And Chump can't select blacks for these cabinet positions. Unbelievable.
Linda McMahon: So being co-CEO of a wrastling federation qualifies you for Secretary of Education
- Thread starter BNIBoiler
- Start date
You are certainly obsessed with the selection of people based on skin color.
What does skin color have to do with anything?
Do you complain that there should be more white players in the NBA?
The main gist of the post was to point the ridiculousness of the selection pick. However, as non-qualified as McMahon appears to be, there are a lot folks more qualified that should have been selected including black educators. The woman is not even an educator in any form.
You tell me, is Linda McMahon qualified to be Secretary of Education?
It's called diversity. The lack of diversity does not respresent the diverseness of America. However, she is a woman. Perhaps Chump was trying to check that box. And that's kinda my other point I'm making. I have yet to hear you guys say that the white woman that Chump has selected are DEI hires. But when a black woman gets selected for something, its automatically a DEI hire.
Chump selected a white woman as press secretary. Not one of you mentioned if she was a DEI hire. But when Biden chose a black woman as his press secretary, she was a DEI hire according to y'all. White women have benefited from affirmative action more than any group, but that's ok apparently.
You tell me, is Linda McMahon qualified to be Secretary of Education?
Apparently skin color was important for you when it came to blacks voting for Chump. Over and over you kept bragging, incorrectly mind you, of the elevated black numbers voting for Chump. So apparently you like diversity when it comes getting your man elected. Now that he won diversity doesn't matter to you now.
Yes, she's very qualified.
She was the CEO of a multinational corporation for nearly 30 years. Just because she didn't teach grade school math doesn't mean she's not qualified.
She's going to come in and trim the fat and make the dept more efficient.
Kamala got hired based on her race and gender, and was given ONE JOB, and then failed spectacularly.
How about we let the adults handle things for the next 4 years?
BNI suddenly cares about cabinet picks???
Hilarious.
Show me post history where he criticized Dem's cabinet choices as much as he has Trump's. Then he MIGHT have some credibility?
But otherwise he is just a partisan raving lunatic.
Uncle, she is being selected to close down a worthless department. It has nothing to do with being a 'qualified educator' , whatever that is supposed to mean.
ALL Rs know this.
Given Dem media choices likely good of you to point it out to him, as he clearly did not know.
Like all Dems ....need to ask themselves where they get their wrong & missing info. But they never do.....
Last edited:
To be completely honest, I don't know enough about Gaetz. I know he's a controversial pick and there's a lot of questions circling around him but I haven't sat down and really learned both sides of the story. So unfortunately, I can't give an educated response.
What are the qualifications?
Merrick Garland and Eric Holder were no doubt qualified on paper to you, but turned out to be horrible.
Same for Austin in DoD, and especially Blinken in State.
And how about the disgraceful hack in Homeland Security - and all the damage he has caused.
How about more than two years actually practicing law?
If you tried to type a post without deflecting your fingers would fall off.
I don't know if there any written qualifications or not but Gaetz ain't it. Just the mere fact that Gaetz has serious allegations against him should have disqualified him from being selected as these allegations were known. Chump has sent a clear message in his cabinet picks that they are there to not advise the president. They are there to do his authoritative bidding of running the government. Do you feel that Gaetz is qualified for AG?
As far as Garland, Holder, Austin, and Blinken, as with all administrations mistakes are made but there successes are made as well. I have no problems with either of the aforementioned.
It is not deflecting to ask bni what qualifications he thinks are needed in an AG since he is saying Gaetz is not qualified.
How about more than two years of practicing? Why would that be important for the AG role?
An AG sets policy but does not actually try cases. You know that, right?
Allegations do not mean proof. The Biden Justice Dept dropped the case. Do you think if they had a case they would have dropped a chance to discredit a repub congressman?
I don't know. I would like to hear his confirmation hearings first before rushing to judgement like urban radio and you.
No, I don't know that because it's freaking ridiculous. No more so than it is for the SecDef like you said the other day in the conversation about Hegseth and his lack of experience managing in large organizations. I guess this some new BS excuse you are trying push to make these people sound qualified. Experience is overrated right?
The DOJ has a justice manual that lays out DOJ policy. Of course the AG doesn't try cases. He does decide which cases get prosecuted in some instances and others are because its policy. He also advises the executive branch and congress. He knows the law inside and out thanks to his years of experience trying cases, in addition to his many years as a JUDGE. I'm not even gonna look this up but I guarantee past AGs have been a judge, state AG, federal prosecutor, deputy or assistant AG, US attorney or deputy attorney. Gaetz has barely been a practicing attorney in private practice.
As for Hegseth, you said something to the effect of people managing large companies just set policy and let lower management take it from there.
CEOs, CFOs, COOs and CMOs everywhere are laughing. Hell, Pete doesn't even have management experience in positions in lower positions than those. How about a VP of operations or Executive Director of SOMETHING.
The evil Garland who was unqualified and went after republicans strictly based on politics didn't prosecute because he didn't think he could win the case based on the evidence and beyond a reasonable doubt. There were lots of questions about the credibility of the witnesses. Gaetz wasn't exonerated.
She did one hell of a job in President Trump's last administration heading up Small Business. Lots of black entrepreneurs sure were better off with her help. Smart woman with balls bigger than her old mans.
Biden's hire was totally a DEI hire in two ways. Lesbian/Female. And Trump had male and female Press folks.
Deciding which cases get tried is policy, as is deciding which cases the feds bring against a political opponent like Trump. Withholding the Hur tape to protect Biden was policy. Sending a SWAT team to arrest a Christian minister was policy. These are just a few disgusting examples of a DA you are saying was highly qualified .
He also advises the executive branch and congress. He knows the law inside and out thanks to his years of experience trying cases, in addition to his many years as a JUDGE. I'm not even gonna look this up but I guarantee past AGs have been a judge, state AG, federal prosecutor, deputy or assistant AG, US attorney or deputy attorney. Gaetz has barely been a practicing attorney in private practice.
> Garland also enabled a coverup by the FBI of its role in Jan. 6.
I posted a link to bni about the hundreds of billions in lost inventory by DoD. Are you saying this was Austin's fault despite his great experience managing in large organizations?
The people you claim have been highly qualified have proven to be incompetent and/or corrupt, so I ask you and bni again, what are the qualifications for these jobs given the recent evidence?
What does that have anyrhing to do with heading the Dept of Education? Perhaps Commerse secretary would have been a better fit.
