Lolol I was thinking the same thing. It’s either the first or it has been a looooong time since we have seen him dunkThats literally the first time I've seen him dunk.
Haha they are projected as a 1 right now. They should run through the weak acc. I think we’d see them at minimum second round and prob sweet 16 if we were to be in their bracket.You just know that somehow we are meeting them in the first round of the NCAA tourney this year....
I'm thinking Alabama in the R32---assuming Purdue doesn't have a Little Rock/North Texas/FDU moment in the R64. And I'm sure Tennessee will be in there somewhere, too.You just know that somehow we are meeting them in the first round of the NCAA tourney this year....
I'm biting my tongue here bud. 😉
Lol I knew you’d like that.I'm biting my tongue here bud. 😉
Loved Mason.
Career Averages | Games | Field Goals | Three Points | Free Throws | Rebounds | Miscellaneous | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Season | Team | Type | G | Min | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | OR | DR | Reb | Ast | TO | Stl | Blk | Pts |
2020-21 | PUR | Reg | 28 | 22 | 1.6 | 3.5 | 46.5 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 35.2 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 81.4 | 1.6 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 5.2 |
2021-22 | PUR | Reg | 33 | 23 | 2.1 | 4.3 | 49.6 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 41.4 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 85.0 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 6.4 |
2022-23 | PUR | Reg | 32 | 20 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 45.8 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 35.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 79.6 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 6.8 |
2023-24 | PUR | Reg | 31 | 20 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 51.1 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 49.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 84.6 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 7.0 |
2024-25 | DUKE | Reg | 14 | 14 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 40.7 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 28.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 83.3 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 4.3 |
Oh yeah, he was in a great system at Purdue for the type of player he was/isLoved Mason.
His production though has dropped quite a bit.
Career Averages Games Field Goals Three Points Free Throws Rebounds Miscellaneous Season Team Type G Min FGM FGA FG% 3PM 3PA 3P% FTM FTA FT% OR DR Reb Ast TO Stl Blk Pts 2020-21 PUR Reg 28 22 1.6 3.5 46.5 0.7 1.9 35.2 1.3 1.5 81.4 1.6 2.5 4.1 1.3 1.1 0.4 0.1 5.2 2021-22 PUR Reg 33 23 2.1 4.3 49.6 1.1 2.6 41.4 1.0 1.2 85.0 1.5 3.3 4.8 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 6.4 2022-23 PUR Reg 32 20 2.2 4.8 45.8 1.2 3.3 35.6 1.2 1.5 79.6 1.3 2.5 3.8 1.3 1.0 0.5 0.1 6.8 2023-24 PUR Reg 31 20 2.2 4.3 51.1 1.5 3.2 49.0 1.1 1.3 84.6 1.2 2.6 3.8 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 7.0 2024-25 DUKE Reg 14 14 1.6 3.9 40.7 0.8 2.8 28.2 0.4 0.4 83.3 0.6 1.7 2.4 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.0 4.3
Different system and team. It's why I always twitch a bit when someone says X player wouldn't do well here because they aren't having a great season at Y team.Loved Mason.
His production though has dropped quite a bit.
Career Averages Games Field Goals Three Points Free Throws Rebounds Miscellaneous Season Team Type G Min FGM FGA FG% 3PM 3PA 3P% FTM FTA FT% OR DR Reb Ast TO Stl Blk Pts 2020-21 PUR Reg 28 22 1.6 3.5 46.5 0.7 1.9 35.2 1.3 1.5 81.4 1.6 2.5 4.1 1.3 1.1 0.4 0.1 5.2 2021-22 PUR Reg 33 23 2.1 4.3 49.6 1.1 2.6 41.4 1.0 1.2 85.0 1.5 3.3 4.8 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.2 6.4 2022-23 PUR Reg 32 20 2.2 4.8 45.8 1.2 3.3 35.6 1.2 1.5 79.6 1.3 2.5 3.8 1.3 1.0 0.5 0.1 6.8 2023-24 PUR Reg 31 20 2.2 4.3 51.1 1.5 3.2 49.0 1.1 1.3 84.6 1.2 2.6 3.8 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 7.0 2024-25 DUKE Reg 14 14 1.6 3.9 40.7 0.8 2.8 28.2 0.4 0.4 83.3 0.6 1.7 2.4 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.0 4.3
But do you twitch when they say X player would do well here because they are having a great season at Y team?!Different system and team. It's why I always twitch a bit when someone says X player wouldn't do well here because they aren't having a great season at Y team.
Roles, systems all play a part but a talented player is still a talented player. Gillis is a talented player.
Are they a good player? Then no. I will assume if they are here, Painter has a role for them that fits.But do you twitch when they say X player would do well here because they are having a great season at Y team?!