Like you I was swayed by the media three in a half years ago. Ten boys came forward and Sandusky was convicted on 45 of 48 counts. Because Joe was my hero, I delved into the case and it is NOW my conclusion that Sandusky did not have sex with any of them. The only case of eyewitness testimony was from a student coach who saw Sandusky with V2 and a janitor. Since then, it has been revealed that V2 wrote letters to the editor saying that nothing sexual happened that night that they were just snapping towels. More intriguing is that the Judge and the jury convicted Sandusky of a felony from Hearsay Testimony, which did not have a victim or a date when it happened (how does one defend that?). This is pretty convincing to me that the Judge and Jury were caught up in the hype that Sandusky was already guilty and not presumed innocent. However, recently it has been revealed that the janitor had given testimony that the man he saw was NOT Sandusky. For more facts, please go to framingpaterno.com. The big problem is IMO, there are people associated with the Board of Trustees who were taking political and monetary graft from Sandusky's charity and they don't want to even consider giving Sandusky a new trial for what it might reveal.