I'm confused. Yesterday you said "The report should not contain any opinions of intent period. And it does, you need to read the report."
So you claim the report is a Mueller opinion piece and I need to read it..........but you haven't read it. Sounds like you're learning from Donald pretty well.
Who needs an informed electorate?
I'm done with your lame ass.
Not surprised you are easily confused.
I will some time today, check out the section that describes the Russians supplying wiki leaks with the HRC e-mails. I will make my own mind up as to whether there is enough evidence presented to reach that conclusion. Comey reported there was evidence of many foreign entities hacking into HRC's unsecure server so to pin the release on the Russians, IMO requires some proof.
I didn't read the report because the most of the same FBI agents conducted the two investigations. One on Trump and one on Clinton.
On committing a crime.
After a 2 1/2 MONTH investigation Comey comes out and exonerates HRC, after admitting there was extreme negligence in how she, as Secretary of State, handled classified e-mails.
It was determined that multiple foreign entities had hacked into her illegal electronic devices and had access to top secret information.
Persons are spending jail time for less.
Comey states that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute this case.
He doesn't even bring up the systematic destruction of the subpoenaed electronic devices by Clinton and her campaign.
Destroying Subpoenaed evidence is the definition of obstruction.
No mention of the Bernie Sanders situation.
Remember that as foreign governments are hacking into top secret U.S. information these same governments are donating millions to the Clinton foundation. Don't you think this would require investigating?
The MSM accepts this summary and doesn't request full disclosure of the report.
After a 2 1/2 YEAR investigation Bar summarizes the Comey/Mueller report accurately that there is no evidence of collusion by Trump or anyone is his campaign.
He also summarizes there is no proof of obstruction of the investigation.
Mueller and his gang of 13 interject, into the report, their opinions that although there was no collusion there was evidence of thoughts of collusion.
And although there was no evidence of obstruction there was ample evidence that Trump thought about obstruction and went do far as to order members of his cabinet to fire Mueller, a job which he could have done himself, and had every legal right to do.
He opinions in the report that although he didn't find enough evidence, after 2 1/2 years of investigation,to warrant prosecution the democratically controlled congress should continue he investigation.
These opinions give the MSM a field day to continue hindering the POTUS agenda.
I think it obvious the gang of 13 knew exactly what they were doing when they conducted both reports and how the information was presented.
And you wonder why I really don't give two hoots about what is in the report.
