Not to be an ass, times two, but the above empty challenge made me recall old news reports called “Why Johnny Can’t Read.” Or, in this case, won’t. The Cliff’s Notes version of this post’s purpose is simply stated in the heading.
Yes, in fact, attendance has been below Purdue’s all-time standard. My “rant,” or missed “offer,” is that fans like some GBI posters potentially help make attendance worse by echoing misleading talk of sellouts, instead of quickly checking with Purdue.
Remember the talk of a full house for Northwestern? Ten thousand short. And, Buckeye, what I heard during the wild Missouri game was from a fellow season ticket-holder who proudly informed me, “Ohio State is a sellout.” Really? Already? But rather than feed that grapevine, I looked it up with the true source.
Worst of all was on this forum: “Iowa Game closing in on Sellout.” Just a bit misleading? With thousands left? That same claim could be made after one ticket is sold. No lie, dude. Can’t believe NYC would tell such a Texas-sized tale. I gotta bridge for sale, maybe.
A good point from Chi-Boiler is that implying heavy demand can aid sales by generating a sense of urgency, driving some to quickly seal a deal. But that also can drive away some who think they don’t have a chance for decent seats or fans who feel satisfied with a projected full house and therefore don’t need to try and join the crowd. Most harmful, fans might jump to buy resales from outsiders while Purdue still has tickets to sell and money to be made.
But, geez, Bulldog, don’t just sit and “doubt.” And get a clue, 1987. In the time you took to post, you could’ve clicked the given link, clicked the game, clicked the section and zoomed in to see and count for yourself … 260 seats together in two solid blocks atop Section 101. Enough to unite some whole towns.
And we need singles hitters, too.
One giant leap closer:
https://ev9.evenue.net/cgi-bin/ncommerce3/SEGetEventInfo?ticketCode=GS:IBM:F18:F05:&linkID=purdue&RSRC=SIDEARM&RDAT=sgl