ADVERTISEMENT

B1G metrics ranks entering December

boilerzz

All-American
Jul 5, 2002
29,648
41,396
113
West Chester, OH
www.marchfirstbrewing.com
Bart Torvik without preseason bias:

9 Illinois
11 UCLA
16 OSU
17 Michigan
18 Maryland
19 Purdue
26 Oregon
27 PSU
36 Wisky
55 Nebraska
60 MSU
63 Iowa
67 IU
68 NW
76 Rutgers
102 Washington
134 Minnesota
148 USC


Big Ten KenPom ratings:

1. Purdue (14th nationally)
2. Illinois (15th nationally)
3. UCLA (17th nationally)
4. Ohio State (18th nationally)
5. Oregon (21st nationally)
6. Michigan (22nd nationally)
7. Wisconsin (29th nationally)
8. Maryland (34th nationally)
9. Michigan State (37th nationally)
10. Penn State (38th nationally)
11. Iowa (47th nationally)
12. Indiana (52nd nationally)
13. Nebraska (53rd nationally)
14. Northwestern (65th nationally)
15. Rutgers (70th nationally)
16. Washington (77th nationally)
17. Minnesota (102nd nationally)
18. USC (108th nationally)
 
Bart Torvik Wins above bubble ranks:

2 Oregon +2.6
9 Purdue +1.7
9 Wisconsin +1.7
39 Washington +.47
39 MSU +.47
39 Illinois +.47
44 Nebraska +.44
46 Michigan +.43
61 Maryland +.08
61 PSU +.08
63 Iowa +.02
64 OSU +.01
64 IU +.01
77 UCLA -.24
80 NW -.30
117 Rutgers -.90
146 USC -1.5
170 Minnesota -1.6
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerAndy
Bart Torvik without preseason bias:

9 Illinois
11 UCLA
16 OSU
17 Michigan
18 Maryland
19 Purdue
26 Oregon
27 PSU
36 Wisky
55 Nebraska
60 MSU
63 Iowa
67 IU
68 NW
76 Rutgers
102 Washington
134 Minnesota
148 USC


Big Ten KenPom ratings:

1. Purdue (14th nationally)
2. Illinois (15th nationally)
3. UCLA (17th nationally)
4. Ohio State (18th nationally)
5. Oregon (21st nationally)
6. Michigan (22nd nationally)
7. Wisconsin (29th nationally)
8. Maryland (34th nationally)
9. Michigan State (37th nationally)
10. Penn State (38th nationally)
11. Iowa (47th nationally)
12. Indiana (52nd nationally)
13. Nebraska (53rd nationally)
14. Northwestern (65th nationally)
15. Rutgers (70th nationally)
16. Washington (77th nationally)
17. Minnesota (102nd nationally)
18. USC (108th nationally)

Thanks great info. Always appreciate your posts that show this great info or game clips from X.

Illinois is good ...but with no clearcut great team like Purdue was last year, I imagine the teams that either have the favorable schedule OR improve the most from here on..... or maybe BOTH end up the regular league champ.

Besides Purdue, Dad likes IL, but then again liked PSU early on, and gushed about Whisky too...... hasn't committed to a champ yet.

Hard to say # of losses for the champ, but I guessing a bit higher than Purdue last year.
 
Thanks great info. Always appreciate your posts that show this great info or game clips from X.

Illinois is good ...but with no clearcut great team like Purdue was last year, I imagine the teams that either have the favorable schedule OR improve the most from here on..... or maybe BOTH end up the regular league champ.

Besides Purdue, Dad likes IL, but then again liked PSU early on, and gushed about Whisky too...... hasn't committed to a champ yet.

Hard to say # of losses for the champ, but I guessing a bit higher than Purdue last year.
Based on what I've seen, I'd go:

Illinois 14-6
Purdue 14-6
UCLA 13-7
Oregon 13-7
Michigan 12-8
Wisconsin 12-8

Ohio State could sneak into that group but I'm not sure I see anyone else doing it right now. Rutgers' freshmen are talented but they don't have enough around them to endure the gauntlet of the B1G. Maryland and MSU look solid but a step behind. No idea what to make of IU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Based on what I've seen, I'd go:

Illinois 14-6
Purdue 14-6
UCLA 13-7
Oregon 13-7
Michigan 12-8
Wisconsin 12-8

Ohio State could sneak into that group but I'm not sure I see anyone else doing it right now. Rutgers' freshmen are talented but they don't have enough around them to endure the gauntlet of the B1G. Maryland and MSU look solid but a step behind. No idea what to make of IU.
Probably as balanced a top half of the conference we've seen in a few years. You could make arguments for a lot of different teams to win.
 
Based on what I've seen, I'd go:

Illinois 14-6
Purdue 14-6
UCLA 13-7
Oregon 13-7
Michigan 12-8
Wisconsin 12-8

Ohio State could sneak into that group but I'm not sure I see anyone else doing it right now. Rutgers' freshmen are talented but they don't have enough around them to endure the gauntlet of the B1G. Maryland and MSU look solid but a step behind. No idea what to make of IU.
Why do you think Ill will share? I havent gotten a chance to watch them this year so curious as to why you think that. I have watched both Wisc and Oregon and they are impressive as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pboiler18
Illinois might have the most talented roster in the B1G and Underwood has proven to be a good coach, unlike the guy down south.
I don’t believe In Illinois to be able to win consistently in the conference as they will need to figure out how to play together still. They def are talented but I think they drop some head scratchers and finish 4-6th.
 
Thanks great info. Always appreciate your posts that show this great info or game clips from X.

Illinois is good ...but with no clearcut great team like Purdue was last year, I imagine the teams that either have the favorable schedule OR improve the most from here on..... or maybe BOTH end up the regular league champ.

Besides Purdue, Dad likes IL, but then again liked PSU early on, and gushed about Whisky too...... hasn't committed to a champ yet.

Hard to say # of losses for the champ, but I guessing a bit higher than Purdue last year.
Oh Daniel Jacobson. We are missing him more than I thought.
We need a rim protector.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
We are doing very good without him.
But I think with him and assuming progress made throughout the year, we would be hands down BIG favorites and IMO F4 contenders.
He did beat out Berg and Furst for the starting spot, as a true freshman.
However, Heide and Colvin may have not been able to break out with DJ in the lineup this year. Never know which way it could have gone. Obviously feel bad for DJ getting hurt that early, but it’s been great seeing those 2 flourish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Illinois might have the most talented roster in the B1G and Underwood has proven to be a good coach, unlike the guy down south.
According to Evan Myia CBB Analytics best rated top 5 players:
1. PennState 15.74
2. Purdue 14.62
3: Ohio St. 13.36
4. Iowa 12.34
5. Wisconsin 12.22
Illinois is rated 7th and IU with the best talent money can buy is at 9th.
 
According to Evan Myia CBB Analytics best rated top 5 players:
1. PennState 15.74
2. Purdue 14.62
3: Ohio St. 13.36
4. Iowa 12.34
5. Wisconsin 12.22
Illinois is rated 7th and IU with the best talent money can buy is at 9th.
PSU being #1 on that list should tell you all you need to know about the value of that metric this early in the season.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DwaynePurvis00
PSU being #1 on that list should tell you all you need to know about the value of that metric this early in the season.
PSU has a lot of talent and has added some nice bigs, they are veteran team kinda like Purdue, both teams have maintained their rosters and talent. They lost to a good Clemson team who is rated as good as Old Miss who gave us all we wanted on a neutral floor. Not surprised we are a dog (-2). We need to bring our A game to have a chance. You end up with good metrics if you perform. Look at IU and all that "TALENT", their metrics are 9th best in the BT, playing a weak schedule!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT