Don't worry about it, you seem to not understand much of anything, we'll add this topic to the list.
Ah yes, the party of acceptance and inclusivity
- Thread starter Boilermaker03
- Start date
What do you have that RJG is an "insurrectionist"? Better yet, the other week 12 police officers were shot, Some died. Not a single mention by the administration. Very little mention on national media. What is it when somebody walks up behind a sworn officer of the law and shoots them in the back of the head? That this occurs so often a threat to democracy? Is this brazen and constant attack not an attack on our institutions?
Better yet, you read up on Betty Johnson yet? Here's her website: https://www.runbetsyrun.com/
Still waiting for an explanation on how a woman who is running specifically because the Oregon democrat machine (mentioning Kotec specifically) has destroyed Oregon is stealing votes from a Marxist progressive.
she isnt on the card that the precinct captain gave him as acceptable candidates.
You do seem very confused, no, a police office dying in the line of duty isn't an attack on democracy. You're comparing apples and oranges, the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
So now that you have heard of her and her background and how much she has invested in bettering the black communities of NWI are you gonna consider her? Or vote for Mrvan who hasnt done jack for Gary or Hammond.
I'll guess the latter despite the fact that it has been democrats who have ruled Hammond and Gary for years and oversaw the destruction of once great neighborhoods.
How about if Trump colluded with foreign nationals and created a false dossier on Biden and created fake financial transactions between the Biden family and foreign entities. Then although knowing these were falsified shopped it to the FBI to obtain FISA warrants to spy on a campaign and provide to news organization to push the narrative. And what if later Republicans in Congress utilized this falsified intelligence to draft articles of impeachment to unseat a duly elected president?
Is that a threat to democracy?
Green is from California, at the moment she works at Hyles Anderson College, a university that has its share of shady happenings. I get her mailings everyday, it’s apparent that she has big money behind her. I’m a retired tradesmen, work in Northwest Indiana has never been better, I can’t stay retired, our hall told us that we’ll be empty for 2-3 more years, Mrvan is a personal friend, he 100% has my vote. No doubt it’s a touch and go race, I don’t know who’s going to win this one although 538 website has Mrvan at a 86% chance.
I get Mrvan mailings several times a week. I voted for him the last time. I voted for Green this time. Looks like we cancel each other out.
so a political party attempting to:
1. unseat a duly elected president https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/438/text
2. based upon falsified intelligence https://oig.justice.gov/node/16547
3. and falsified financial transactions (Alpha Bank) https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1433511/download
4. paid for by the opposition party https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...emocrats-steele-dossier-settle-electoral-case
Is not a threat to democracy?
Imagine, we came close to overturning an election based upon a systemically falsified and manufactured intelligence. And many of the people in Congress knew these were lies but were ok with burning down the country to gain power. The worst part about is that as this Russian hoax advanced not a single person in the Clinton campaign came forward and said, "Hey America, we made it up." That should scare anyone regardless of who you support.
So I have given you multiple federal government documents which document this action. So i'll try again, do you the actions taken by the Clinton Campaign, members of the FBI, and members of Congress to alter an election outcome, and then unseat a duly elected President based upon manufactured and falsified intelligence (much from foreign nationals) constitute a threat to democracy?
If not, why?
@BNIBoiler Yeah sure he has. Tell me. Who's ignoring what? Am I ignoring evidence of racism, or are you guys ignoring evidence of non racism (by Trump).
FACTS
Not surprised Over 10 million has been spent by outside groups in IN 1 for and against both candidates.
Cook and Sabato Crystal Ball have it as a toss up. The lone poll was in mid May w/500 people and was Mrvan +7. At this time that poll is worthless.
That's a ridiculous response. Trump's own words and actions are used, not some MSNBC talking point.
And how many times were those words and actions taken WAY out of context to spin it 180 degrees from the true meaning? Very fine people on both sides ring a bell?
Right on cue. Apparently when a black man says facts, he's a black traitor.
Actually he's not a black traitor. According to Brandon you're not black if you don't vote Democrat. Therefore he may identify as black but he's really not black.
Huh? Can you imagine a white person calling a fellow white person they don’t agree with a white traitor? What a weird and race baiting label.
Pretty loose with the facts and a crock of shit.
What does that prove? Did they pay it? Did Steele provide proof of the allegations in the dossier? If the FBI was going after Trump why would they even ask for proof of the allegations? Wouldn’t they just take it as the truth and run with it?
They did take it as the truth and run with it.
Why did they ask Steele to authenticate it? Offer a million dollars?
They investigated legitimate concerns. A few got carried away and lost their jobs. You want to forget all the connections between the trump campaign and the Russians, how the Russians tried to help, how trump knew they were helping and reported it to no one. Selective memories.
