Entire paper was written by Grok 3. No input was given other than feeding the sources and correcting citations.
47 peer reviewed papers were used.
-23 were pro climate change
-3 were neutral
-21 were skeptical papers
Conclusions:
-Human C02 is not detectable in the atmosphere
-Temperature records are heavily adjusted. Without the adjustments there's no warming
-Total Solar Energy (TSI) is hard to measure and IPCC cherry picks one method out of many -not science (there are over 27 ways to calculate TSI)
It's not C02:
-Temperature causes C02, not the other way around
-C02 does not stay in the atmosphere long (3 or 4 years, not 100 to 10,000)
-Covid lockdowns drastically reduced C02 emissions but it wasn't noticeable in Mauna Loa C02 curve.
-Models over estimate warming by 3x-5x
From the paper:
The anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis, as articulated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and supported by researchers such as Mann, Schmidt, and Haus-father, lacks robust empirical support when subjected to rigorous scrutiny. This analysis integrates unadjusted observational data and recent peer-reviewed studies to demonstrate that the assertion of human CO₂ emissions as the primary driver of climate variability since 1750 is not substantiated. Instead, natural processes—including temperature feedbacks, solar variability, and oceanic dynamics—provide a more consistent explanation for observed trends.
Solar forcing presents a viable alternative mechanism.
47 peer reviewed papers were used.
-23 were pro climate change
-3 were neutral
-21 were skeptical papers
Conclusions:
-Human C02 is not detectable in the atmosphere
-Temperature records are heavily adjusted. Without the adjustments there's no warming
-Total Solar Energy (TSI) is hard to measure and IPCC cherry picks one method out of many -not science (there are over 27 ways to calculate TSI)
It's not C02:
-Temperature causes C02, not the other way around
-C02 does not stay in the atmosphere long (3 or 4 years, not 100 to 10,000)
-Covid lockdowns drastically reduced C02 emissions but it wasn't noticeable in Mauna Loa C02 curve.
-Models over estimate warming by 3x-5x
From the paper:
The anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis, as articulated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and supported by researchers such as Mann, Schmidt, and Haus-father, lacks robust empirical support when subjected to rigorous scrutiny. This analysis integrates unadjusted observational data and recent peer-reviewed studies to demonstrate that the assertion of human CO₂ emissions as the primary driver of climate variability since 1750 is not substantiated. Instead, natural processes—including temperature feedbacks, solar variability, and oceanic dynamics—provide a more consistent explanation for observed trends.
Solar forcing presents a viable alternative mechanism.
Last edited:
