ADVERTISEMENT

Michigan 500,000 more registrations than voters of eligible age.....what could possibly go wrong??

Boiler Buck

All-American
Mar 11, 2010
15,989
16,091
113
Dems: "Nothing to see here....move along". Btw ...they will fix the problem by 2027. So you see....no problem here. I'm sure a liberal judge will agree.

From the article....."Voters in Flint cast ballots in 2022. In most municipalities and counties, there are more registered voters than people old enough to vote."

Also Georgia, PA & Mich say 4 days after election before results announced. Hopefully, Red counties get smart & hold onto their vote tally information until after the Blue counties submit.....if you understand the landscape. Just be considerate & remove temptation from those Blues.

 
Last edited:
Sorry.

Dems: "Nothing to see here....move along". Btw ...they will fix the problem by 2027. So you see....no problem here. I'm sure a liberal judge will agree.

From the article....."Voters in Flint cast ballots in 2022. In most municipalities and counties, there are more registered voters than people old enough to vote."

Also Georgia, PA & Mich say 4 days after election before results announced. Hopefully, Red counties get smart & hold onto their vote tally information until after the Blue counties submit.....if you understand the landscape. Just be considerate & remove temptation from those Blues.

From your article.

What about fraud?

Thomas said he doesn’t fear widespread fraud in part because people have to knowingly falsify a signature.

“Impersonation fraud is almost non-existent,” he said.

Vote fraud happens, but it’s rare. Just this month Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office charged four St. Clair Shores voters with voting twice in the August primary.


In other words, a person would have to commit a felony to gain one vote.

That's one problem with all this fraud BS. In real life only an idiot would risk a felony to commit election fraud. But it makes for a good conspiracy.

Btw, lose. But you preemptively blamed the liberal judge so you're good.
 
Thomas said he doesn’t fear widespread fraud in part because people have to knowingly falsify a signature.

“Impersonation fraud is almost non-existent,” he said.

Vote fraud happens, but it’s rare. Just this month Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office charged four St. Clair Shores voters with voting twice in the August primary.


In other words, a person would have to commit a felony to gain one vote.

That's one problem with all this fraud BS. In real life only an idiot would risk a felony to commit election fraud. But it makes for a good conspiracy.

Btw, lose. But you preemptively blamed the liberal judge so you're good.

Yes, you can always find a lib official and a lib judge to back up wacko situations and ideas. Here, no difference......nothing new under the sun.

Are you actually saying it is a good situation to have more people registered to vote, than actual voters?
Surely not??
 
Last edited:
Yes, you can always find a lib official and a lib judge to back up wacko situations and ideas. Here, no difference......nothing new under the sun.

Are you actually saying it is a good situation to have more people registered to vote, than actual voters?
Surely not??
If it benefits the dems, Bob's all for it.
Or, it it has anything to do with Jan 6, Bob's also all in on that.
 
Sorry.


From your article.

What about fraud?

Thomas said he doesn’t fear widespread fraud in part because people have to knowingly falsify a signature.

“Impersonation fraud is almost non-existent,” he said.

Vote fraud happens, but it’s rare. Just this month Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office charged four St. Clair Shores voters with voting twice in the August primary.


In other words, a person would have to commit a felony to gain one vote.

That's one problem with all this fraud BS. In real life only an idiot would risk a felony to commit election fraud. But it makes for a good conspiracy.

Btw, lose. But you preemptively blamed the liberal judge so you're good.
This is BS. How can anyone believe this with a process that is objectively not auditable? There's more faith in this statement than there is in most people's belief in God!
 
Let's see.....
👉Lawfare
👉Trump has assassination attempts
👉Media manipulation
👉Internet shadow banning
👉$1 billion+
👉Dark money coming from who knows where....but we can guess.
👉DOJ suing states over voter roles
👉Now more of these unacceptable Dem state/city registration and voting chinanigans.

As I have said.....there is just no way the establishment lets Trump be President.

No wonder Trump's campaign knows the victory margin flat out has to be ....."Too big to Rig."
 
Yes, you can always find a lib official and a lib judge to back up wacko situations and ideas. Here, no difference...........nothing new under the sun.
Are you actually saying it is a good situation to have more people registered to vote, than actual voters?
Surely not??

You don't even read your own links. You're becoming a headline reader who cries victim when the explanation is right in front of you. Never mind that trump republicans file lawsuits when the wind blows. There's nothing here but that doesn't stop you from saying you're once again getting screwed over by the courts.

"While critics say the inflated rolls are not ideal, no one is suggesting they have contributed to fraud. One major cause of the imbalance: A voter-approved 2018 proposal that automatically registers those 18 and older to vote when applying for a driver license, unless they opt out."

The RNC wasn't even claiming fraud occurred. Just the increased potential of it. They couldn't provide an instance of it happening. How is that a winning argument?
 
You don't even read your own links. You're becoming a headline reader who cries victim when the explanation is right in front of you. Never mind that trump republicans file lawsuits when the wind blows. There's nothing here but that doesn't stop you from saying you're once again getting screwed over by the courts.

"While critics say the inflated rolls are not ideal, no one is suggesting they have contributed to fraud. One major cause of the imbalance: A voter-approved 2018 proposal that automatically registers those 18 and older to vote when applying for a driver license, unless they opt out."

The RNC wasn't even claiming fraud occurred. Just the increased potential of it. They couldn't provide an instance of it happening. How is that a winning argument?

Again, are you actually saying it is a good situation to have more people registered to vote, than actual voters?

Surely not??
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT