What is wrong with you?
Time to start keeping track of the violent MAGA threats
- Thread starter BuilderBob6
- Start date
What is wrong with you?
Antifa most certainly supports the democratic agenda. How can you say Antifa and Democrats don’t go together? Anytime the Democrats don’t like something and protest the good old Antifa mob shows up. They are part of the Damage agenda. Democrats against making America great everywhere!
Of course they condemned "violence," but they did not condemn the group committing the violence, blm. Right?
CNN's Facts First searchable database - CNN
Search CNN’s Facts First database for fact checks related to the U.S. economy, mail-in voting, coronavirus, police reform and more.www.cnn.com
Antifa is not going to miss a good protest. They cut up during the so called BLM riots. And they showed up in Charlottesville and confronted the white supremacists. Again, I said this in my other posts. They did not show up during the abortion protests after the supreme court shot down Roe vs Wade. How do they support the democratic agenda when they have offered no opinion one way or another for women rights, LGBQT stuff, rallies for democratic candidates. No opinion on civil rights. Their Motus Operandi is confrontation. Not discussing everyday issues. You don't see them on CNN or MSNBC etc. talking about democratic agenda. That's not what they do.
Antifa chant 'burn it down' at Supreme Court abortion ruling protest in DC
Antifa protesters gathered outside of the Supreme Court where they chanted "burn it down" Friday night after Roe v. Wade was overturned.
Antifa chant 'burn it down' at Supreme Court abortion ruling protest in DC
Antifa protesters gathered outside of the Supreme Court where they chanted "burn it down" Friday night after Roe v. Wade was overturned.www.foxnews.com
Antifa chant 'burn it down' at Supreme Court abortion ruling protest in DC
Antifa protesters gathered outside of the Supreme Court where they chanted "burn it down" Friday night after Roe v. Wade was overturned.
What? We have it on BNI's authority that these cats are not political. Why would they care about the USSC?
I still don’t think that they are the voting type.Antifa chant 'burn it down' at Supreme Court abortion ruling protest in DC
Antifa protesters gathered outside of the Supreme Court where they chanted "burn it down" Friday night after Roe v. Wade was overturned.
Keep digging! Biden did get 81 million plus votes from someone.
It's totally illogical to think they would not have the same relative voting % as the general public. Perhaps a little more.....perhaps a little less. But they vote.
Another demo of how you get a thought in your head......wrong or right it sticks like glue.....no getting it out, no matter how wrong.
Last edited:
Abortion, for one.
Defunding police, for two.
Increased suffering for black people in lawless Oakland neighborhoods, for three.
I would think that number three, at the very least, would infuriate you - but you don't seem the least bothered by it. Is this the first you have even heard of it, since urban radio and the regime media blacked it out, I am sure.
Black Families Rally With Police Against Crime In Oakland While Group Of White Antifa Thugs Harass Them | NewsRadio 740 KTRH | Michael Berry
Black Families Rally With Police Against Crime In Oakland While Group Of White Antifa Thugs Harass Them
I have never said any such thing of Kamala. I also do not recall reading it here. I don't agree with those that say those types of things either. However, from what I know of you, you are using this as an excuse. You'd call Trump that even if others weren't saying these things about Harris. So I call bullshit.
How? In what way? There is literally NO evidence of this whatsoever.
And they've been thrown out of his rallies too.
Because they are stupid. Stupid for their beliefs and stupid thinking that is what Trump wanted, because he clearly didn't based on his own words. He said that he wanted people to go to the capitol and peacefully protest to have their voices heard.
That tells me that the media and the left are up to their same old tricks. Projection. Push unto others that they are or have been guilty of. That's the Democrat M.O.
Are you fukking kidding me? This is one of the dumbest things you've written here. Now you're some sort of voice expert? This isn't an argument that can it be proven in any way nor does it have any basis in reality. This is nothing more but wishful thinking. Wishful thinking that you want it to be true so bad that you're willing to believe in nonsense. This is TDS straight up.
You have your facts wrong. He didn't cancel his disavowment, because he said the very fine people on both sides BEFORE he disavowed white supremacy. You do understand that there were normal people there protesting on both sides that didn't include BLM and the white supremacists right? Those were the people Trump was talking about. But your hatred of him can't get you to think straight. GET YOUR FUKKING HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS!
That one racist dude was David Duke. He's not just some joe shmoe. He's like the main guy.
The point of me bringing it up was to show you that it's a moronic reason to think someone is a white supremacist supporter (embracer, however you feel you need to call it). I can go out there and some white supremacist can say that they love what I stand for and wants me to run for office. Does that make me white supremacist? No. I can't control who likes my policies. All I can do is disavow that person. That's exactly what Trump did.
Stop being a stooge and free your mind man. You're drowning in the leftist propaganda machine.
These people aren't going to dress in their black block when going to a friendly event. So there's no way to know who they are. They only dress as Antifa when going to protest and assault people.
Well considering that the "anti fascists" are acting like and using fascist tactics then I'd say they are a lot worse than you think they are.
Oh yeah, I admit that I called him Chump way before folks on here called Kamala Harris cammytoe and a whore.
As far as the whites supremacist that voted for Biden in 2020 after voting for Chump on 2016 it was not David Duke, it was Richard Spencer. Speaking of Duke, he and others supported Chump both times.
Who cares who it was. That alone doesn't make Trump a WS supporter any more than Spencer supporting Biden makes him one. You're using false logic to come to a conclusion you want to have.
Chump is not just a white supremacist supporter. He is a white supremacist along with DeSantis and a whole lot of other republicans. Nothing new as the republicans have been so since the early 70s.
So Obummer was a racist against white people. That’s nothing new for the eight years people suffered during his time.
Here we go again. So how was Obama racist against white people? What white person did he discriminate against? What racial slur did he utter?
Really getting tired of the racist bull shit spouted out all the time. It’s highly, and I mean highly exaggerated.
You just posted again about your opinion that Trump is a white supremacist. Did you already forget?
Prevagen Products
Prevagen Outlet is a site owned and operated by the manufacturer of Prevagen.
prevagenoutlet.com
Nope.You just posted again about your opinion that Trump is a white supremacist. Did you already forget?
Prevagen Products
Prevagen Outlet is a site owned and operated by the manufacturer of Prevagen.
You are still ducking Trump's statement that white nationalists are "a small group of people that have very, very serious problems. "
You are also unable to find where Biden and Harris condemned the racist group BLM by name.
There are no woman's rights. There are people rights. Rights not listed belong to the states.
I'm not ducking. I've always said that collectively, in addition to the known white nationalist/supremacist groups, the republican party has upheld white supremacy since the late 60s/early 70s. Reagan never denounced Apartheid in South Africa in the 80s.
Have you noticed a trend in our exchanges? You say something that is flat-out inaccurate, I post something to prove it so, and you slink away to hide from it.
"The system of apartheid means deliberate, systematic, institutionalized racial discrimination denying the black majority their God-given rights,'' Mr. Reagan said in a national broadcast. ''America's view of apartheid is simple and straightforward: We believe it is wrong. We condemn it."
Have you noticed a trend in our exchanges? You say something that is flat-out inaccurate, I post something to prove it so, and you slink away to hide from it.
"The system of apartheid means deliberate, systematic, institutionalized racial discrimination denying the black majority their God-given rights,'' Mr. Reagan said in a national broadcast. ''America's view of apartheid is simple and straightforward: We believe it is wrong. We condemn it."
Wow, for a normal person that would be an embarrassment of such a total beat down. However, somehow in BNIs mind you just became a white supremacist. LOL
Last edited:
Or this:Have you noticed a trend in our exchanges? You say something that is flat-out inaccurate, I post something to prove it so, and you slink away to hide from it.
"The system of apartheid means deliberate, systematic, institutionalized racial discrimination denying the black majority their God-given rights,'' Mr. Reagan said in a national broadcast. ''America's view of apartheid is simple and straightforward: We believe it is wrong. We condemn it."
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
His foreign policy legacy includes an alliance with a racist government
www.salon.com
Or this:
House overrides Reagan apartheid veto, Sept. 29, 1986
In October, the Senate followed suit.
www.politico.com
Reagan also opposed the 1964 and 1865 Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts.
You have nothing to prove that. That's the problem. There's way more evidence to the contrary, but you ignore it because you have major TDS.
You said Reagan "never denounced apartheid". I post a NYT piece that says, "Reagan, in Reversal.." by which he did denounce apartheid. Rather than admit you were wrong, you post items talking about the US gov policy before the "reversal", as if the policy change never happened and he didn't condemn apartheid.Or this:
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
His foreign policy legacy includes an alliance with a racist government
Or this:
House overrides Reagan apartheid veto, Sept. 29, 1986
In October, the Senate followed suit.
Reagan also opposed the 1964 and 1865 Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts.
A real man admits when he is wrong. On numerous occasions, including this one, you have failed to do that, proving that you are not a real man in any sense of the word - which is even worse than not being a real Purdue grad.
No they haven't. Just because the Republicans don't talk about race constantly doesn't mean they are propping those groups up.
So he quotes Reagan and you post Salon articles...Or this:
Reagan's embrace of apartheid South Africa
His foreign policy legacy includes an alliance with a racist government
Or this:
House overrides Reagan apartheid veto, Sept. 29, 1986
In October, the Senate followed suit.
Reagan also opposed the 1964 and 1865 Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts.
Hey. You missed this one on your news feed. Hope it was an oversight and not bias. Remember “who is being threatened matters.”
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/ch...s-threatening-shoot-trump-his-son-2023-08-21/
If a repub, the first. If a dem, the second. Right, Ted?
Similar threads
