Originally posted by boiler_pride:
If OSU didn't turn the ball over 4 times (and 3 of them were unforced), the game last night could have been a huge blowout. From the second drive, it was obvious OSU was the bigger. more physical, and even faster team. Oregon's only chance was their gimmick to fool OSU long enough and hope OSU makes enough mistakes. That didn't happen.
As a Purdue fan, I was happy to see a B1G team win but I am scared this might mean Purdue won't win the B1G for a decade. With Meyer at OSU and Harbaugh at UM, the conference has two top tier coaches. There are only a handful of coaches at these guys' level. And these two schools can recruit the best athletes too. Even when they both have a slightly down year, Dantonio built a very solid program in EL and Wisconsin and Nebraska are always very tough at home and will always be competitive with the big dogs. Where do we fit in? It'll be hard for us, Minny, Iowa etc. to get into that group.
I also think OSU can repeat next year. That OL... If last night's game taught me anything, it's that you win football in the trenches. Yes, Elliott is a beast and Cardale ran over a few linebackers himself, but half the time Oregon knew what was coming and they just could not push those big guys back.
On a bright note, I feel like Hazell kind of has the right idea. One reason why OSU won with their 3rd string is they were built to run the ball first, and control the clock. Unlike the spread offenses' philosophy of attacking your 3rd/4th CBs and where you're thin, the power football attacks you where you're strongest and takes your spirit away. With Alabama first and now OSU's continuing success, I feel like we'll see more of these power offenses with big mobile QBs. I feel like Hazell is trying to build something similar.
Oh well time will tell.