*Your probably right.... Today's society gives participation trophies to everyone. Kind of sad that people are satisfied with that.
*Your probably right.... Today's society gives participation trophies to everyone. Kind of sad that people are satisfied with that.
He had 6 months of coaching his team to learn how to break the press. If they haven't figured it out by now, then he's not a good coach. I don t know his personal, but I would probably put 2 pg. on the floor together. There are many things. you have to try something.This or That? Really? What adjustment would you suggest he should have done against the press? He was ahead. A team like Virginia, or Purdue, needs to get across halfcourt and set the offense. if you take quick, bad shots you're just playing into what the pressing team wants you to do.
Playing against the press is about execution on the floor. Period. The pressing team is down on the scoreboard and has nothing to lose.
Glad your satisfied.Time will tell, but as of right this moment we have 1 that is projected late 1st round maybe 2nd round (depending on which mock draft you look at). The other 2 (Haas, CS) are not listed on any mock drafts period. Our starting point guard might have started for Rutgers and Minnesota, besides those 2 he is a good sub for a few minutes to relieve a starter.
We had/have a good team not a great team. We finished about where we were predicted to both in conference and the country. Everyone was disappointed with the LR game and rightfully so, but the rest of the season played out about as predicted.
Lol at the "insanely talented" comment. We have fans that think our starting point guard shouldn't be in a major conference and you say we are insanely talented. I guess we will see how many of our "insanely talented" roster get drafted in the first round.
We have 3. Your fooling yourself if you don't think Haas and Swanigan aren't going to make it.Time will tell, but as of right this moment we have 1 that is projected late 1st round maybe 2nd round (depending on which mock draft you look at). The other 2 (Haas, CS) are not listed on any mock drafts period. Our starting point guard might have started for Rutgers and Minnesota, besides those 2 he is a good sub for a few minutes to relieve a starter.
We had/have a good team not a great team. We finished about where we were predicted to both in conference and the country. Everyone was disappointed with the LR game and rightfully so, but the rest of the season played out about as predicted.
Their offense was very, very good this season. Their defense is pack line, which technically is man to man, but heavily features zone principles and doesn't look anything like a traditional man to man. UVa is not supremely talented like UNC or Kansas. They have terrific guards, but they are mostly a team that is very well coached and gets the most out of its talent. Considering where the UVa program was when Bennett took over (not to mention WSU), Bennett is one of the most impressive coaches in the country, IMO.Never been impressed with Bennet. I've said that before on this board. I know Twin Degrees has said on here before that he liked Bennet and thought he was good. I disputed him then and stand by it. He seams to get his kids to overachieve, but plays a very similar style to what Purdue does. Tough man to man and not much offense, though I did think they made improvements on offense this year.
I think if you re-read my post you will see that the very first thing I said was "time will tell". There is no way you can be sure of anything other than what is reality right now. That reality is that AJ is late 1st/2nd round and Isaac and CS aren't listed anywhere.We have 3. Your fooling yourself if you don't think Haas and Swanigan aren't going to make it.
You really know very little about the game lol.He had 6 months of coaching his team to learn how to break the press. If they haven't figured it out by now, then he's not a good coach. I don t know his personal, but I would probably put 2 pg. on the floor together. There are many things. you have to try something.
Sorry Boy, you're wrong. All you have to do is explain to the team what kind of press the other team is gonna run. During the game, the defense will do exactly what you expect them to do. You just pass from A to B to C and get and easy layup. What's the problem?Wait a minute... I thought the press should never work? Isn't that one of the pronouncements we read on these boards? Syracuse used it quite often, so you would think Bennett would have prepared his team for it, right?
The problem is that no matter what adjustments you make, no matter how much you practice against a play, the real time execution of your players does not always equal and off-set the actions of the other team. We have seen it every year in this game of basketball. I just don't understand why some folks can't grasp the basics of this game. Bennett tried making adjustments and he called 2 TO's during the Syracuse run. None of made a difference in the end.
I am afraid that Syracuse's style and skill at pressing would have gotten to us as well. We don't have the players to match up well against them. Our front line would never had the chance to dominate theirs because the ball would have stopped midcourt. Ugh! We have some work to do.
