ADVERTISEMENT

Liberal loathing's...

I think it’s good to not tax tips. SS, and overtime. However, if this becomes law, there will be no choice but to tax the wealthy. If that doesn’t happen and the middle class taxes stay the same, there won’t be enough revenue. Perhaps that’s why Chump is pushing these BS tariffs for revenue. But we all know the tariffs ain’t working.
We don't all know that.

If tariffs don't work, why do some many countries have them and other trade barriers against the US?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
We don't all know that.

If tariffs don't work, why do some many countries have them and other trade barriers against the US?
I don’t know. Maybe it worked for them. I think tariffs worked for the US in the 2000s when Bush the Younger put a 10% tariff on China steel. Did not cause a trade war. Chump got too greedy trying to use tariffs for US income and it ain’t and will not work.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
I think it’s good to not tax tips. SS, and overtime. However, if this becomes law, there will be no choice but to tax the wealthy. If that doesn’t happen and the middle class taxes stay the same, there won’t be enough revenue. Perhaps that’s why Chump is pushing these BS tariffs for revenue. But we all know the tariffs ain’t working.
What about cutting government spending, eliminating waste like DOGE has been doing? They've saved the Govt billions in a very short timeframe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
What do you think of Trump's plan to not tax tips, social security or overtime?

I think it’s good to not tax tips. SS, and overtime. However, if this becomes law, there will be no choice but to tax the wealthy. If that doesn’t happen and the middle class taxes stay the same, there won’t be enough revenue. Perhaps that’s why Chump is pushing these BS tariffs for revenue. But we all know the tariffs ain’t working.
.
@bonefish1 -- you asked if I'm a liberal? Here comes the free market, limited government perspective -- this is a prime example.

HELL NO! It is often full-on government overreach to pick and choose which industries get tax incentives. Let the market determine how much people get paid. Giving waiters and bartenders a tax break over construction workers, teachers, Walmart clerks; you name it? WTF!

The primary justification I could accept for an industry-specific income tax break would be to incentivize an under-populated and necessary profession. Can't get enough farm workers or air traffic controllers because it's too demanding or too complex to attract quality candidates? Then; sure. But bartenders and such? Government overreach defined.

.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BB62 and SKYDOG
What about cutting government spending, eliminating waste like DOGE has been doing? They've saved the Govt billions in a very short timeframe.
It's a fine line between cutting back bloated government programs (good) and arbitrarily eliminating necessary programs that won't heed to political wishes (bad).

IMO DOGE has done both of those things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
What about cutting government spending, eliminating waste like DOGE has been doing? They've saved the Govt billions in a very short timeframe.
That DOGE is crap. Looking into so called corruption is one thing. But indiscriminately firing federal workers is a bunch of bull junk. That was proven that this was not well thought of when they fired workers that controlled our weapons. Then after a whoops moment hired them back. Most of the folks fired were folks that scored well on their performance reviews. A lot of those fired are military veterans. These folks have families to take care of. The money that you claim saved is just a drop compared to the total spending numbers. Just concentrate on why it cost the government $500 for a hammer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
That DOGE is crap. Looking into so called corruption is one thing. But indiscriminately firing federal workers is a bunch of bull junk. That was proven that this was not well thought of when they fired workers that controlled our weapons. Then after a whoops moment hired them back. Most of the folks fired were folks that scored well on their performance reviews. A lot of those fired are military veterans. These folks have families to take care of. The money that you claim saved is just a drop compared to the total spending numbers. Just concentrate on why it cost the government $500 for a hammer.
Could have just downsized agencies by attrition; when people retire do not replace them. There are downsizing precedents for doing just that. Eliminates the arbitrary and politicized nature of who goes, will reduce the workforce by about 5% every year, and will get rid of the highest paid employees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
What about cutting government spending, eliminating waste like DOGE has been doing? They've saved the Govt billions in a very short timeframe.
If spending was so important to this administration why is Chump attending sporting events that cost $15 to $20 million a pop.

If spending was so important to this administration why is Chump going to have a dumb military parade like authoritarian governments have. Cost in estimation of $45 million. A tank rides down the street. Who in the so and so cares? How is that saving money? Are you in favor of this dumb parade?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
Could have just downsized agencies by attrition; when people retire do not replace them. There are downsizing precedents for doing just that. Eliminates the arbitrary and politicized nature of who goes, will reduce the workforce by about 5% every year, and will get rid of the highest paid employees.
Yeah like a buyout to retire. Companies do this all the time. Or some kind of severance package for 6 months. I thought Chump was a good businessman. This is not how you treat folks that worked for years.
 
Yeah like a buyout to retire. Companies do this all the time. Or some kind of severance package for 6 months. I thought Chump was a good businessman. This is not how you treat folks that worked for years.
Not even necessary and that is expensive.

If you do NOTHING, but don't replace retiring workers, about 5% will leave each year. It's a 20 year career to pension eligibility (which many will immediately exercise upon eligibility), + some leave for private industry each year. That is easy, not arbitrary/politicized, gets rid of the highest paid workers, doesn't allow the process to be politicized, and is guaranteed to be an effective means of workforce reduction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
It's a fine line between cutting back bloated government programs (good) and arbitrarily eliminating necessary programs that won't heed to political wishes (bad).

IMO DOGE has done both of those things.
I think it's an overly simplistic view to assume that DOGE went in and started randomly eliminating govt programs and spending without a very thorough and deep analysis of the risk/reward. The MSM and libs have portrayed this as Musk throwing darts at board and if he hit a certain program, then it was eliminated. (and the gullible portion of the public bought into it).
Granted, some programs that were super heavy on DEI or things like giving US taxpayer money to support a trans opera in Peru were probably eliminated after ready a few sentences about the program, but that's probably a very small percentage of the cuts falling under those circumstances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Could have just downsized agencies by attrition; when people retire do not replace them. There are downsizing precedents for doing just that. Eliminates the arbitrary and politicized nature of who goes, will reduce the workforce by about 5% every year, and will get rid of the highest paid employees.
You and BNI are looking at govt jobs as being a lifetime guarantee of employment. Trump is looking at running the govt like a private business. That's a good thing.
 
If spending was so important to this administration why is Chump attending sporting events that cost $15 to $20 million a pop.

If spending was so important to this administration why is Chump going to have a dumb military parade like authoritarian governments have. Cost in estimation of $45 million. A tank rides down the street. Who in the so and so cares? How is that saving money? Are you in favor of this dumb parade?
I'm interested to see your sources on where these cost figures come from? If it's some commentator on Urban radio, I wouldn't put much faith in it.
 
Yeah like a buyout to retire. Companies do this all the time. Or some kind of severance package for 6 months. I thought Chump was a good businessman. This is not how you treat folks that worked for years.
Again, provide a proof source that shows people with tenure and years of service were provided with a separation package.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
You and BNI are looking at govt jobs as being a lifetime guarantee of employment. Trump is looking at running the govt like a private business. That's a good thing.
You fell asleep in civics class in high school didn't you? The US government is a congressional republic. Running the US government like a private business does not work. May work in authoritarian governments in which Chump seems to admire.

Answer my questions.
Do you support spending $20 million dollars for a president to attend the Super Bowl?

Do you support spending $45 million dollars for a military parade to watch a tank go down the street?
 
Again, provide a proof source that shows people with tenure and years of service were provided with a separation package.
I did not say that they were provided a severance package. I just thought that they should have been given a severance package. instead of just put out on the street. A lot of military veterans are federal workers.

None of this DOGE crap is getting the price of consumer prices down.

What is DOGE going to do about corporate greed like the Walton family raising prices at Walmart. Could be tariff related. Another bad decision by this jacked up administration.
 
You fell asleep in civics class in high school didn't you? The US government is a congressional republic. Running the US government like a private business does not work. May work in authoritarian governments in which Chump seems to admire.

Answer my questions.
Do you support spending $20 million dollars for a president to attend the Super Bowl?

Do you support spending $45 million dollars for a military parade to watch a tank go down the street?
Again, what references are you using to claim these numbers are accurate? If you show me a reliable, unbiased source that had definitive, quantifiable data, then I'll listen.
But, again, Urban radio is not a reliable source (nor is The View).
 
.
@bonefish1 -- you asked if I'm a liberal? Here comes the free market, limited government perspective -- this is a prime example.

HELL NO! It is often full-on government overreach to pick and choose which industries get tax incentives. Let the market determine how much people get paid. Giving waiters and bartenders a tax break over construction workers, teachers, Walmart clerks; you name it? WTF!

The primary justification I could accept for an industry-specific income tax break would be to incentivize an under-populated and necessary profession. Can't get enough farm workers or air traffic controllers because it's too demanding or too complex to attract quality candidates? Then; sure. But bartenders and such? Government overreach defined.

.
It is not an 'industry'. It is anyone who gets tips.

How are you coming on finding leaders of other countries who are mocking Trump?
 
You fell asleep in civics class in high school didn't you? The US government is a congressional republic. Running the US government like a private business does not work. May work in authoritarian governments in which Chump seems to admire.

Answer my questions.
Do you support spending $20 million dollars for a president to attend the Super Bowl?

Do you support spending $45 million dollars for a military parade to watch a tank go down the street?
again, a govt job is not a guaranteed job for life. Otherwise, show me where I can sign up so I can just kick back and collect a paycheck with unlimited job security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Not even necessary and that is expensive.

