My second thoughts are based on his "help" in our coach search that ended up with Hazell.With many on here clamoring for Grigson to come back to Purdue and be AD after Burke, have you had second thoughts based on the things coming out of Indy about his meddling and micromanagement of the Colts?
He has no business becoming AD at Purdue. None.With many on here clamoring for Grigson to come back to Purdue and be AD after Burke, have you had second thoughts based on the things coming out of Indy about his meddling and micromanagement of the Colts?
Don`t worry,Burk wants to stay until he`s 72.He has no business becoming AD at Purdue. None.
Don`t worry,Burk wants to stay until he`s 72.
I said before if he is so enamored with DH, then buy him out and take him. I am not a Colts fan, but to have a QB like Luck and NO OL to protect him, and Grigson played OL, what an idiot. Black eye for NWI being a Highland guy.With many on here clamoring for Grigson to come back to Purdue and be AD after Burke, have you had second thoughts based on the things coming out of Indy about his meddling and micromanagement of the Colts?
No he's not.Before you all blast Grigson for personnel choices, you have to realize that the head of personnel decisions for the colts is the pill popper president. As long as Irsay thinks he is a genius the colts will make these mistakes.
Colts needed OL and secondary last season and instead of the doing the smart thing, he drafted a WR and signed washed-up players (Frank Gore was the only one who did anything this season.)What he's done with the Colts? He took over a 2-14 team and built three straight 11-5 seasons, winning the NFL Executive of the Year trophy in the process. Now they've finished 8-8 without their star and after going five deep in quarterbacks with another dozen players on injured reserve.
Quit reading those IU hacks at the rag Star and use your Purdue common sense. It's not Grigson's job to be popular, especially not in the locker room. He can't get tied to the players. He has to shuffle them and the roster all year every year.
And his results have been a helluva lot better than the NFL norm.
What he's done with the Colts? He took over a 2-14 team and built three straight 11-5 seasons, winning the NFL Executive of the Year trophy in the process. Now they've finished 8-8 without their star and after going five deep in quarterbacks with another dozen players on injured reserve.
Quit reading those IU hacks at the rag Star and use your Purdue common sense. It's not Grigson's job to be popular, especially not in the locker room. He can't get tied to the players. He has to shuffle them and the roster all year every year.
And his results have been a helluva lot better than the NFL norm.
What he's done with the Colts? He took over a 2-14 team and built three straight 11-5 seasons, winning the NFL Executive of the Year trophy in the process. Now they've finished 8-8 without their star and after going five deep in quarterbacks with another dozen players on injured reserve.
Quit reading those IU hacks at the rag Star and use your Purdue common sense. It's not Grigson's job to be popular, especially not in the locker room. He can't get tied to the players. He has to shuffle them and the roster all year every year.
And his results have been a helluva lot better than the NFL norm.
Took over a 2-14 team? Sorry, gotta chuckle at that one. That 2-14 team was a 10-6 team from the previous year with Curtis Painter in place of injured Peyton Manning. Insert Andrew Luck and they pop back up to 11 wins. Do have to give him credit for drafting Luck, although bringing back Peyton probably would have worked out just as well.What he's done with the Colts? He took over a 2-14 team and built three straight 11-5 seasons, winning the NFL Executive of the Year trophy in the process. Now they've finished 8-8 without their star and after going five deep in quarterbacks with another dozen players on injured reserve.
Quit reading those IU hacks at the rag Star and use your Purdue common sense. It's not Grigson's job to be popular, especially not in the locker room. He can't get tied to the players. He has to shuffle them and the roster all year every year.
And his results have been a helluva lot better than the NFL norm.
don't follow the Colts, but anytime I watch them on TV the one thing that stands out is their OL is pretty bad.Took over a 2-14 team? Sorry, gotta chuckle at that one. That 2-14 team was a 10-6 team from the previous year with Curtis Painter in place of injured Peyton Manning. Insert Andrew Luck and they pop back up to 11 wins. Do have to give him credit for drafting Luck, although bringing back Peyton probably would have worked out just as well.
Best case, you can give him credit for sustaining (until this year) what Polian created. Worst case, you can now see the cracks in the foundation from poor decisions the past few years.
All that being said, I'm not exactly sure how much NFL GM translates to College AD.
Took over a 2-14 team? Sorry, gotta chuckle at that one. That 2-14 team was a 10-6 team from the previous year with Curtis Painter in place of injured Peyton Manning. Insert Andrew Luck and they pop back up to 11 wins. Do have to give him credit for drafting Luck, although bringing back Peyton probably would have worked out just as well.
Best case, you can give him credit for sustaining (until this year) what Polian created. Worst case, you can now see the cracks in the foundation from poor decisions the past few years.
All that being said, I'm not exactly sure how much NFL GM translates to College AD.
I'll give you 2012 as a good year for him. Since then he's been a disaster missing far more than hitting on his personnel decisions. Add the meddling of who plays or doesn't play and the Colts won't get any to coach them as long as he's there. He has to go.
He is a poor GM. Andrew Luck covered up a lot of mistakes. The Richardson trade alone was a fireable offense.
Colts needed OL and secondary last season and instead of the doing the smart thing, he drafted a WR and signed washed-up players (Frank Gore was the only one who did anything this season.)
Division champs in a division with the mighty Jacksonville Jaguars and their last winning season in 2008. Perennial playoff team, Houston Texans. And the last boy in the band? The Tennessee Titans. Yes the same Titans who were a Super Bowl runner up in 1999. #ImpressiveBack to back division championships is one helluva disaster.
Division champs in a division with the mighty Jacksonville Jaguars and their last winning season in 2008. Perennial playoff team, Houston Texans. And the last boy in the band? The Tennessee Titans. Yes the same Titans who were a Super Bowl runner up in 1999. #Impressive
A poor GM doesn't go 41-23 with two division titles and no losing seasons.
I agree Rick Smith needs to go as well.Great point -- everyone is a disaster except the Colts ... largely thanks to routine sweeps by the Colts.
So maybe that other Purdue-product GM needs to be fired now, too?
I don't remember a large number of people wanting him to become Purdue AD or, frankly, any. Not saying there were none but I don't remember it ever even being discussed, let alone "many". Maybe I'm forgetting.
Either you're trolling or too lazy to look beyond the record
This thread has nothing to do with Grigson coming back to Purdue in any capacity. It is all about complaining that Grigson is the Colts GM and they had a lousy, by previous standards, season. It is a typical Purdue fan bitch thread and nothing more.
You're letting the record cloud your view of his otherwise bas choices.
Bad roster management.
Bad drafting outside of luck.
Forcing Pep Hamilton on pagano
Forcing pagano to play certain players this year.
Either you're trolling or too lazy to look beyond the record
I select "C", all of the above.
Grigson has a history of making bad decisions. First the trade for Richardson, then drafting Werner with the first round pick and then this past season drafting a WR with the first round pick which they obviously didn't need.
Look beyond the record? Look beyond the record? Are you serious?
Either you're a fool or you're nuts or all of the above. What's your documentation?
The bottom line is always the bottom line.
But why draft a WR when they have bigger needs such as O-line and defense?
You are giving Grigson credit for what was put in place by polian.
Everyone thinks Grigson is bad (including national pundits) except you. You're right, everyone else is wrong.
Grigson booted 70 percent of Poilan's roster in his first year.