There's no getting through to someone with zero compassion for other people. Bigotry is so strong in you, that it's just never going to fade.
I guess I’m not sure what you are arguing. Are you saying this is the government’s job just like those things are?
I feel sorry for your daughters.....It must be rough having a richard cranium as a father.
I have plenty of compassion for people. I just don't need to feed into the delusion of someone who's arguably mentally ill. Or, I'll even give you they're not mentally ill and just want to be the opposite sex. But you know what? It's doesn't work that way. God and Mother Nature already decided what you are and no amount of wishing, surgery or makeup is going to change that. Therefore, just because you believe you're a woman, I'm sorry, you're not. And that means you don't get to compete against real women or use the women's locker room.
I hope you don't have daughters. They'll be severely disappointed to learn their dad isn't willing to protect them and that he cares more about the feelings of a tranny than theirs.
The question was whether it was the govts job to get involved in men playing woman's sports. My retort was whether it was the govts job to get involved in a lot of things.
Right. So I guess you think it is? Only way I can follow what you are saying.
You've heard this a lot, but you're a really sick person. I protect my family by keeping them away from nutjobs like you and living in a blue state. Working super well this far.
Ha ha. Let me guess…do you live in a state where they put tampons in the boy’s bathrooms?
If Trump accomplishes what he's set out to do over the next 3.5 years, it's going to be extremely difficult for the dems to win another election for a long, long time. The Repubs will put in a much less divisive candidate (Vance) who will be less polarizing and will garner even more of the independent vote. Should be another blowout over Newsome in '28.
Ah, yes, right wing Fantasyland. Unfortunately for you, reality isn't on your side.
Pure irony that your ****ING MORON of a president rules solely by emotions. He's also been divorced twice.
No tax on overtime only affects a very specific and small part of the working population. No tax on tips is a similarly limited demographic. Are you an hourly employee? If not, it doesn't help you one iota. Also note that Democrats were proposing this. Permanent tax cuts comes at the expense of other programs, such SS. This segues to your fourth point, which you admit was a lie and was bitched about in your previous post.
The strategy might be a make a lot of noise early, which Trump has clearly done and then let things smooth out over time, ie. as the next election cycle approaches. Most people (undecideds and the middle) will forget what happened 3 years ago in '25 and focus on the current state of the union in '27-28.
Curious....what do you think will happen?
So you admit we have an utterly stupid electorate who continually vote against their best interests and have zero clue what's going on. Sounds about right ...
I'm for everyone paying their fair share. Stop giving the ultra wealthy loopholes and tax breaks. Stop giving corporations tax breaks. Trickle down economics is a fantasy that never worked, as shown by four decades of precedent.
Note: overtime work is already compensated at 1.5x hourly rate. I guess you're technically correct that your voter base voted for a terrible president to earn a few extra bucks. 100% of hourly workers are not working overtime, so it only affects a portion of that population. Part-time McDonald's workers don't get overtime.
I'm glad you brought up "fair share".
I think the majority of people are inherently lazy and believe what they're told, which is why the democrats get so excited about celebrity endorsements. People that believe Oprah, George Clooney or Robert Dinerio, simply because they're famous, are inherently stupid.
Yeah, I don't exploit the system to claim I actually lost money while collecting 8 figures. How did I determine fair share? I mean, you could argue about tax brackets and the percentages associated, but I pay taxes and believe we all should to fund things like schools and roads. What do you believe, that taxes shouldn't exist at all?
How would you answer this question? Because it's clearly not asked in good faith, not that anything you say or ask ever is.
So people and companies should pay their fair share, but you won’t define what fair share is.
You're trying to be clever and are failing. You clearly aren't asking a question in good faith, you're trying to be snarky.
I call complete bullshit on these items. In the congressional hearings there was CLEAR evidence that the middle and lower tax brackets will see INCREASES in their tax obligation. SOME (but not all) Seniors will see a very small tax credit but they are still being taxed on monies that were already taxed throughout their lifetime. Couple that with the forced reduction of SSN benefits that will be enacted when the "Big Ugly Bill" is inacted and the debt level rises. ADD the attacks on both Medicaid and Medicare (Those cost will rise rapidly for consumers) and the middle and lower classes are hosed. All of these things have been acknowledged in congressional hearings.
What am I failing at? People all the time say people should pay their fair share. Is fair share for me to pay more than you or you pay more than me? Is a flat tax the answer? Should deductions be done away with?
Maybe you missed the news, klinker, but this is not the smartest day to call him Taco.
Is exploiting and using a system to your advantage the same thing?
How do you get around the idea that if you substantially reduce the taxes on the rich so they pay their 'fair share,' you would have to very significantly increase the taxes on the middle class and poor to make up for the difference just to fund the things you mentioned?
The lefty libs dems always cry about the wealthy not paying their 'fair share' yet the can never define what that is. I believe wealthy people are wealthy mostly because they make good decisions and take risk accordingly. Is there some luck, sure. But if it weren't mostly hard work, everyone would be wealthy. They also invest, spend, and feed the economy. Disincentivizing them to do so is neither fair nor smart.