If you do NOTHING, but don't replace retiring workers, about 5% will leave each year. It's a 20 year career to pension eligibility (which many will immediately exercise upon eligibility), + some leave for private industry each year. That is easy, not arbitrary/politicized, gets rid of the highest paid workers, doesn't allow the process to be politicized, and is guaranteed to be an effective means of workforce reduction.
Being on a job for 20 years and getting pension benefits needs to be changed.
 
It is not an 'industry'. It is anyone who gets tips.

How are you coming on finding leaders of other countries who are mocking Trump?
So hairdressers, bartenders, waiters and waitresses, hotel workers.

Pretty sure those are the primary beneficiaries. Maybe I’m missing a couple of occupations, but that’s arbitrary and government overreach in my opinion.

Oh, and it’s not just world leaders that think Trump is a laughingstock. His own staff and cabinet mocks him behind his back all. the. time. When the president is old, fat, senile, easily manipulated and distracted, stupid, and plastered with 2 inches of orange drag queen makeup it happens.

And I’m not going to play your passive aggressive games—if I list one example you’ll say “is that all?” If I link 20 examples you’ll pick away at one of them. There are too many examples to list—you know how to use the internet—look it up.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Boilermaker03
So hairdressers, bartenders, waiters and waitresses, hotel workers.

Pretty sure those are the primary beneficiaries. Maybe I’m missing a couple of occupations, but that’s arbitrary and government overreach in my opinion.

Oh, and it’s not just world leaders that think Trump is a laughingstock. His own staff and cabinet mocks him behind his back all. the. time. When the president is old, fat, senile, easily manipulated and distracted, stupid, and plastered with 2 inches of orange drag queen makeup it happens.

And I’m not going to play your passive aggressive games—if I list one example you’ll say “is that all?” If I link 20 examples you’ll pick away at one of them. There are too many examples to list—you know how to use the internet—look it up.
I didn’t know Trumps staff mocked him all the time. Glad to have you for the insight on things going on behind the scenes.
 
Oh, and it’s not just world leaders that think Trump is a laughingstock. His own staff and cabinet mocks him behind his back all. the. time. When the president is old, fat, senile, easily manipulated and distracted, stupid, and plastered with 2 inches of orange drag queen makeup it happens.

And I’m not going to play your passive aggressive games—if I list one example you’ll say “is that all?” If I link 20 examples you’ll pick away at one of them. There are too many examples to list—you know how to use the internet—look it up.
Never mind. I see that you were just parroting what you heard from an msnbc hack, so you have no way to back it up.

 
Never mind. I see that you were just parroting what you heard from an msnbc hack, so you have no way to back it up.

I don't watch or read MSNBC. AND AS I JUST STATED...

"And I’m not going to play your passive aggressive games—if I list one example you’ll say “is that all?” If I link 20 examples you’ll pick away at one of them. There are too many examples to list—you know how to use the internet—look it up."

But predictably, you did the childish/passive-aggressive thing anyway, because that is how you are and who you are.
 
I don't watch or read MSNBC. AND AS I JUST STATED...

"And I’m not going to play your passive aggressive games—if I list one example you’ll say “is that all?” If I link 20 examples you’ll pick away at one of them. There are too many examples to list—you know how to use the internet—look it up."

But predictably, you did the childish/passive-aggressive thing anyway, because that is how you are and who you are.
I googled 'Trump is a laughingstock' and got warmonger John Bolton and the msnbc hack saying it. No world leaders.

This fits the pattern of you blurting out TDS rhetoric that you cannot back up.
 
That is why I have always said that the price increases are due to greed, price gouging.

These greedy so and so's have also been doing shrinkflation for decades and its continuing. The packaging of stuff is smaller when the price stays the same or even increase. But yet folks want to give these folks tax breaks.
This is so wrong. It's not greed, it's inflation. The dollar isn't worth as much thus products cost more.

Do you really think that every product from every industry went up because every single person running those companies got greedy all at once? That's just lunacy.

Ever think that it's possible product prices go up and amounts you get go down due to OTHER countries tariffs???
 
Last edited:
I don’t know. Maybe it worked for them. I think tariffs worked for the US in the 2000s when Bush the Younger put a 10% tariff on China steel. Did not cause a trade war. Chump got too greedy trying to use tariffs for US income and it ain’t and will not work.
I see, so tariffs work for other countries, but not the US. Interesting dynamic there.
 
Last edited:
Never mind. I see that you were just parroting what you heard from an msnbc hack, so you have no way to back it up.

That dude is a moron. In fact, just about everyone on MSNBC are morons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT