ADVERTISEMENT

Edwards at PG?

jwspiker

True Freshman
Aug 3, 2005
902
1
18
So if we somehow land Swanigan, I could see the following lineup, that IMO would be beast mode. Hammons, Swanigan, Davis, Edwards and then someone else, running the point/goard, where Davis/Edwards would be Point Forwards, both would need to improve their dribble and defense. We'd need to probably need to use Dakota/Bryson/Stephens/PJ in that other spot, but that would be a lot of height. We could use Edwards like hummel was with bringing up the ball frequently. I'm tired of see short PG's, really would like to see davis play SG, and edwards hammons and a true beast mode PF on the team on the court at the same time.
 
I think that's a helluva line up...the only thing you have to take into consideration is how well Stephens' is shooting the ball coming into the season (and mathias for that matter)...if Stephens can get to where he's shooting 40% from 3 you have to start him...in my opinion.
 
Well, i'd just need to see stephens/dakota develop as better ball handlers and whom ever can handle the defense/dribbles the best gets the start over the other.
 
I just want yogi or nic Moore while we're making a wish list. Then Swanigan with hammons staying.
 
I like the thought, but right now Vince's handles aren't good enough for him to be the primary ballhandler. Vince could be very good as a press breaker though. Hummel was used this way at times by Coach Painter and it was effective.
 
Originally posted by BBG:

Originally posted by jadeezra:
I just want yogi or nic Moore while we're making a wish list. Then Swanigan with hammons staying.
That is a Final Four team IMO with those pieces.
LMAO yeah, right, because Yogi would be a great addition to a team that needs to be unselfish and share the ball. Thank god Yogi will never wear gold and black.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT