Kentucky. West Virginia, Or...better yet, go back to 10.You need to add Texas A&M to that list. Aggies may be POed enough to get out of the SEC and they are the best addition the B1G could make other than Texas and ND. Land Grant school, AAU member, preseason polls have them ranked #2 in the SEC behind Bama, adds the state of Texas to the BTN footprint (population 29 million), #6 nationally in football attendance (ahead of Texas and ND) and it opens up the state of Texas for B1G recruiting. Also, check out this list of Forbes most valuable football programs:
Forbes
You might also add Mizzou to the list. They also had huge heartburn with Texas in the Big XII and may prefer the B1G to the SEC if UT joins the latter.
That is correct. Also, there is no buyout at all from the SEC. Any school can quit without paying a dime.The ACC teams have signed over their media rights to the conference through the length of their tv deal, which goes well into the next decade. They aren’t moving.
All it takes is the right amount of money to move any school out of an agreement. It happens all the time in business, and this is business.The ACC teams have signed over their media rights to the conference through the length of their tv deal, which goes well into the next decade. They aren’t moving.
I’d love to go back to the Big11Ten. Purdue fans seem to want to add teams that will push our stature within the conference downKentucky. West Virginia, Or...better yet, go back to 10.
Kentucky .. the womenPersonally I think the Big Ten means more than sports. I only want schools that have good academic reputations in addition to solid sports. Notre Dame, Virginia, UNC, Pitt (location gives Pitt a boost)
speaking of Kansas, Robby Steinhardt the violinist and founding member of the band Kansas passed away at 71 on July 17th.No to Kansas unless they man up and fire Bill Self first.
Carry On Wayward Son to Purdue Football news in your next postspeaking of Kansas, Robby Steinhardt the violinist and founding member of the band Kansas passed away at 71 on July 17th.
if there would be some I would.Carry On Wayward Son to Purdue Football news in your next post
RIP Robby Steinhardt from Kansas. Funny scene when Will Ferrell sang this in “Old School”: You’re my boy, Blue!A tribute-
RIP Robby Steinhardt from Kansas. Funny scene when Will Ferrell sang this in “Old School”: You’re my boy, Blue!
I don’t agree. Get the BIG and ACC to “partner” and have the beginnings of the first “super conference”. BIG has 14 teams and the ACC has 15. Make a couple crossover games each season. The BIG still has a Championship game and the ACC does too. The two Champs play each other.ACC schools are in an airtight GOR until 2036.
There will be no ACC schools.
ACC is owned by ESPN, B1G is Fox. No go.I don’t agree. Get the BIG and ACC to “partner” and have the beginnings of the first “super conference”. BIG has 14 teams and the ACC has 15. Make a couple crossover games each season. The BIG still has a Championship game and the ACC does too. The two Champs play each other.
The revenues from this would be astronomical. The TV $ could be huge and you force ESPN to work with the BIG again instead of having them constantly cutting it down on air. ESPN already has the ACCN.
Doing this doesn’t force a breakup of either the ACC or the BIG. It just makes the two conferences stronger. Now ND is incentivized to play more BIG teams. You’ll get matchups like OSU/Clemson, Michigan/Miami, and PSU/FSU fairly often. ND can play Purdue, Michigan, Michigan, etc.
Also, I do believe that if 2 conf decide to partner it would be B1G and PAC (historical ties and Fox Sports ties as Fox underpins both of their networks), but B1G has great revenue that will be on par w the SEC even with TX and OU. B1G would be subsidizing lesser conferences by joining w them. We really don't need to do anything like that.I don’t agree. Get the BIG and ACC to “partner” and have the beginnings of the first “super conference”. BIG has 14 teams and the ACC has 15. Make a couple crossover games each season. The BIG still has a Championship game and the ACC does too. The two Champs play each other.
The revenues from this would be astronomical. The TV $ could be huge and you force ESPN to work with the BIG again instead of having them constantly cutting it down on air. ESPN already has the ACCN.
Doing this doesn’t force a breakup of either the ACC or the BIG. It just makes the two conferences stronger. Now ND is incentivized to play more BIG teams. You’ll get matchups like OSU/Clemson, Michigan/Miami, and PSU/FSU fairly often. ND can play Purdue, Michigan, Michigan, etc.
And nd is owned by the Weinstein Network.ACC is owned by ESPN, B1G is Fox. No go.
Also - I edited my post.
PAC-12 makes no sense in the big scheme of things anymore. Guess how much PAC-12 teams make per school right now. $3.75M. BIG pays $55M. Our next TV contracts will only go up.Also, I do believe that if 2 conf decide to partner it would be B1G and PAC (historical ties and Fox Sports ties as Fox underpins both of their networks), but B1G has great revenue that will be on par w the SEC even with TX and OU. B1G would be subsidizing lesser conferences by joining w them. We really don't need to do anything like that.
I agree RE PAC. I'm not for it at all. Like I said, B1G gonna do fine. We don't need to rescue other conferences.PAC-12 makes no sense in the big scheme of things anymore. Guess how much PAC-12 teams make per school right now. $3.75M. BIG pays $55M. Our next TV contracts will only go up.
The ACC is not a lesser conference overall (especially when you factor in BB) AND the population shifts are only going to make the ACC MORE valuable over time, not less.
I agree with you on the networks issue somewhat. Guess what. The BIG is negotiating new TV deals for 2024 and on, right? At worst, having some ESPN competition will only drive the TV money up from FOX. If we have a deal with the ACC, ESPN will want to be in on that action, no?I agree RE PAC. I'm not for it at all. Like I said, B1G gonna do fine. We don't need to rescue other conferences.
Problem as I see it w the ACC is ESPN and the ACCN etc etc etc. It's as much Fox v ESPN at this point as Conferences vs each other. They're invested in which schools go where, and they make the payments.
I just don't think the ACC can even go anywhere bc their deal with ESPN runs thru 2036 and the ACCN is dependent on that. Unless they want to scrap everything and start from scratch??I agree with you on the networks issue somewhat. Guess what. The BIG is negotiating new TV deals for 2024 and on, right? At worst, having some ESPN competition will only drive the TV money up from FOX. If we have a deal with the ACC, ESPN will want to be in on that action, no?
Syracuse is a total wildcard. Sleeping giant potential or permanently third fiddle? Would their programs and by extension their fan base be awakened by inclusion in a big revenue conference? A situation that bookends the NY market with Rutgers and provides each other with a regional rival? The sheer prospect of making college football matter (and be the conference to reap the benefits) in that heavily populated part of the country has to have some appeal. But you’re facing decades of apathy. It would be a gamble, essential doubling down on the Rutgers move.Should this poll include Oklahoma State and Syracuse?
Who says the big will be we if we included the powers? 😉I agree RE PAC. I'm not for it at all. Like I said, B1G gonna do fine. We don't need to rescue other conferences.
Problem as I see it w the ACC is ESPN and the ACCN etc etc etc. It's as much Fox v ESPN at this point as Conferences vs each other. They're invested in which schools go where, and they make the payments.