AAAAAAAANNNNND no it hasn't. Watch the video. Don't be a sheep. That article is lying and you can clearly see it in the video.Aaaaand it's already been debunked.
Fox News Reporter Debunks Georgia Election Fraud Claims Made on Network
"What appears is reported as suitcases are actually the normal containers that ballots are put in."www.newsweek.com
And we’ve reached the point of debunking the debunking of the debunking. BTW, you are always screaming for the media to investigate. This guy (local GA reporter), spent 2 hours with the GA Voting systems guy today doing just that.
So you're obviously not going to watch the video for yourself.... You can clearly see someone enter the room. Make an announcement, then everyone clear out accept the people in the back of the room (an area apparently that the "observers" couldn't even see). They sit there and do nothing until everyone is gone. Then they pull the boxes out (I don't care if they weren't suit cases, it's still odd that they had them under a table out of sight). There isn't supposed to be any counting without observers. Which obviously is something that happened incorrectly during that time frame.
I watched the summary of the videos both from multiple sides (MSM and OANN or NewsMax) ... and i think most (if not all) of it was explained by the explanations given. If there’s a time range in the video you posted you think most compelling, I’m happy to watch, but no i’m not watching a 45 minute video.
You should be able to skip the first 5 min or so, but if you want to get all of the info for yourself as well as the dialog disgussing it, you need to watch the 45 min. If you're not willing to do the work for yourself, then you don't really care to find out the truth for yourself. Makes it easy to make shit up for people unwilling to do the work.
1. You don't know what the announcement was.
leadstories.com
Just fyi ... this is what the GA Voting System manager said (and he’s a Republican)
1. Affadavits are great, and all, but if someone else says something different, then additional evidence is required to determine whose statement is accurate. Given the explanation that those who were there opening envelopes were dismissed, it is completely unremarkable that someone would come in, say something like, "ok, if you were opening envelopes, you're free to go," and then people would get up and leave. Once again, you know an announcement was made and some people left. That's it. Why do people keep holding up affidavits as some holy grail of evidence? Has no one ever lied under oath before? Has no one ever thought they heard something but it was actually something else (ahem...PA postal worker)? Has no one ever mis-remembered what they thought happened? And, by the way, eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
www.psychologicalscience.org
So is there video of them putting them in the boxes and then under the table?
I have not personally seen it (there are hours and hours of video and multiple different camera angles), however, the same GA Systems Guy (again, a republican working for a Republican SOS and Republican Gov .. who are all Trump supporters) said this ...
Wouldn’t it help clear all this up if they just released the footage that shows them putting the ballots in the boxes and under the table while everyone is present? I guess that’s where I’m skeptical. It seems like an easy fix if it truly is nothing. And maybe it truly is but the optics look bad right now, imho
I assume they had. The Trump person doing most of the speaking yesterday said they had hours and hours of video to review (and they had not done a thorough review yet).
Have these law enforcement officials made any statements about what they saw? It seems most of the debunking is coming from just a few people, this guy in particular is an left wing investigate journalist, and I’m still curious why the governor and Georgia legislature has debunked it. Or maybe they have today and I’ve missed it.
He is a journalist, but he’s quoting and working with a Republican official in Georgia.
Fair enough. I guess we will find out over the next few weeks and one of us will be eating crow
Yes I agree. The video is one piece of evidence that supports the affidavits.1. Affadavits are great, and all, but if someone else says something different, then additional evidence is required to determine whose statement is accurate. Given the explanation that those who were there opening envelopes were dismissed, it is completely unremarkable that someone would come in, say something like, "ok, if you were opening envelopes, you're free to go," and then people would get up and leave. Once again, you know an announcement was made and some people left. That's it. Why do people keep holding up affidavits as some holy grail of evidence? Has no one ever lied under oath before? Has no one ever thought they heard something but it was actually something else (ahem...PA postal worker)? Has no one ever mis-remembered what they thought happened? And, by the way, eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Myth: Eyewitness Testimony is the Best Kind of Evidence
Activities in this unit reveal how eyewitness testimony is subject to unconscious memory distortions and biases even among the most confident of witnesses.
2. What reason do I have NOT to believe it, given the explanation of election officials?
3. The suitcase/not a suitcase part of this was not at all the point. You said it was improper for ballots to be counted without observation. That is not true in GA. It probably should be, but it wasn't at the time.
So I read through this article carefully and noticed this quote.Aaaaand it's already been debunked.
Fox News Reporter Debunks Georgia Election Fraud Claims Made on Network
"What appears is reported as suitcases are actually the normal containers that ballots are put in."
What law was broken? There is no law that observers must be present to count. They choose to leave that's on them. It's really getting pathetic guys... 🤣
It's a law that if the observers want to be there, they are allowed to be.
It was done after the last election but before the primaries.
en.wikipedia.org
Well I can read. The PA constitution and the US constitution are pretty clear.So your legal opinion is the Georgia SC judges were wrong, despite the fact they were all appointed by republicans?
Ok, sure, I’m sure you know more about Georgia law than these guys do.
Supreme Court of Georgia (U.S. state) - Wikipedia
Well the PA Supreme Court and pretty much every other judge (and many appointed by Trump himself) seem to disagree with you.
I meant Ga not Pa but the US constitution also states only the state legislature can make state election protocol changes. The Ga constitution is pretty clear on how to make election protocol changes.
Pick any state you like ... every court and judge in the land seems to disagree you, but I’m sure you are more qualified to make that call (lol).
The US constitution has been tested several times in the Supreme Court and always viewed "legislature" as the entirety of the state governing body (not literally the legislature). Not sure why people keep repeating this.
Neither the Constitution nor the framers intended for the state legislatures to pick the electors.........or......you know.......that's how it would be. There would be no electoral college with designated electors casting the votes.
Like every US citizen should, I will accept Biden as POTUS once the electorates are certified.
What is the charge? States are independent of one another on how they carry out their elections.
Read my post, that's not at all what I said.
