Off topic but being a Purdue grad computer nerd, infinite loops make me think about things like NP hard problems. I'm hoping Purdue sports is not NP-anything.I think we have entered an infinite loop here so I will terminate. Peace.
Off topic but being a Purdue grad computer nerd, infinite loops make me think about things like NP hard problems. I'm hoping Purdue sports is not NP-anything.I think we have entered an infinite loop here so I will terminate. Peace.
You quoted my message, but I'm not sure what your point was??
The OP brought up the question of one and done and I gave my opinion. Agree, disagree I really don't care but you seem to have a problem with people discussing his status on this board and then you proceed to write 5 paragraphs about it. Am I missing something?
I said "before anybody jumps" and then proceeded to state that I felt Caleb is going to be a very good college player but I think he needs to play less minutes.Because you talked about people jumping on you because of what you said and then mentioned the NBA. Don't take things so personal.
Also a Purdue computer grad, the only thing worse than an infinite loop is a deadly embrace!Off topic but being a Purdue grad computer nerd, infinite loops make me think about things like NP hard problems. I'm hoping Purdue sports is not NP-anything.
1. Hammons - 12.6
2. Hill - 11.2
3. Edwards 10.1
4. Thompson 8.9
5. Haas 8.6
6. Davis 6.6
7. Mathias 6.4
8. Stephens 5.4
9. Swanigan 4.2
10. Cline 4.1
No. Considering our scoring margin, any player with a significant role on this team should be in the positive BPM.Does it surprise anyone else that the top 10 players for Purdue are above average? Is this like WAR in baseball? If so, I don't believe all 10 are above replacement player level.
Does it surprise anyone else that the top 10 players for Purdue are above average? Is this like WAR in baseball? If so, I don't believe all 10 are above replacement player level.