ADVERTISEMENT

IU gets to play us for a bowl game

Dusty banners don't matter (even IU is still ranked #3 all time in NC's), but having only 3 of 11 head coaches since 1947 with winning records does: got it.
Well,like I said,IU fans have to bring basketball into a football discussion.You must be awful nervous to keep hanging onto those banners.Take a chill pill and have a pleasant evening.
 
Well,like I said,IU fans have to bring basketball into a football discussion.You must be awful nervous to keep hanging onto those banners.Take a chill pill and have a pleasant evening.

I still don't understand what I'm supposed to be nervous about. Do you mean like hanging onto Joe Tiller like he is somehow the norm and not the exception, or how your AD's flagship program is currently #11 in the Big 10? If this is the case, I think you should be much more nervous: IU basketball is much more likely to rebound and has a much higher ceiling than PU football.
 
Last edited:
You have done better but you're still in the East division where it'll always be hard to become bowl eligible unless you load up with cupcake non-conference teams like you did this year. It'll be much easier for Purdue to rise in the West since we don't have to worry about the Ohio States, Michigans, Michigan States, and Penn States.
My point exactly. Purdue is in a big cupcake division and you can not win and you are not getting better you are getting worse. You are really close to the Kansas University level of bad.
 
I truly believe that we will all eventually see some type of super-conference that takes the OSUs, Alabamas, Michigans of the world and has them in their own independent alignment. This conference will have guaranteed spots in the BCS playoffs every year. There is no need for schools like IU, Purdue and Illinois who bleed the bowl revenue from those elite schools who carry the conference with revenue-sharing. Not sure I understand the incentive for OSU to be affiliated with the little guys other than to provide a cupcake win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indyogb
I truly believe that we will all eventually see some type of super-conference that takes the OSUs, Alabamas, Michigans of the world and has them in their own independent alignment. This conference will have guaranteed spots in the BCS playoffs every year. There is no need for schools like IU, Purdue and Illinois who bleed the bowl revenue from those elite schools who carry the conference with revenue-sharing. Not sure I understand the incentive for OSU to be affiliated with the little guys other than to provide a cupcake win.

Will never happen for the reason you mentioned. If those programs start playing one another, most of them will go from elite to either average or bad. Their egos couldn't stand it. They will keep sharing revenue so they can continue to be elite.
 
My point exactly. Purdue is in a big cupcake division and you can not win and you are not getting better you are getting worse. You are really close to the Kansas University level of bad.

The point you don't seem to get that even though Purdue is exactly as bad as you say they are, IU is not a whole lot better. This is like bragging about being the tallest midget. Congrats.
 
I still don't understand what I'm supposed to be nervous about. Do you mean like hanging onto Joe Tiller like he is somehow the norm and not the exception, or how your AD's flagship program is currently #11 in the Big 10? If this is the case, I think you should be much more nervous: IU basketball is much more likely to rebound and has a much higher ceiling than PU football.
Who said football is Purdues flagship program?After all,Purdue has 20 plus more wins than the Hoosiers in their long running basketball rivalry,and Matt Painter has beaten Tom Crean 8 times out of 12.You don't like to be teased about those banners,do you?
 
I truly believe that we will all eventually see some type of super-conference that takes the OSUs, Alabamas, Michigans of the world and has them in their own independent alignment. This conference will have guaranteed spots in the BCS playoffs every year. There is no need for schools like IU, Purdue and Illinois who bleed the bowl revenue from those elite schools who carry the conference with revenue-sharing. Not sure I understand the incentive for OSU to be affiliated with the little guys other than to provide a cupcake win.
You may be right,but I hope not.
 
Since 1947, 3 of 11 Purdue coaches have had winning records: the pride of the Purdue athletic department right here. Once again, you are dangerously close to pot calling the kettle black territory and sound like the IU fans that PU fans accuse of celebrating dusty banners, the difference being this: your football program hasn't come close to flying as high as IU's basketball program has, nor does it have the tradition and support to make a rebound as feasible.

If you want to argue that you have the top bunk in the Big Ten football cellar, be my guest.
Good God, you Loosiers are idiots. Here are some cold, hard facts for you:

Purdue All-Time Record: 598-544-48 (.523)
8 BIG Championships, 12 Conference Titles total
17 bowls (9-8 overall)

IU All-Time Record: 459-631-45 (.424)
2 BIG Championships
9 bowls (3-6 overall)

Purdue has gone to 12 bowls since 1993.
IU has gone to 2 bowls since 1993.
Head-to-head: Purdue 72 IU 39 Ties 6

Purdue is significantly better than IU historically and has owned the Loosiers. Face it, IU's program is historically bad. In fact, one of the very worst programs in the history of college football, and I believe the worst in BIG history. (Northwestern and Rutgers might give IU a run for its money on this account.)

One last thing, Wake Forest 82, Loosiers 78 - Tom Crean, the gift that keeps on giving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: loftygoal
Who said football is Purdues flagship program?After all,Purdue has 20 plus more wins than the Hoosiers in their long running basketball rivalry,and Matt Painter has beaten Tom Crean 8 times out of 12.You don't like to be teased about those banners,do you?

PU has never done anything on a national level: never have, never will. Those 20 wins are a relic of the pre-NCAA era: IU has erased about half the margin and are a good hire away from erasing the rest. Crean is definitely a joke and should have been gone by now: no way he lasts this season. That being said, Painter is good for PU, but isn't close to an elite coach, either.

I'll take dusty banners, tied for 3rd all time, and the tradition and support to be elite over nothing any day of the week. That is like saying you would rather be Purdue in football than Notre Dame.
 
Good God, you Loosiers are idiots. Here are some cold, hard facts for you:

Purdue All-Time Record: 598-544-48 (.523)
8 BIG Championships, 12 Conference Titles total
17 bowls (9-8 overall)

IU All-Time Record: 459-631-45 (.424)
2 BIG Championships
9 bowls (3-6 overall)

Purdue has gone to 12 bowls since 1993.
IU has gone to 2 bowls since 1993.
Head-to-head: Purdue 72 IU 39 Ties 6

Purdue is significantly better than IU historically and has owned the Loosiers. Face it, IU's program is historically bad. In fact, one of the very worst programs in the history of college football, and I believe the worst in BIG history. (Northwestern and Rutgers might give IU a run for its money on this account.)

One last thing, Wake Forest 82, Loosiers 78 - Tom Crean, the gift that keeps on giving.
Thanks for the post.I guess the IU basketball team left their high ceiling in Gloomington.Maybe they need to take the banners when they travel.
 
PU has never done anything on a national level: never have, never will. Those 20 wins are a relic of the pre-NCAA era: IU has erased about half the margin and are a good hire away from erasing the rest. Crean is definitely a joke and should have been gone by now: no way he lasts this season. That being said, Painter is good for PU, but isn't close to an elite coach, either.

I'll take dusty banners, tied for 3rd all time, and the tradition and support to be elite over nothing any day of the week. That is like saying you would rather be Purdue in football than Notre Dame.
The pre NCAA era ?IU needed those banners today in Maui,didnt they?
 
Yeah, but you are #11 in the Big Ten. Historically, you guys suck, just a little bit less. Typically, you don't measure your program against one team, but every other team.
 
The pre NCAA era ?IU needed those banners today in Maui,didnt they?

Having 0 banners and being nationally irrelevant is awesome and is no doubt superior to having tradition. I'm sure that will all turn around for you guys this year.

IU losses will only bring Crean's departure sooner and a coach like Brad Stevens or Gregg Marshall sooner: fine by me. Seriously, what would you do if Stevens became IU's head coach? It would be close to another Knight era.
 
Yeah, but you are #11 in the Big Ten. Historically, you guys suck, just a little bit less. Typically, you don't measure your program against one team, but every other team.
Do you really want to measure IUs football history against all other schools?
 
Having 0 banners and being nationally irrelevant is awesome and is no doubt superior to having tradition. I'm sure that will all turn around for you guys this year.

IU losses will only bring Crean's departure sooner and a coach like Brad Stevens or Gregg Marshall sooner: fine by me. Seriously, what would you do if Stevens became IU's head coach? It would be close to another Knight era.
You are like a Chicago Bear fan who cant shut up about their 1985 team.Why are some people sure Brad Stevens wants to come to IU.Bob Knight beat Purdue 31 Times ,to 29 wins for Purdue.Since Purdue leads by 27 games ,the next Hoosier coach who is as good as Knight was against Purdue,would only need about 400 years to even the series.Will Bob Knight ever come back to Bloomington or is he going to pout forever?
 
Last edited:
Only five plays from a winless season ... everyone knows about the Saluki who dropped the game-winner, the Hilltoppers leaving halftime in a fog, the Deacons who were bored with their foe, the Twerps, ... and what the heck is FIU? ... besides the way everyone refers to IU?

Banners? A single Boilermaker won twice that many, and he did it inside a 12-year span.
 
Having 0 banners and being nationally irrelevant is awesome and is no doubt superior to having tradition. I'm sure that will all turn around for you guys this year.

IU losses will only bring Crean's departure sooner and a coach like Brad Stevens or Gregg Marshall sooner: fine by me. Seriously, what would you do if Stevens became IU's head coach? It would be close to another Knight era.
Have you really posted multiple times to argue that your football team sucks less than Purdue?
Congrats.
Now go celebrate the Wake Forest loss.
Loosiers.
 
The Truth has spoken, we are all amazed with such knowledge that means absolutely nothing to no one but he thinks he is saying something , so let him rant on while we roll our eyes.
 
Thanks for the post.I guess the IU basketball team left their high ceiling in Gloomington.Maybe they need to take the banners when they travel.


It's funny, when it comes to basketball success, IU's history is "dusty" and shouldn't be mentioned according to Purdue fans. But you're very quick to bring up IU's football history to prove a point. No, IU doesn't have a good football history - no IU fan claims it does - but if we're not acknowledging the long past, it looks to me like recent history favors IU football in the last three bucket games.
 
It's funny, when it comes to basketball success, IU's history is "dusty" and shouldn't be mentioned according to Purdue fans. But you're very quick to bring up IU's football history to prove a point. No, IU doesn't have a good football history - no IU fan claims it does - but if we're not acknowledging the long past, it looks to me like recent history favors IU football in the last three bucket games.
Yes,you are right about recent history.And that other IU fan,Mr Truth is the one who brought basketball into a football discussion.
 
IU's football history sucks and IU's recent basketball history is nothing to brag about. Any IU fan that says otherwise is fooling him or herself.

That being said, IU's recent history in the bucket game is noteworthy. :)
 
IU's football history sucks and IU's recent basketball history is nothing to brag about. Any IU fan that says otherwise is fooling him or herself.

That being said, IU's recent history in the bucket game is noteworthy. :)
You are correct.Its too bad Purdue cant afford to can Hazell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FLAG HUNTER
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT