Especially if it protects rivalries.
Especially if it protects rivalries.
Good it should be protected getting tired of just playing one time a year and playing there. On top of that haven't we played three times in a row at their place in football at least twice in a row
I don't think so.
Just 2013/2014 when the conference switched from leaders/legends to east/west divisions.
I'm a fan of the move but my only concern is that it likely means even more Big Ten games while students are on break. I want the Paint Crew there for every Big Ten game.
Right, it will be a home-and-home every year. Ditto Mich-Mich St and Illinois-NW, no others in B1G.The Purdue vs IU rivalry is protected starting next year.
We can only hope that filth of filth louisville is no longer in the picture but I'm not optomistic.Thought you guys might enjoy this - from Archie Miller's B1G media day Q&A. Looks like there's a nice level of mutual respect between Archie and CMP:
Q. Just to finally get that IU/Purdue rivalry protected, obviously it’s your first year with the program, but what that’s going to mean for you and the state going forward?
COACH MILLER: Very early on as I got the job, I don’t know if it was on the recruiting circuit right away, on our couple of weekends or Big Ten meetings when I first got there, Matt really came to me and talked to me about it. And I felt that he felt it was very, very important for Purdue and Indiana.
He also felt, more importantly, representing the Big Ten for as long as he has, it’s great for the Big Ten. As I got the chance to kind of figure it out myself and look at our administration and their feelings, it’s a great thing for the Big Ten. It’s a great thing for college basketball when you have two programs that have obviously had great traditions.
Matt is as well regarded in college basketball as any college basketball coach. And to get started to be on the forefront a couple times a year is unbelievable for the state but it’s great for college basketball and in particular it puts the Big Ten in a good light.
In a way, I'm hoping that Louisville sees the errors in its ways, decides to go the straight and narrow, and then commit to a long-term home-and-home with Purdue to help them rebuild.We can only hope that filth of filth louisville is no longer in the picture but I'm not optomistic.
In a way, I'm hoping that Louisville sees the errors in its ways, decides to go the straight and narrow, and then commit to a long-term home-and-home with Purdue to help them rebuild.
I can dream.
It has nothing to do with sympathy. I agree absolutely that they deserve the death penalty.If you are really a Boiler fan you can not be serious with your post. This is the sort of thing that deserves the Death Penalty. Then they should rebuild by themselves. Indiana did it and Purdue did it. Nobody but the particular fan bases care. There isn't any sympathy in sports. If this isn't what you mean, then restate your case.
It has nothing to do with sympathy. I agree absolutely that they deserve the death penalty.
Purdue fans (including me) have been asking for a home-and-home with one of the regional powers for decades. Louisville was always at the top of the list. If they clean up their act, which I clearly stated, I say get them on the schedule.
Edit: think I I see where the "sympathy" angle came from. When I wrote "help them rebuilt", I was thinking that the Louisville administration would see Purdue as a tough, clean program to schedule to "help them rebuild" their program. I wasn't thinking that Purdue should schedule them to "help them rebuild".