Don't look now, study shows Obamacare succeeding so far

[Purdue85]

Originally posted by lbodel:
Ah yes, the radical left wing ideology like keeping Guantanamo open, being a supporter of drone strikes, adding troops in Afghanistan, lowered taxes (stimulus), propped up banks, supports the Senate immigration bill (bi-partisan bill), etc.

Very radical leftwing indeed.

... what?

You think "(propping) up banks is RIGHT wing?? And wanting to grant amnesty to illegal aliens is conservative??

And, who is opposing keeping open Guantanamo?

You're confused.

 

[BoilersRock]

Re: of course it is.

> No, genius... you're not defining it for ME. You can try to play dumb, but you won't get away from the point.

> Or, maybe it's not an act....??

Or maybe I'm just playing down to the level of the competition, Einstein.

Just respond with Yes they are conservative, or No, they are not conservative and I won't question or badger you anymore about it, I promise.





This post was edited on 8/8 8:14 AM by BoilersRock




Been a few days now. I guess the paint surrounding the corner in which you stand hasn't dried yet, LOL.


This post was edited on 8/25 8:30 AM by BoilersRock

 

[BBG]

Originally posted by Purdue85:

Originally posted by lbodel:
Ah yes, the radical left wing ideology like keeping Guantanamo open, being a supporter of drone strikes, adding troops in Afghanistan, lowered taxes (stimulus), propped up banks, supports the Senate immigration bill (bi-partisan bill), etc.

Very radical leftwing indeed.

... what?

You think "(propping) up banks is RIGHT wing?? And wanting to grant amnesty to illegal aliens is conservative??

And, who is opposing keeping open Guantanamo?

You're confused.

I try to avoid the political melee that goes on in this forum, but I have to say that his comment made me scratch my head. I suspect that he read that somewhere on a left-wing site and regurgitated it here.

I've had this idea for a long time that instead of being able to vote for a party, people instead would have to vote whether they were in favor of a idea or against it. No ambiguous political crap or mainstream media bias to go along with it, just yes or no ..then whichever candidate for President closely matched the majority, they would win.

I know that wouldn't work, nor would it really be practical but I would bet that the people voting would be SHOCKED to see what party they more closely align with.

 

[lbodel]

I never said it was right wing.

I said propping up banks is certainly not a radical left wing position.