I didn't say Purdue would turn down either player. I said if one player commits, looking at our other talented receivers who are redshirting this year, and our other current receiver commits, I doubt the other of the two would commit to Purdue.
I liken it to Martin and Hummel. They were both great players who unfortunately played the same position. Martin wanted to be a starter and didn't want to share time, so he left for ND.
Typically, if you're an elite athlete, you want and expect to start, rather than sharing the time and the ball. I believe it's kind of obvious, whoever signs with Purdue will be our #2 receiving option for at least the next two years. And if we sign both Bell and Wright, one of the two will be our #3 option, and maybe #4 with our other recruits. I know these guys all talk about it's a team and everything. But how many elite 4* athletes want to come to a team where they know they will be the #3 option for at least the next 2 years?
You don't know any of that.These, like a lot of posts from other posters, are pure assumptions. None of us have any idea if Bell, Wright, Sheffield, or Rice will be the #1, #2, or #3 option next year (Assuming we get Bell and/or Wright). A lot of people on here seem to post like they know exactly who will start, red-shirt, and sit the bench. The catch is, none of us know what Brohm and his staff know and none of us can say for sure who will be what option next year. Bell and Wright are talented high school receivers who could come in and compete right way or maybe not. Bell and Wright could commit to Purdue and beat out the other receivers and start right off the bat with Moore in the slot. Then again, they could commit and red-shirt. Who can say. Some guys pan out and some don't. Selwyn Lymon should have been the best or one of the best receivers to ever play at Purdue, but he we all know how that went. Nobody has a guarenteed starting job.