And their hyped self proclaimed Heisman candidate has been a non-factor. That is all...
It's Indinia.And their hyped self proclaimed Heisman candidate has been a non-factor. That is all...
Right now UC is a top ten team. After watching them Saturday I'd say it doesn't take much to be a top ten team this year.OK so they've proven they aren't a top ten team. I'm still going to hold off until after the Bucket game before I bury them. They could disappoint all season long but if they win that game then we have no room to talk. And frankly, a loss to a top ten team and a loss at Iowa aren't exactly bad losses.
Top ten team. Top twenty team. Whatever they end up being, I don't think losing to them is embarrassing or the end of the world. They'll play and beat Western Kentucky this upcoming Saturday and then 4 of their following 5 games are against currently-ranked competition. We'll see what they do in that stretch.Right now UC is a top ten team. After watching them Saturday I'd say it doesn't take much to be a top ten team this year.
I don’t get this. They haven’t beaten us in hoops since the Obama Administration but that doesn’t keep them from talking smack 24-7.OK so they've proven they aren't a top ten team. I'm still going to hold off until after the Bucket game before I bury them. They could disappoint all season long but if they win that game then we have no room to talk. And frankly, a loss to a top ten team and a loss at Iowa aren't exactly bad losses.
Don't you think they look like complete idiots when they do? I do and I don't want to look like a complete idiot.I don’t get this. They haven’t beaten us in hoops since the Obama Administration but that doesn’t keep them from talking smack 24-7.
Don't you think they look like complete idiots when they do? I do and I don't want to look like a complete idiot.
Minnesota will beat them. Had no idea that Penix was a sitting duck now going into the seasonLatest ESPN FPI for them has them at four wins for the season now. Of course that means they have to win at Western Kentucky.
They also have them getting Wins at home against Rutgers and Minnesota. Those are barely above 50% chance of winning, so those will probably flip by game time.
Purdue is currently projected for 6 wins this season and that's with a loss at Nebraska.
We are both facing 'let's see what the rest of the season looks like' mantra.So far this year, IU is suffering from mental injuries just like Purdue suffered from physical injuries the last two years. Iowa was a train wreck, but IU's mental errors, both coaches and players, handed the game to UC. Shoulda, woulda, coulda, be (been) 2-1 and a quality team would be. We'll see what the rest of the season looks like.
I agree.UC won somewhat because IU imploded.Allowing that kickoff return for a score was absurd.Right now UC is a top ten team. After watching them Saturday I'd say it doesn't take much to be a top ten team this year.
Exactly. Who has Purdue lost to injury? I can only think of Bell and Trice. As for Fryfogle, he read too many of his press clippings.We are both facing 'let's see what the rest of the season looks like' mantra.
PU has lost six starters already, 2 for the season before the first snap. Looking like 2019 again.
Can Penix do a 180 and become good again? Is Fryfogle on a downward confidence spiral?
Horvath,Washington and Rice.We thought in the preseason we would have Watts but we dont.Exactly. Who has Purdue lost to injury? I can only think of Bell and Trice. As for Fryfogle, he read too many of his press clippings.
That's not what makes you look like a complete idiot...Don't you think they look like complete idiots when they do? I do and I don't want to look like a complete idiot.
Thanks. I knew about Horvath, but the memory is aging. Was Rice a starter?Horvath,Washington and Rice.We thought in the preseason we would have Watts but we dont.
Bell, 3 offensive linemen, Mershawn Rice, Horvath, Trice. I can keep going if you'd like...Exactly. Who has Purdue lost to injury? I can only think of Bell and Trice. As for Fryfogle, he read too many of his press clippings.
Says someone who was complaining about the offensive line in week 1 when everyone on the board knew about it all offseason.That's not what makes you look like a complete idiot...
Who says I didn't know about it all offseason? But to say as a coach you continue to work hard on the run game and then make no improvement whatsoever, there's reason to complain in week 1. The funny part is I bitch about something tangible. All you bitch about is people bitching about something tangible...Says someone who was complaining about the offensive line in week 1 when everyone on the board knew about it all offseason.
No,but he backed up Bell and if both are out Saturday,the number three guy at WR must step up.Thanks. I knew about Horvath, but the memory is aging. Was Rice a starter?
I bitch about people acting like a complete idiot. Sorry you qualified. Do better.Who says I didn't know about it all offseason? But to say as a coach you continue to work hard on the run game and then make no improvement whatsoever, there's reason to complain in week 1. The funny part is I bitch about something tangible. All you bitch about is people bitching about something tangible...
Interesting. I'd say you qualify for at least 2 things.I bitch about people acting like a complete idiot. Sorry you qualified. Do better.
I'm not surprised that's what you think.Interesting. I'd say you qualify for at least 2 things.
1) Thinking you're smarter than you really are.
2). Being a dick to everyone you "think" you're smarter than...
Starting DL, starting MLB, starting RB - Horvath. Don't remember the names of the other 2. Looks like a few more now.Exactly. Who has Purdue lost to injury? I can only think of Bell and Trice. As for Fryfogle, he read too many of his press clippings.
Fair, but, the bigger point is all of the national attention and acclaim that they were receiving that was not warranted...last year could not have been more of a fluke, and, somehow, despite the folks down south not acknowledging it and proclaiming otherwise, they managed to convince others (many others) that it was not as well.OK so they've proven they aren't a top ten team. I'm still going to hold off until after the Bucket game before I bury them. They could disappoint all season long but if they win that game then we have no room to talk. And frankly, a loss to a top ten team and a loss at Iowa aren't exactly bad losses.
