ADVERTISEMENT

My takeaway on Maryland

mediaexpert

True Freshman
Jan 19, 2007
949
1,419
93
119
Plano
My takeaways from the game. Maryland is probably the fourth best team in the conference. We played them on their home court giving them a huge advantage. They came in from games where they had the twin towers at times with big men that give up a lot of fouls. This game they did not go Twin Towers, because they saw Haarms eat Bender alive. Instead they kept Jackson at the 4 and Huerter at the 3. We kept Vince at the 4 and even though Jackson got too many O rebounds, Vince kept him from being a big scorer. They expected more scoring from Huerter, but Mathias was all over him. Both men would look to come inside, but the sight of Haas intimidated them. Their SG looked to play well, but their shooting stats showed Carson played good D too. PJ did a good job forcing Cowan to take seconds off the shot clock brining the ball up. Maryland only shot 35% - great job for all on D.


The most surprising stats were Maryland did not have that many turnovers. I was expecting twice as many and I do not know enough about their history as to why there were not more. The other stat was they did not have that many fouls. Their big men especially get into easy foul trouble. They did not. However, the good news is that their big men did not score much except for put backs or when Haas double teamed. Chekovsky did make a nice move against Haas to score left handed. We played great considering the majority of our foul shots came from intentional fouls or technical. Again, even though Maryland never went Twin Towers, I would have liked to see it employed when their shooting got hot, but no complaint as Haarms was in foul trouble. If we keep playing smart like this, I can see us only losing 2 conference games.
 
My takeaways from the game. Maryland is probably the fourth best team in the conference. We played them on their home court giving them a huge advantage. They came in from games where they had the twin towers at times with big men that give up a lot of fouls. This game they did not go Twin Towers, because they saw Haarms eat Bender alive. Instead they kept Jackson at the 4 and Huerter at the 3. We kept Vince at the 4 and even though Jackson got too many O rebounds, Vince kept him from being a big scorer. They expected more scoring from Huerter, but Mathias was all over him. Both men would look to come inside, but the sight of Haas intimidated them. Their SG looked to play well, but their shooting stats showed Carson played good D too. PJ did a good job forcing Cowan to take seconds off the shot clock brining the ball up. Maryland only shot 35% - great job for all on D.


The most surprising stats were Maryland did not have that many turnovers. I was expecting twice as many and I do not know enough about their history as to why there were not more. The other stat was they did not have that many fouls. Their big men especially get into easy foul trouble. They did not. However, the good news is that their big men did not score much except for put backs or when Haas double teamed. Chekovsky did make a nice move against Haas to score left handed. We played great considering the majority of our foul shots came from intentional fouls or technical. Again, even though Maryland never went Twin Towers, I would have liked to see it employed when their shooting got hot, but no complaint as Haarms was in foul trouble. If we keep playing smart like this, I can see us only losing 2 conference games.
My takeaways from the game. Maryland is probably the fourth best team in the conference. We played them on their home court giving them a huge advantage. They came in from games where they had the twin towers at times with big men that give up a lot of fouls. This game they did not go Twin Towers, because they saw Haarms eat Bender alive. Instead they kept Jackson at the 4 and Huerter at the 3. We kept Vince at the 4 and even though Jackson got too many O rebounds, Vince kept him from being a big scorer. They expected more scoring from Huerter, but Mathias was all over him. Both men would look to come inside, but the sight of Haas intimidated them. Their SG looked to play well, but their shooting stats showed Carson played good D too. PJ did a good job forcing Cowan to take seconds off the shot clock brining the ball up. Maryland only shot 35% - great job for all on D.


The most surprising stats were Maryland did not have that many turnovers. I was expecting twice as many and I do not know enough about their history as to why there were not more. The other stat was they did not have that many fouls. Their big men especially get into easy foul trouble. They did not. However, the good news is that their big men did not score much except for put backs or when Haas double teamed. Chekovsky did make a nice move against Haas to score left handed. We played great considering the majority of our foul shots came from intentional fouls or technical. Again, even though Maryland never went Twin Towers, I would have liked to see it employed when their shooting got hot, but no complaint as Haarms was in foul trouble. If we keep playing smart like this, I can see us only losing 2 conference games.
hey Mediaexpert, I appreciate your analysis, you have provided a lot of good insight into that game and the Terps but I’m not convinced Maryland is 4th best in BIG. I think there are a lot of BIG teams with potential to move up - maybe even above 4th. I acknowledge BIG has generally been unimpressive to date, but it’s really early. The national pundits have dismissed most of the BIG based on these very early results especially the BIG/ACC challenge flop but the BIG is not nearly as weak as it’s being characterized. Be careful about underestimating. Also, if you live in Indy you are inundated by the pro IU media who desperately want to dismiss the BIG anytime their beloved Hoosiers are not contenders
 
I’m damn glad Purdue got this one out of the way early... Terps will be hell on B1G teams in that building as they mature this year.

I agree. Those guys could be really good over the next few years. Fernando is going to be a load to deal with. Cowan and Heurter look like versatile scorers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: todd brewster
Maryland is a very good team. Huerter is a damn good player, cringe NBA player week his time is up. He's as close to a Robbie Hummel as we've seen in this league. Went to high school in NY near where I live now. The sophomores and freshmen they have are going to be problems this year and the next 3 years. A very good win, IMO. They won't lose more than 2 games at home this year from here on out, I'm good we stole one. It took Haas and Mathias to score 40+ with nearly 70% shooting to pull it off.
 
Maryland is a very good team. Huerter is a damn good player, cringe NBA player week his time is up. He's as close to a Robbie Hummel as we've seen in this league. Went to high school in NY near where I live now. The sophomores and freshmen they have are going to be problems this year and the next 3 years. A very good win, IMO. They won't lose more than 2 games at home this year from here on out, I'm good we stole one. It took Haas and Mathias to score 40+ with nearly 70% shooting to pull it off.

I don’t really like the Hummel comparison.

Reminds me of diebler from osu though.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT