Is IU still a blue blood ?

[Boiler Wolf]

I hate IU but they def have more than 2 Final Four appearances from 81-2016. Maybe you meant National Titles for the 2. But idk where you got your stats from.

Should have been 91 to 16, last 25 years. Typo, I corrected it.

 

[Purdue0034]

Man! This is a post that should be deleted. To me it is pretty embarrassing! Anyway, since I am here however, I will take the opportunity to comment... In no way is Indiana currently a blue blood. It is not even a question. Once a blue blood, does not make you forever a blue blood. From 1975 to 1987, I would say yes. No title since 1987, almost 30 years ago, your blue blood status is revoked!

 

[hoosier48]

Man! This is a post that should be deleted. To me it is pretty embarrassing! Anyway, since I am here however, I will take the opportunity to comment... In no way is Indiana currently a blue blood. It is not even a question. Once a blue blood, does not make you forever a blue blood. From 1975 to 1987, I would say yes. No title since 1987, almost 30 years ago, your blue blood status is revoked!

Yeah there is a difference between blue blood and elite. Currently IU fits neither just great history a bit like UCLA.
Kids now days could care less about history. To me one coaching change can change everything in a hurry. Purdue and IU have probably both hit the ceiling under current coaches.
Face it, we are settlers...

 

[indianascout1991]

Man! This is a post that should be deleted. To me it is pretty embarrassing! Anyway, since I am here however, I will take the opportunity to comment... In no way is Indiana currently a blue blood. It is not even a question. Once a blue blood, does not make you forever a blue blood. From 1975 to 1987, I would say yes. No title since 1987, almost 30 years ago, your blue blood status is revoked!

UCONN has won 4 since UCLA won their last one. I think UCLA's status should be revoked as well. That's 21 years.

 

[hoosier48]

UCONN has won 4 since UCLA won their last one. I think UCLA's status should be revoked as well. That's 21 years.

Wow, that's an interesting comment to say the least. The won like 10 straight titles and a win streak that will never be broke and prob not the titles either no to mention they are currently undefeated and recruiting like they could win another. Glad you don't have a true say, that's just silly...

 

[jadeezra]

Yeah there is a difference between blue blood and elite. Currently IU fits neither just great history a bit like UCLA.
Kids now days could care less about history. To me one coaching change can change everything in a hurry. Purdue and IU have probably both hit the ceiling under current coaches.
Face it, we are settlers...

I can agree with your last sentence 100%

 

[fkfootball]

Heck, I think IU is more relevant than UCLA. Although IU and UCLA both needed a splash hire in their last coaching search and came up with uninspiring hires.