You already have seen what it looks like...Iowa and Cincy were reality checks and a glimpse into what lies ahead.So far this year, IU is suffering from mental injuries just like Purdue suffered from physical injuries the last two years. Iowa was a train wreck, but IU's mental errors, both coaches and players, handed the game to UC. Shoulda, woulda, coulda, be (been) 2-1 and a quality team would be. We'll see what the rest of the season looks like.
You may be wrong for all I know but you may be right.You already have seen what it looks like...Iowa and Cincy were reality checks and a glimpse into what lies ahead.
You may be wrong for all I know but you may be right.
Catch ya later in the season you Lunatic.![]()
I think even the most optimist IU fans thought being 3-0 would be a stretch at this point, I know I had them splitting with Iowa/Cincy. I don't think IU being 1-2 right now is as big of a shock as to how they are 1-2. I don't think you could have scripted a worse start for Penix, something is going on between his ears as I don't think he is mentally over his last surgery.Fair, but, the bigger point is all of the national attention and acclaim that they were receiving that was not warranted...last year could not have been more of a fluke, and, somehow, despite the folks down south not acknowledging it and proclaiming otherwise, they managed to convince others (many others) that it was not as well.
Their losses are not bad losses per se, but, they are losses that IU had counted as wins before the games were even played.
They are not a top ten team...they never were...and, they were not a top 25 team this year (or deserving of it either).
That said, like you, I am not burying them either until after the Bucket game...but, if that result does go Purdue's way...I will absolutely be burying them.
I'd argue he's been a HUGE factor. Just the not the kind I was hoping for. Too many Hoosier fans were blinded to the possibility of the season shaking out like this and are wallowing in some self-pity right now.And their hyped self proclaimed Heisman candidate has been a non-factor. That is all...
I'm in that boat.I'd argue he's been a HUGE factor. Just the not the kind I was hoping for. Too many Hoosier fans were blinded to the possibility of the season shaking out like this and are wallowing in some self-pity right now.
They were not as good as believed...last year, or, coming in to this one (that was clear in the Bowl game against the Ole Miss JV squad) and there is no way that you (or anyone else that had fooled themselves into believing that IU was a legit top 20 team coming in) had them losing to Cincy at home before the season.I think even the most optimist IU fans thought being 3-0 would be a stretch at this point, I know I had them splitting with Iowa/Cincy. I don't think IU being 1-2 right now is as big of a shock as to how they are 1-2. I don't think you could have scripted a worse start for Penix, something is going on between his ears as I don't think he is mentally over his last surgery.
Not sure anyone ever claimed IU was a top ten team preseason or that they are now, but were definitely worthy of a preseason top 25 ranking based on returning production. 3 games in with two losses to really good teams changes that narrative, but definitely were deserving of a top 25 ranking.
8 wins (which I had hoped for) seems like a real longshot at this point, but defense is good enough to keep them in just about every game from here on out and even just a functioning offense could change the tide for the rest of the season.
I'm not sure what you mean by as good as you believed? I thought IU was a legit top 20 team last year. I understand their opponents SOS wasn't great last year but that is out of IU's control. IU had a very stout defense and a good offense. That Ole Miss lost isn't what people make it out to be. That Ole Miss JV squad is going to be a tough out this year and that QB is a potential Heisman winner. I thought IU would split between Iowa and Cincy. I thought Iowa was the better match-up of the two but playing in Kinnick in front of fans for the first time in two years could be problematic. They kicked our butts.They were not as good as believed...last year, or, coming in to this one (that was clear in the Bowl game against the Ole Miss JV squad) and there is no way that you (or anyone else that had fooled themselves into believing that IU was a legit top 20 team coming in) had them losing to Cincy at home before the season.
Not sure how Penix was overrated? Injury-prone sure, but he's been a proven QB (until now) every time he's taken the field. Unfortunately, I think injuries have taken their toll and not something he's going to be able to overcome.Penix could not have been more overrated, and, while his injury indeed took a toll unfortunately, he is a shell of who/what he was...but, the notion that so many around that program had and shared that he was a Heisman candidate and 1st Round NFL prospect was laughable.
8-4 is what I believed IU would finish this year. I believed that was a reasonable outcome. However, it is a pipe dream as it stands. I do think bowl eligibility is more than attainable at this point, just need to play better. Defense is fine. Having semi-competent QB would go a long way. Hell they'd be 2-1 at this point if that were the case.8 wins, at this point, seems like a legitimate pipe dream...the focus at the moment seemingly should be finding a way to get into a bowl game, as, if that does not happen...there would be no greater indictment, and, no greater proof that last year was indeed the fluke that so many outside of that program believe(d) it to be.
Cincinnati has a good offense. They have an NFL QB who will be a late first-early 2nd rd pick, a transfer RB from Alabama who will play in the NFL and a solid and experienced offensive line. Not ready to say they are a top 10 team (there's only 3-4 teams who stand out so far) but they are much better than you give them credit for. IU's defense did more than enough to win that game Saturday (as they did Iowa) but the offense and special teams costed them dearly.You suggest that the defense is "good enough", but, it has not been tested to truly know that...Iowa is challenged to say the least offensively...and, while Cincy is better, I think even the most diehard fan would have to admit that THAT team is not a Top 10 team (much like ND is not the 12th best team in the country)...never mind...it is Cincinnati.