I know I said I wasn't gonna post, but I can't let this slide. First of all, I'm not going to address your straw man about man creating fire. Literally no one is arguing that the CO2 released by prehistoric camp fires is at all comparable to the current amount of CO2 we release into the atmosphere.03 I hate to break the news to you but the science is on the side of the man made global warmer theorists.
It can't be a coincidence that around 17,000 years ago when the last ice age was coming to an end that man mastered fire. As he ate is cooked Wooley Mammoth meat over an open fire he watched the smoke and emissions enter the atmosphere. Little did he know he was making extinct his main food source.
Or could it be this:
The cycle of apsidal precession spans about 112,000 years. Apsidal precession changes the orientation of Earth's orbit relative to the elliptical plane. The combined effects of axial and apsidal precession result in an overall precession cycle spanning about 23,000 years on average.
And you're really going to use information from NASA's climate change page that speaks specifically about a long-term (ie. tens or hundreds of thousands of years) cycle of ice ages to explain the current, observed climate changes over the period of less than 200 years? From a page that literally includes a sidebar called "Why Milankovitch Cycles Can’t Explain Earth’s Current Warming?" You're using NASA to disprove climate change? Really? One of those government organizations that's lying to us about climate change debunks themselves on their own website that's meant to explain climate change to us? Dafuq? That's really just too funny. I guess I'm glad y'all are here to understand NASA's science better than NASA does.
Ok, now I'm really done.
Last edited: