Can you make an argument that Frost was worse than Hazell?
Hazell: 9-33 (.214)
Frost: 16-31 (.340)
Numbers say Hazell and I’d assume total point differential would paint Hazell even worse, but Frost was well positioned at a strong program and just fell completely flat. They squandered winnable game after winnable game.
Not sure I can take the WOAT moniker away from Hazell, but damn was frost bad.
Hazell: 9-33 (.214)
Frost: 16-31 (.340)
Numbers say Hazell and I’d assume total point differential would paint Hazell even worse, but Frost was well positioned at a strong program and just fell completely flat. They squandered winnable game after winnable game.
Not sure I can take the WOAT moniker away from Hazell, but damn was frost bad.
