ADVERTISEMENT

And I thought Trump endorsed candidates were in trouble

  • Like
Reactions: Indy_Rider
SIBoiler2 said:
Sadly Walker is a great retired running back but poor candidate. Fortunately Warnocke is terrible for most Georgians.
Click to expand...
Why is Warnock “terrible for most Georgians”? Please give specific examples. “ Because he’s a democrat” or “he’s too woke” don’t cut it.

Walker is a terrible candidate because he’s clearly mentally unstable and physically assaulted his wife. I don’t even need to go beyond either of those reasons to disqualify him.

I would say Republicans can do better than Georgia, but Marjorie is just up the road and I don’t think we neeD to rehash all the ways she’s terrible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bethboilerfan and BNIBoiler
BSIT said:
Bob said yesterday Trump was a drag to his endorsed candidates yesterday
Click to expand...
I did not say that. This is your problem. You take liberties with what others post……even what you post. You kinda get in the ballpark of the topic and then drift to conclusions that fit your position.

Trump may be a drag to some of his endorsed candidates…….but my point is, he backed the WRONG candidates…….and he backed them because of their loyalty to him and the MAGA creed. The big lie, he’s a victim, dems are evil etc.

Walker, Mastriano, Oz, Vance, Lake. There’s many running for statehouses and the senate that will lose because they are totally committed to trumpism……..and the voters are not that far right. These are extreme candidates. Trump didn’t care about their policies when he chose them, he cared only that they bow to him.

In the house races, trumps endorsement was key for some candidates to win their nomination……. and will help them win the general election. His endorsement benefits them. But the level of candidate and importance placed on senate and statehouses is far different that those in the house. MTG can win a district in Georgia but no way she wins a state election.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Bethboilerfan and Crayfish57
BuilderBob6 said:
I did not say that. This is your problem. You take liberties with what others post……even what you post. You kinda get in the ballpark of the topic and then drift to conclusions that fit your position.

Trump may be a drag to some of his endorsed candidates…….but my point is, he backed the WRONG candidates…….and he backed them because of their loyalty to him and the MAGA creed. The big lie, he’s a victim, dems are evil etc.

Walker, Mastriano, Oz, Vance, Lake. There’s many running for statehouses and the senate that will lose because they are totally committed to trumpism……..and the voters are not that far right. These are extreme candidates. Trump didn’t care about their policies when he chose them, he cared only that they bow to him.

In the house races, trumps endorsement was key for some candidates to win their nomination……. and will help them win the general election. His endorsement benefits them. But the level of candidate and importance placed on senate and statehouses is far different that those in the house. MTG can win a district in Georgia but no way she wins a state election.
Click to expand...
Seems like you're the one who drifts off point. This is your exact quote and for context I have linked the entire thread:

"70% of republicans don't think Biden was legitimately elected. There are Trump backed candidates for Senate, House, statehouses, secretaries of state, and attorneys general who believe in Qanon and the big lie. Some have direct ties to the proud Boys and the Oathkeepers. Their campaign ads show them carrying guns and shooting voting machines or using them scaring off angry democrats in klan hoods. In Georgia a trump supported former football player who can't put together a coherent sentence and just quoted Pharaoh on his slave policy is polling at 44%.

Yet you claim there's nothing wrong with the party, everybody else just can't handle it.

Check the polls, if you believe them today. Trump is gonna cost the party again this election."

Talking about living rent free in someone’s head

The soul of our nation is at stake. Lol the desperation level is off the charts https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-give-prime-time-speech-soul-nation-voters-prepare-cast-midterm-b-rcna45358
purdue.forums.rivals.com purdue.forums.rivals.com
 
BSIT said:
Seems like you're the one who drifts off point. This is your exact quote and for context I have linked the entire thread:

"70% of republicans don't think Biden was legitimately elected. There are Trump backed candidates for Senate, House, statehouses, secretaries of state, and attorneys general who believe in Qanon and the big lie. Some have direct ties to the proud Boys and the Oathkeepers. Their campaign ads show them carrying guns and shooting voting machines or using them scaring off angry democrats in klan hoods. In Georgia a trump supported former football player who can't put together a coherent sentence and just quoted Pharaoh on his slave policy is polling at 44%.

Yet you claim there's nothing wrong with the party, everybody else just can't handle it.

Check the polls, if you believe them today. Trump is gonna cost the party again this election."

Talking about living rent free in someone’s head

The soul of our nation is at stake. Lol the desperation level is off the charts https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-give-prime-time-speech-soul-nation-voters-prepare-cast-midterm-b-rcna45358
purdue.forums.rivals.com purdue.forums.rivals.com
Click to expand...
So, I think the issue is the two of you are using slightly different meanings of the word "cost." In my reading, Bob suggested that Trump would "cost" the Republicans during the midterms in the sense that they will do worse than they might otherwise be expected to do given historical precedent. So, in the sense of "there will be a cost." BSIT seems to be interpreting "cost" as "resulting in a loss." As in, "the QB's interception cost his team the game."

If my interpretation of Bob's meaning is correct, I agree with him. Trump being involved in the midterms and endorsing poor candidates will likely result in the Republicans doing worse than we might expect in a midterm after the White House has changed parties. It certainly looks like Democrats will at least hold the senate, if not expand their majority, and Republicans will have a slimmer majority in the House than originally predicted. Democrats could also do better in governorships and other down-ballot races than we might have expected.

If BSIT's interpretation of the word "cost" is correct, than I agree with HIM, as well. Democrats are not likely to "win" the entirety of the midterms (defined here as holding majorities in both houses), so, in that sense, Trump will not have "cost" the Republicans the House, for instance.

So, it looks like you're both right! Kum-ba-yah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: threeeputtt, Bethboilerfan and BSIT
Droid12345 said:
So, I think the issue is the two of you are using slightly different meanings of the word "cost." In my reading, Bob suggested that Trump would "cost" the Republicans during the midterms in the sense that they will do worse than they might otherwise be expected to do given historical precedent. So, in the sense of "there will be a cost." BSIT seems to be interpreting "cost" as "resulting in a loss." As in, "the QB's interception cost his team the game."

If my interpretation of Bob's meaning is correct, I agree with him. Trump being involved in the midterms and endorsing poor candidates will likely result in the Republicans doing worse than we might expect in a midterm after the White House has changed parties. It certainly looks like Democrats will at least hold the senate, if not expand their majority, and Republicans will have a slimmer majority in the House than originally predicted. Democrats could also do better in governorships and other down-ballot races than we might have expected.

If BSIT's interpretation of the word "cost" is correct, than I agree with HIM, as well. Democrats are not likely to "win" the entirety of the midterms (defined here as holding majorities in both houses), so, in that sense, Trump will not have "cost" the Republicans the House, for instance.

So, it looks like you're both right! Kum-ba-yah.
Click to expand...
Thanks for mediating

Redirect Notice

images.app.goo.gl
 
D_r4VJtXsAA2yGE

Robinahood said:
His cognitive issues aren't nearly as bas as the Pedophile in the Whitehouse.
Click to expand...
Not to worry - he's no longer in the White House...
 
  • Like
Reactions: cosmickid, Bethboilerfan and charlespig
Droid12345 said:
So, I think the issue is the two of you are using slightly different meanings of the word "cost." In my reading, Bob suggested that Trump would "cost" the Republicans during the midterms in the sense that they will do worse than they might otherwise be expected to do given historical precedent. So, in the sense of "there will be a cost." BSIT seems to be interpreting "cost" as "resulting in a loss." As in, "the QB's interception cost his team the game."

If my interpretation of Bob's meaning is correct, I agree with him. Trump being involved in the midterms and endorsing poor candidates will likely result in the Republicans doing worse than we might expect in a midterm after the White House has changed parties. It certainly looks like Democrats will at least hold the senate, if not expand their majority, and Republicans will have a slimmer majority in the House than originally predicted. Democrats could also do better in governorships and other down-ballot races than we might have expected.

If BSIT's interpretation of the word "cost" is correct, than I agree with HIM, as well. Democrats are not likely to "win" the entirety of the midterms (defined here as holding majorities in both houses), so, in that sense, Trump will not have "cost" the Republicans the House, for instance.

So, it looks like you're both right! Kum-ba-yah.
Click to expand...
Best case scenario IMO. Split the houses and freeze the progressive left agenda for two years… then get two good candidates up for President and let’s roll.
 
Robinahood said:
You people are so brainwashed. Biden molested his own daughter. But I guess since he's not Trump it's ok.
Click to expand...

Well, if all those pictures and what he said about Ivanka didn't make you cringe, I guess you have a very low bar.