Put me down as "Shocked!" Shocked!" that it was just that easy. It should have been obvious to me that it was so darned easy to break that press.Sorry Boy, you're wrong. All you have to do is explain to the team what kind of press the other team is gonna run. During the game, the defense will do exactly what you expect them to do. You just pass from A to B to C and get and easy layup. What's the problem?
When one coach doesn't know how to make adjustments this is what happens. I would have loved to seen CMP make some changes in all the games with huge leads we gave away this year. He didn't and UVA didn't either, same result.
"coaches need to make in game adjustments. You can't just play the same way all the time". Wow, I've thought that for years about CMP. That's the first time I've heard one of the analyst say it. CMP and GK are the same. They are/were hell bent to force their style of play every game, even if it doesn't work. You can't just say we're playing man to man and thats it. Press, zone and traps are all part of the game. If you don't know how to use them, you are putting your team at a huge disadvantage.
The second you start using Barkley as a source is the second you lose pretty much all credibility. Not that many though you and the others like you actually knew what you were talking about to begin with, but citing Barkley only cements that notion."coaches need to make in game adjustments. You can't just play the same way all the time". Wow, I've thought that for years about CMP. That's the first time I've heard one of the analyst say it. CMP and GK are the same. They are/were hell bent to force their style of play every game, even if it doesn't work. You can't just say we're playing man to man and thats it. Press, zone and traps are all part of the game. If you don't know how to use them, you are putting your team at a huge disadvantage.
Your right, that was bad coaching by all. I coached AAU ball for years. AAU ball is all tournament setting. The first thing you teach is breaking the press. Tournaments are 1 and done. Teams behind are disparate and are going to give you their best press and if you don't know how to break it, your going home. I saw so many fundamental mistakes by teams in bounding in to corners, stopping past 1/2 court, not running the baseline to get angles.... Those coaches all did a horrible job and are sitting home next week because of it.You really know very little about the game lol.
Breaking on press on paper or a dry board is easy. Kinda different in a NCAA tournament game, or any game for that matter. You see, the other team is actually trying to take the ball away.
So lets see......who are all the bad coaches in the tournament that haven't figured out how to break a press?
Bennett
Jacobson
Painter
Gard
Who am I missing?
And not one person here believes that. Your comments and your knowledge of basketball pretty much prove you've never done anything other than watch it on TV.I coached AAU ball for years.
YBoiler 35's comment about being "Insanely talented" made me laugh. Thanks 35. I needed a pick me up after watching these Elite 8 games and watching just how good these teams are. Maybe you should try watching some other team than Purdue. It might give you a better measuring stick to use when judging "insane talent".
one small clarification that I'm not sure gets noted. Syr pressed and Virginia "CHOSE" to attack the press...agreeing to speeding up the game. Virginia could have chosen not to do that, but thought that attacking it would work out for them..and it didn't. It is best if you can successfully attack a press, but not best if you cannot. All judgement calls depending on your team and who you are playing as well as that particular game. Still it took a player go off for the Cuse getting close to 30 the second half like Hagens from UALR did to beat Virginia.UVA played right into Cuses hands. Case sped them up and UVA sped up their offense which isn't their comfort zone. They let the game turn into a track meet. Great coaching by Boeheim.
Your right, that was bad coaching by all. I coached AAU ball for years. AAU ball is all tournament setting. The first thing you teach is breaking the press. Tournaments are 1 and done. Teams behind are disparate and are going to give you their best press and if you don't know how to break it, your going home. I saw so many fundamental mistakes by teams in bounding in to corners, stopping past 1/2 court, not running the baseline to get angles.... Those coaches all did a horrible job and are sitting home next week because of it.
Y
All I said is we had more talent than Cause does now. We have AJH who is projected a first rounder. Rapheal Davis DPOY. Vince Edwards all around good player. CS all freshmen rebounding machine. Isaac Haas was one of the most efffient backup players in the country. Dakota Mathias is a guy who could get minutes at almost any school in the country. If you didn't see outstanding talent on this roster you are blind. This team competed with nearly every team they played. The last five or ten minutes is usually what lost it for them. Which came down to coaching
alot has to do w/ player's execution, Bronson Koenig had no problem sinking a 22 footer as time expired , then in the next game, can't finish a layup and can't keep the ball close to himself when dribbling in crunch time.Not a peep about any point guard.
