you try oh so hard don't you? lol
How can you ignore what is clearly true? It is profound that anyone would make light of what Hillary has done. It is a deliberate attack on Americans. She attacked the country and then lied about it to your face and everyone else's. People get killed in this country for a lot less than stealing a dollar and she gets away with this publicly? Do you realize the consequences for America if she gets away with that crime? You might as well put up a sign for Hitler to rise, because that's exactly where this leads next. Snowden had to move to Russia for his freedom because he merely leaked an illegal operation against the US citizens with bulk surveillance so the government can keep communist and fascist style dossiers on the population. And it is so over the top brazen that Nixon got impeached for something a million times less criminal yet incredibly evil, but Hillary can tell Congress to go to hell? That is amazingly seditious and outright infinitely treacherous; ultimate betrayal. Yet she was actually having the US embassy attacked just so terrorists can be armed so the government (secret society members running it) can use that terrorism to create a world government under foreign control. Not only is that treason militarily speaking, but that is ideological sedition against the Declaration of Independence and Constitution. And it is those two documents that soldiers go to war for. So it isn't just a betrayal to just the non-military population, but it is treason against the military as well. So they can use those terrorist attacks and literally live through them vicariously and run them behind the scenes, and then demand the public become servile to an international government Hitlerian Welthauptstdadt Germania style New World Order. It is the ultimate crime. That is the ultimate espionage. That is the ultimate treason.
They even admit that Mussolini was a British Agent. All the New World Order represents is a plan by the secret societies that came from Germanic royalty and took over England, and carried that out on the United States; Cecile Rhodes put that in his will & testament. So did Carroll Quigley at Georgetown, who wrote a book about it. He even put the US flag upside down and wrapped inside a larger British flag to punk stomp laughingly all these stupid old ninny professors in lessor colleges who froth nonsense at students all day. He wrote a book about it to symbolize just how in the face treason it is, though he being one of their top war college operatives and think tank social engineers was for this simply because he thought they'd go forward with a world war III model before they'd even try and give up control for sanity to take back control.
totally admitted
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy
Quigley even put it in his book Tragedy & Hope, a book that was meant strictly for the State Department, who later tried to have the book prevented from print and took the plates for the original print, of which now there is a missing chapter. A full fledged admission and yet this guy was Clinton's most revered and highly regarded professor and so much so he bragged about it during his inauguration ceremony. It is actually beyond treason. This is just frothing evil. This is so monstrous that the average American can only call it a conspiracy theory because they can't even wrap their mind around it so they literally would rather attack anyone who talks about it because it makes them look so pathetic and weak for not knowing about it for the danger we are all faced with now.
In 1891, Cecile Rhodes organized a secret society with members in a "Circle of Initiates" and an outer circle known as the "Association of Helpers" later organized as the Round Table organization. In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups known as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States. In 1919, they founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and the United States where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations. After 1925, the Institute of Pacific Relations was set up in twelve Pacific area countries.
They were constantly harping on the lessons to be learned from the failure of the American Revolution and the success of the Canadian federation of 1867 and hoped
to federate the various parts of the empire and then confederate the whole with the United Kingdom. There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. CARROLL QUIGLEY (TRAGEDY & HOPE)
It is so embarrassing that anyone would support these people. It is like someone burning down your house and then that same person votes for the person who then throws them off a tall building in return. It is plain filthy to vote for these people. George Washington fought the Illuminati to the bitter end. This was the real American Revolution. It wasn't against just the British. It was about a Germanic death cult of demons who took over the British who then took over the US. And the petty little slob professor can froth ignorance all day. This is boldly defined in the Library of Congress. Just because they didn't put it in their punk text books isn't going to make this go away. It is there for anyone to go find out about.
It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am. The idea that I meant to convey, was, that I did not believe that the Lodges of Free Masons in this Country had, as Societies, endeavoured to propagate the diabolical tenets of the first, or pernicious principles of the latter if they are susceptible of separation. That Individuals of them may have done it, or that the founder, or instrument employed to found, the Democratic Societies in the United States, may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the People from their Government in view, is too evident to be questioned. George Washington (October 24, 1798, Mount Vernon, in The Writings of George Washington, vol. 20, p. 518)
