You jump all over people for misreading your posts and you misread mine. I didn't say every. I said many. As you've said on your posts and people misreading, there is quite a difference in the words "every" and "many".
As Tweed said, Painter uses a very similar pitch. So why aren't we getting them? Well one can speculate there is some form of cheating involved in order for those players to go to that school they choose.
So my point of Nassar is this: how many times did someone bring up the abuse at MSU and they turn a blindeye to it? Win at all costs. How is that any different than cheating?
And to sum it all up, if Painters pitch is the same as others but they aren't choosing Purdue it seems like you would be ok with cheating in order to land top 50 recruits. Again not saying every top 50 is involved in some form of cheating but many are.
And if you're not ok with Painter cheating, cool. Then just simply tell us what he needs to do from your point of view to get what you think will make us viable in the final 4.