right politically, doesn't it disturb you, that Iran gained access to ICBMs along with the nuclear weapons? Do you feel safer now, as a result of this deal?

 

[ANDY597]

I wrote a letter to Donnelly his reply was bs. He said we would be going in there to remove them in ten years so why not go in now is question.

 

[qazplm]

I wrote a letter to Donnelly his reply was bs. He said we would be going in there to remove them in ten years so why not go in now is question.

So you think we are going to invade a country four times the size of Iraq with a unified populace?

 

[gr8indoorsman]

Regardless of whether you lean Left or Right politically, doesn't it disturb you, that Iran gained access to ICBMs along with the nuclear weapons?

No. Iran will gain access to nuclear weapons and ICBMs in time anyway. I don't think for a second that they'll meet all the terms of this agreement, and thus the international community and the US will be in stronger position to act in whatever means is deemed most viable in the near future. That does not include invading Iran.

 

[Jedifick]

Obaaaama, the king of foreign policy blunders.