Pg play was a weakness all year, but not to the point that we shouldn't be able to beat LR. We did make their coach a rich man, he took the UNLV job this morning.Not a peep about any point guard.
I noticed that also.Not a peep about any point guard.
Regardless of this teams weakness, it all solely falls on the shoulder of one person, who is responsible for our roster makeup.I noticed that also.
Our point guard play or lack thereof, is the biggest weakness of this team and will be next year also if CE can't help out. PJ is a very good backup at this level. He is not a difference maker. That isn't saying he is a bad guy or bad for the team. What I am saying is that if PJ is our starting point guard next year and gets significant minutes we will have some of the same concerns/problems that we had this year. Take the 13 other teams in the conference and tell me which ones he would have started on this year?? His assist/turnover rate is what a lot of people get hung up on. That stat was good for him because he doesn't do anything to create. He passes the ball around the perimeter and shoots 3's. This team needs a point guard that can create and causes defenses to account for him at all times.
I don't think CMP would argue that with you.Regardless of this teams weakness, it all solely falls on the shoulder of one person, who is responsible for our roster makeup.
I wish life was as cut and dry as this #hottake.Regardless of this teams weakness, it all solely falls on the shoulder of one person, who is responsible for our roster makeup.
The second you start using Barkley as a source is the second you lose pretty much all credibility. Not that many though you and the others like you actually knew what you were talking about to begin with, but citing Barkley only cements that notion.
So if a press works, anywhere, anytime, the coach sucks. You said last week that a press should never work past the first time (one of my favorites BTW). He either doesn't know what to teach......like you do, or he doesn't know how to teach it.......like you do. The other variable is player execution which, inferring from all your statements, is a constant and easily done. There should be no errors, no lapses of judgement.......just execute what's drawn up. If a turnover is made then it has to be because the coach didn't teach it right, not because of anything the player(s) did on the court.Your right, that was bad coaching by all. I coached AAU ball for years. AAU ball is all tournament setting. The first thing you teach is breaking the press. Tournaments are 1 and done. Teams behind are disparate and are going to give you their best press and if you don't know how to break it, your going home. I saw so many fundamental mistakes by teams in bounding in to corners, stopping past 1/2 court, not running the baseline to get angles.... Those coaches all did a horrible job and are sitting home next week because of it.
Bobby Knight played man to man ALL the time.
Barkley never won a championship. Ever. He is an entertaining commentator, but I doubt that any programs are hiring him as a consultant to improve their chances of winning.
That lack of foot speed on offense is the same on defense. Purdue couldn't belly up as the did in the past due to rule change and foot speed to a degree. Breaking the press against Purdue might be easier than imagined. Hill was quick enough, PJ too short, the others not too fast, but AJ would be a rim protector and probably get a lot of chances to do that assuming he never got in foul trouble too quickly. Haas might not provide a lot of speed either...In the end, good coaches OPTIMIZE their team's chances of success and utilize all of the talent they have. We had depth, a shorter clock and a rim protector this year and should have used it to press teams. It would have also provided our guards with DAILY practices requiring them to break presses - I find it ironic.
It's also interesting to note that the teams doing well in the tournament have a lot of tools in the tool kit
It's time for us to change our style of play ! I hope we use Jacquil Taylor's and Carson Edward's 3 point shooting to pull bigs away from the rim and score more in transition, Vince's athletic talent to drive and go back door on teams, Vince's/Basil's quickness at the top of the key and at the top of a press to make more steals and yes, . . a zone to prevent the easy stuff.
It's finally time to tell our bigs to get the rebound out to Carson and PJ quickly and let's RUN ! (PUT VINCE & BASIL AT THE TOP OF THE KEY !) PLEASE ! (Think 1976 !)
"coaches need to make in game adjustments. You can't just play the same way all the time". Wow, I've thought that for years about CMP. That's the first time I've heard one of the analyst say it. CMP and GK are the same. They are/were hell bent to force their style of play every game, even if it doesn't work. You can't just say we're playing man to man and thats it. Press, zone and traps are all part of the game. If you don't know how to use them, you are putting your team at a huge disadvantage.