Lol. Yeah, Nunes is a real genius alright. And lmao that he sued a fake cow from Twitter. Then again, his fan club on here is about as smart as he is, so I see why they would like him
#Obamagate
- Thread starter Tommy's Army
- Start date
Lol. Yeah, Nunes is a real genius alright. And lmao that he sued a fake cow from Twitter. Then again, his fan club on here is about as smart as he is, so I see why they would like him
Trump was impeached and Solomon was used as part of the scheme. I’d say it’s relevant.
What is your news source that tells you what you want to think?
Russia intended to create chaos around the world "And yeah, in our very own elections."
Lie. You're going to use a Hannity lie to prove your point?
Here's the link to the article in the Washington Times that was shown at the beginning of the clip. Please copy and paste the portion where Nunes says anything about Russia possibly meddling in our elections.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/29/rep-devin-nunes-putin-bear-out-there/
Soooooo........he has compromising pictures of you?
I don't read anything at all that uses verbiage remotely similar to Burisma Biden, CNNLOL, shameless gang of far left propagandists, etc. Talk about Pravda.
it doesn't matter. he will just move the goalpost. he can never admit anything. this all was certainly not "by the book".
In the article it states Mueller said the interference campaign started in May 2014. It says nothing about Nunes saying it in 2014. As your other posts have said, Nunes warned of Russia's efforts to interfere here and around the world. Nothing about elections in this link or any of your others.
Nunes is trying to rewrite history and take credit for something he didn't say........as if a general warning about Russia in 2014 means the same thing as warning about interfering in our elections.
You're 0 for 3 on proof on this topic. I don't expect you to acknowledge Hannitys lie to bolster Nunes or all the shit Nunes says and does.
Portnoy....a known liberal and Trump hater. You know what I want to see....transcripts of what was said between Susan Rice and Slick on the tarmac.
I'm glad that it is en fuego, because it is definitely not in dispute.
Apparently the scandal is that the Obama Administration acted properly when dealing with a corrupt and compromised incoming administration. Every release makes the right wing hysterics look worse and worse.
Who knew a guy was corrupt for doing his job? Instead of falling (like so many of the vulnerable did) for the idea that an incoming administration were puppets for Putin, he’s decided to investigate an investigation that was a complete waste of time. It’ll also be interesting to see what Durham comes up with. Him and Barr are both adults in a room where there aren’t many.
Last edited:
As we knew all along, Judge Emmet Sullivan is a left wing hack. Just in case there were still doubters out there.
So was Sullivan a "left-wing hack" when Reagan appointed him and Bush initially promoted him? How about in 2009 when he threw out Ted Stevens's conviction based on prosecutorial misconduct.
Must not have been when Flynn's firebrand right-wing nut attorney Sidney Powell sent him a copy of her book in 2014...
"Michael Flynn's attorney and conservative commentator Sidney Powell sent Judge Emmet Sullivan a copy of her book in 2014, about a criminal case he handled where he obliterated the Justice Department's work. Writing to the judge she's called a hero, the Texas-based lawyer inscribed on the third page: "Judge Emmet Sullivan, to all those who seek, hallow, and do Justice. With the greatest respect and gratitude for your honorable service."
Five years later, Powell stood face-to-face with Sullivan in her first hearing representing Flynn, President Donald Trump's former national security adviser who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI days into the new administration. It was a short meet-and-greet type of hearing. Sullivan held up the book in his Washington, DC, courtroom, acknowledged he had read the complimentary parts about him, thanked her for sending it, and moved on. Powell left the courtroom glowing."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/13/politics/judge-emmet-sullivan-flynn-case/index.html
I'm gonna humbly submit that Judge Sullivan became the latest Trump cult villain when he sat in for Michael Flynn's plea session in Jan 2018, and openly expressed his contempt for both Flynn and the deal which allowed Flynn to plead guilty to the lesser charge of "lying to the FBI".
His more serious crime- being paid $500,000 by Turkey as part of a plot to basically kidnap a Turkish citizen who the Erdogan regime was desperate to get their hands on was basically ignored then and continues to (oddly enough) still be ignored by the right-wing press. But I submit this is the offense that Sullivan viewed as Flynn's most serious crime, and why he's reticent about letting Flynn just skate.
Mueller allowed Flynn to plead to the lesser charge, in exchange for Flynn's testimony regarding the involvement of his business partner's in the plot. Probably not a coincidence that Flynn's plea hearing was held 2 days after his business partners were indicted in a VA court. Judge Sullivan clearly though the deal was too lenient... He asked why Flynn wasn't being charged with Treason and said this to Flynn...
“All along, you were an unregistered agent of a foreign country while serving as the National Security Adviser to the President of the United States. That undermines everything this flag over here stands for,” Judge Sullivan told Mr. Flynn. “Arguably, you sold your country out.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/us/politics/emmet-sullivan-flynn-judge.htm
The only reason Sullivan didn't actually sentence Flynn at the time (Dec 2018) was that he felt Flynn's lawyers didn't understand that he (Sullivan) felt that the case required prison time. He felt they were underprepared and assumed that he would give him some
nominal sentence (lacking incarceration), which he (Judge Sullivan) did not intend to do...
Last edited:
If only your factual and rational post had any effect at all against the minds of truly disturbed individuals.
the minds of truly disturbed individuals.
Explain. How do we know know Sullivan was influenced by the opinion piece?
Isn't Gleeson just arguing the same position he took in the op Ed?
What does O'Neil being Yates' attorney and being in the same firm as Gleeson have to do with anything? Gleeson is arguing against the government position, these people can be as partisan as they want to be.
And BTW, Barr's decision to drop the case against Flynn under these conditions is unprecedented.
Oh, oh, atl in a panic scouring twitter for some kinda response
Similar threads