I guess she supports the insurrection. You know where people are trying ot help other people less fortunate than themselves, an accomplished woman of color who now wants to continue her public dedication at a higher more visible level!
Here we go again on how Democrats use their power to remain in power.
www.washingtontimes.com
Lawmakers demand answers over leaked Air Force records of GOP House candidate
A Republican Air Force veteran making a strong bid to unseat an incumbent House Democrat in next month’s midterm elections says her political opponents leaked information to the press about her sexual assault while serving in Iraq, and now two GOP House members say they want more answers from...
www.washingtontimes.com
Try using your brain for just a minute and think about what possible reason that Mrvan's campaign would have for leaking something like that. There's been zero evidence whatsoever that Marvan's campaign had anything to do with it, other than Ruth-Green's claim that they did. It's in her best interest to use it as an attack.Here we go again on how Democrats use their power to remain in power.
Lawmakers demand answers over leaked Air Force records of GOP House candidate
A Republican Air Force veteran making a strong bid to unseat an incumbent House Democrat in next month’s midterm elections says her political opponents leaked information to the press about her sexual assault while serving in Iraq, and now two GOP House members say they want more answers from...
I have used my brain to know that I was supporting the wrong party. What is wrong is right and what is right is wrong currently. See if someday you can have an open mind and realize currently supporting the Democrats is wrong. Example after example is out there to show that it’s true if you can see past your nose.
I identify as black, some days. Like, if I'm applying for a UNCF scholie, then I'm black. If the govt ever decides to pay reparations, I'm black. But, since I vote Republican, I'm a black traitor (according to BNI).
Are you referring to when the Russians exposed some dirt on Hilary?
Nope. A black traitor is a black person that votes against affirmative action, John Lewis Civil Rights Bill, Affordable Care Act, etc.
Also, black traitors are the ones white says that the slaves wanted to be slaves, Harriet Tubman didn’t free the slaves but gave them to other whites people, abolish the 13th amendment. Black people were better off being slaves. On and on. Any black person that is in the Chump cult are black traitors.
A black conservative that is for small government, tax breaks for the rich, pro life etc are not black traitors.
I have no words for the ridiculousness of this kind of logic. Just WOW! It has been proven that Affirmative action has had negative effects, so to be against it doesn't mean they are hurting black people. Yes there are positives, but there are also negatives and to ignore that is stupid. What needs to happen is to weigh if there is more positive vs negative. The arguments I have heard makes the case that there is a large negative effect, thus why they believe it should be removed.
I have NEVER heard anyone say that black slaves wanted to be slaves. I have also never heard anyone talk about abolishing the 13th amendment. These are just idiotic statements.
I have heard arguments as to why being a slave benefited black people, but the fact that you can't understand the concept they are trying to get across says to me that you don't have the greatest comprehension skills. The point they are trying to make is that the descendants of those slaves are living in the greatest country (or at least one of the greatest) to have ever existed vs living in the 3rd world countries in which they would be living in right now.
Let me simplify this for you. 1st world is better than 3rd world. Do you understand now?
They are not trying to say that slavery itself was good. Not in any way shape or form, but you seem to be taking it as if that's what they are saying.
You buy into the tax breaks for the rich political scam like a good mental slave to the left.
Last edited:
No. However, prior to the ACA, a lot of blacks that never had company provided health care needed and always wanted some type of health care that was affordable. Most blacks wanted the ACA to be passed. The black traitors knowing full well that the ACA would and will benefit blacks.
So if it's good for 12% of the country but bad for 88% it's ok?
OR, maybe it's because they understand that the ACA hurt more people than it helped and they believe that there is a better way to get better care for everyone. Don't imagine that thought ever crossed your mind right? Oh noooooo, it has to be that they are black traitors. GTFOH with this dumb shit man!
Are you sure affirmative action has negative affects? Because of affirmative action you you have a black Supreme Court justice in Clarence Thomas. However, he later on turned his back on affirmative action. A world renown neurosurgeon in Dr. Ben Carson. White women have benefitted more from affirmative action more than any other group.
You say that you never heard of anybody saying slaves wanted to be slaves and abolish the 13th Amendment. Well you get out more. Yes both of those idiotic statements, as you put it, were said that fool, Kanye West. Other black traitors have said other idiotic crap about slavery.
This country wasn’t all that great after slavery either. During the 100 or years of Jim Crow laws, ask the family of poor Emmitt Till, a 14 year old boy from Chicago that was lynched, tortured to death by white men that were later acquitted of his murder. The movie just came in the theaters by the way. I recommend that all of you on this board should go and watch the movie. There are thousands of similar stories like his during that time.
The bottom line is that 99% of black conservatives are good folks. It’s that small minority that perpetuate white supremacy.