For me, I always say, if there are enough materials, go ahead and investigate Hunter Biden (I think there's one ongoing already). Go ahead and investigate Joe Biden. Be my guest. I have no sympathy for corrupt pedophilia politician. What I hate most is the hypocritical double standard. Trump had his lawyers certified that all docs have returned to the government but he still held them at MAL. Yet people keep giving him excuses. That disgusts me.

www.law.com

A Trump Lawyer Certified All Classified Documents Were Returned. Then the FBI Found More. | National Law Journal

A new DOJ filing said the discovery of additional documents at Mar-a-Largo casts doubt on the cooperation of Trump and his legal team.
www.law.com www.law.com
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Crayfish57 and Bethboilerfan
Herschel Walker is the most jacked up candidate I have ever saw running for public office. This man pulled a gun on his ex-wife. He lied about being a police officer. He lied about graduating from college. Then claims he was a valedictorian. Perhaps one of his personalities did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bethboilerfan
BNIBoiler said:
Herschel Walker is the most jacked up candidate I have ever saw running for public office. This man pulled a gun on his ex-wife. He lied about being a police officer. He lied about graduating from college. Then claims he was a valedictorian. Perhaps one of his personalities did.
Click to expand...
Now Herschel only has a couple hundred billion lies to go to catch Slow Joe
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robinahood, Crayfish57 and SKYDOG
BNIBoiler said:
Herschel Walker is the most jacked up candidate I have ever saw running for public office. This man pulled a gun on his ex-wife. He lied about being a police officer. He lied about graduating from college. Then claims he was a valedictorian. Perhaps one of his personalities did.
Click to expand...
I think as you do about Walker.
 
BNIBoiler said:
Herschel Walker is the most jacked up candidate I have ever saw running for public office. This man pulled a gun on his ex-wife. He lied about being a police officer. He lied about graduating from college. Then claims he was a valedictorian. Perhaps one of his personalities did.
Click to expand...
Has a lot of similarities to the current President.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AgainstDaWind
Bethboilerfan said:
Honestly, I do not think that Hershel Walker winning would be something for Trump or anyone else to celebrate. Walker appears to me to have serious cognitive problems based on his statements.
Click to expand...
I assume you voted for Biden. But question Walker. 🤪.

To steal the Biden playbook, I guess Walker better increase his staff/handlers, limit his public speaking engagements and get questions submitted before providing answers publically. At least Walker can get from point A to point B on his own. (Unless I missed something 🤷‍♂️)
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSIT, AgainstDaWind and Crayfish57
charlespig said:
“Is it wrong to be more sexually attracted to your own daughter than your wife?”

Yes, he said that.

forward.com

8 creepy things Donald Trump has said about Ivanka

A running list of the cringiest comments former president Donald Trump has made about his daughter Ivanka Trump
forward.com forward.com
Click to expand...
Please explain to us why Biden’s daughter Ashley has been to drug rehab at least once and in the diary she left at drug rehab alluded to the fact that Biden took showers with her when she was pre-pubescent girl. She alluded to him abusing her sexually. She’s stated she has a sex addiction as well as drug and alcohol issues. Did this not happen?

Hunter Biden has even more serious drug and alcohol addiction issues. He has routinely paid for prostitutes and went on week-long benders.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Robinahood, bonefish1, Crayfish57 and 1 other person
Robinahood said:
You people are so brainwashed. Biden molested his own daughter. But I guess since he's not Trump it's ok.
Click to expand...
Interesting in that I have not heard this, but was sent an email at 10:14 this morning from a previous military person. It says you can read the whole thing on National REview which is a conservative leaning paper, but not filled with Trump supporters and an account I don't have. It might show up on CNN, MSNBC or other media outlets once they finish with the Trump Russian connection, but won't hold my breath. Anyway, I didn't even know Joe had a daughter ;)

patriotpost.us

In Brief: The Case of Ashley Biden's Diary

The DOJ does not agree to guilty pleas and cooperation arrangements with clearly culpable offenders unless more attractive targets can be pursued.
patriotpost.us
 
SIBoiler2 said:
If a Cheney is on the ballot I will likely not vote.
Click to expand...
It’s a shame that republicans will not vote for true conservatives like Liz Cheney. A Pence/Cheney ticket sounds intriguing. If I was a conservative, I would be excited about that ticket. That ticket could restore dignity to the Republican Party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gr8indoorsman
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

tjreese

This can't be true or we would have heard about it on CNN, MSNBC, CBS and ABC or other media. Besides,

Replies
27
Views
6K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
tjreese
tjreese
Kyle_Holderfield

OFF TOPIC WEEKLY UPLOAD: Basketball Recruiting Updates, Football Recruiting Updates, & More [Discussion]

Replies
10
Views
2K
The Depot
hoosierdog1
H
Y

Officially confirmed by the NY Times: Democratic men are NancyBoys

Replies
26
Views
3K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
Crayfish57
Crayfish57
BlackGoldTexas

Best of the Best Basketball Message Boards (Selected Excerpts)

Replies
6
Views
3K
The Depot
greeneman
G
BlackGoldTexas

Michigan State Game Threads (Selected Excerpts)

Replies
80
Views
7K
The Depot
boilerbusdriver
boilerbusdriver
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back