ADVERTISEMENT

Another disgusting liberal hypocrite pig...

Weird that you think I GAF about Been Affleck.

Thoughts on the president and the 20 women?
Just another example of a disgusting liberal hypocrite. Comes out with a self-serving statement about his Daddy Weinstein (another liberal hypocrite, who Affleck had known was harrassing and raping women for years and done nothing) then has his own sexual assault and abuse issues come to light. Whoops!

Just fun to see all these liberal phonies get exposed, don’t ya think?
 
I believe the picture was taken in 2006. Franken became a senator in 2009.
Not sure about this one. He was a comedian trying to make a joke on an ex playboy model. I have more of a problem with the kissing episode......assuming there was no contact in the picture or after.
Here are Tweeden and Franken three years after the supposed groping incident. She looks petrified of Franken doesn’t she?

DPBuXB9VQAAWH07
 
Franken may not be perfect but Tweeden is no blushing 14 year old. Here she is with Robin Williams in 2004:

 
Ah yes, victim shaming. Well done, you. She must've wanted it back then, and is now coming out to gain notoriety, amiright?
oh come on...there's certainly a grey area here between victim shaming and burning the witches. do I get to sue my little league coach because he slapped me on the ass when I was a kid and now he's running for office?
 
Ah yes, victim shaming. Well done, you. She must've wanted it back then, and is now coming out to gain notoriety, amiright?
Let's face it, the "nuts and sluts" defense was invented by Bubba Clinton's posse. James Carville's infamous "Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find."

Some other classy quotations by Clinton's lead strategist of the 1992 presidential campaign:

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/James_Carville
 
I've seen a couple interviews she's done. Comes across as very credible, doesn't seem to go overboard. She says she forgives him, doesn't want him to resign.
That said, the only reason she's on the USO tour is she was in Playboy. A few sexual jokes at her expense by a comedian is not exactly breaking new ground. Obviously if he groped her in the picture that's way beyond the line, and the whole kissing thing is too.
The pictures and videos coming out now make me question if if she wants to have it both ways. But in the strictest sense, it shouldn't matter even if she was a pornstar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PUBV
oh come on...there's certainly a grey area here between victim shaming and burning the witches. do I get to sue my little league coach because he slapped me on the ass when I was a kid and now he's running for office?
One is unrelated to the other. What Bill did was pretty obviously trying to paint the victim like she brought it on herself or is somehow "cool with it."

And yeah, I don't think there's a statute of limitations on calling out sexual harassment or assault. And it's perfectly OK to change your mind about how you feel about something. Perspectives change. Women in the Navy used to be far more accepting of behaviors that are now viewed as harassment, and that's not their fault. They never should've been subjected to it in the first place.

You know how you prevent ending up in the news for this when you run for office? It's really easy. I'll let you see if you can figure it out.
 
One is unrelated to the other. What Bill did was pretty obviously trying to paint the victim like she brought it on herself or is somehow "cool with it."

And yeah, I don't think there's a statute of limitations on calling out sexual harassment or assault. And it's perfectly OK to change your mind about how you feel about something. Perspectives change. Women in the Navy used to be far more accepting of behaviors that are now viewed as harassment, and that's not their fault. They never should've been subjected to it in the first place.

You know how you prevent ending up in the news for this when you run for office? It's really easy. I'll let you see if you can figure it out.
You can think what you want but her outrage seems rather concocted to me. She is often on Hannity’s show and Roger Stone (the master of the dirty trick) announced that something was going to be breaking before it did. My guess is she spoke about it to Hannity and she then was strongly encouraged to come out with the story. In listening to her I think she is having deep misgivings about it now seeing the reality of what it is actually doing to Franken and she may have over dramatized it, my personal belief. I’m not sure who the victim is in this case since it has become a cause celeb among Republicans to demand he now be removed from office. Franken seems to be about the only politician that has ever thought about apologizing, whereas most merely just threaten and deny anything ever happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PUBV and TheCainer
We're talking about different degrees of womanizering (to coin a word). To rank them from trivial to felony:

1. Franken; a couple of gropes.
2.Trump; lots of pussy grabbing.
3. Moore; several sexual attacks and stalking juveniles.
4. Clinton; known rapist, serial pedophile, several sexual attacks and decades of infidelity.

This isn't a one-size-fits-all scenario. Clinton belongs in jail with his presidency vacated (no pension, etc). Moore and Trump will use the "nuts and sluts" defense conjured up by James Carville. Franken is a jerk and a creep but heck, Congress is full of those.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
You can think what you want but her outrage seems rather concocted to me. She is often on Hannity’s show and Roger Stone (the master of the dirty trick) announced that something was going to be breaking before it did. My guess is she spoke about it to Hannity and she then was strongly encouraged to come out with the story. In listening to her I think she is having deep misgivings about it now seeing the reality of what it is actually doing to Franken and she may have over dramatized it, my personal belief. I’m not sure who the victim is in this case since it has become a cause celeb among Republicans to demand he now be removed from office. Franken seems to be about the only politician that has ever thought about apologizing, whereas most merely just threaten and deny anything ever happened.
You don't really get to judge her outrage. Kinda my point.

Otherwise, I agree that Franken seems to be handling it better than most.
 
We're talking about different degrees of womanizering (to coin a word). To rank them from trivial to felony:

1. Franken; a couple of gropes.
2.Trump; lots of pussy grabbing.
3. Moore; several sexual attacks and stalking juveniles.
4. Clinton; known rapist, serial pedophile, several sexual attacks and decades of infidelity.

This isn't a one-size-fits-all scenario. Clinton belongs in jail with his presidency vacated (no pension, etc). Moore and Trump will use the "nuts and sluts" defense conjured up by James Carville. Franken is a jerk and a creep but heck, Congress is full of those.

Did Trump commit the crime or just brag about it?
Franken had a picture taken with his hands above a playboy models breasts, I'm jealous.
Moore, if what the young girl claims is true its pretty disgusting.
Slick Willy should be in jail.
 
You can think what you want but her outrage seems rather concocted to me. She is often on Hannity’s show and Roger Stone (the master of the dirty trick) announced that something was going to be breaking before it did. My guess is she spoke about it to Hannity and she then was strongly encouraged to come out with the story. In listening to her I think she is having deep misgivings about it now seeing the reality of what it is actually doing to Franken and she may have over dramatized it, my personal belief. I’m not sure who the victim is in this case since it has become a cause celeb among Republicans to demand he now be removed from office. Franken seems to be about the only politician that has ever thought about apologizing, whereas most merely just threaten and deny anything ever happened.
Always save my outrage at least a good 7 days when any political hot button issue arises. The more pictures surface of her and you read into her background and see how she acted on these USO tours, I think maybe she had other “motivators” to come forward now
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheCainer
Just another example of a disgusting liberal hypocrite. Comes out with a self-serving statement about his Daddy Weinstein (another liberal hypocrite, who Affleck had known was harrassing and raping women for years and done nothing) then has his own sexual assault and abuse issues come to light. Whoops!

Just fun to see all these liberal phonies get exposed, don’t ya think?
I like seeing the over the top, in your face Christian, holier than thou, anti gay legislators getting caught having, wait for it, gay sex.

This is a hypocrite. http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2017/11/ohio_legislator_wes_goodman_le.html

New Pal, would you call him a "disgusting conservative hypocrite"? Just curious where you stand on an issue like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuilderBob6
One is unrelated to the other. What Bill did was pretty obviously trying to paint the victim like she brought it on herself or is somehow "cool with it."

And yeah, I don't think there's a statute of limitations on calling out sexual harassment or assault. And it's perfectly OK to change your mind about how you feel about something. Perspectives change. Women in the Navy used to be far more accepting of behaviors that are now viewed as harassment, and that's not their fault. They never should've been subjected to it in the first place.

You know how you prevent ending up in the news for this when you run for office? It's really easy. I'll let you see if you can figure it out.
well you are out of your mind. I hope no girl you ever slept with decides to change her mind and call it rape.
 
I like seeing the over the top, in your face Christian, holier than thou, anti gay legislators getting caught having, wait for it, gay sex.

This is a hypocrite. http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2017/11/ohio_legislator_wes_goodman_le.html

New Pal, would you call him a "disgusting conservative hypocrite"? Just curious where you stand on an issue like this.
Another one.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...homa-state-senator-pleads-guilty-to-child-sex

It's laughable that either party act like antisocial behavior is restricted to one side or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bill4411
Another one.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...homa-state-senator-pleads-guilty-to-child-sex

It's laughable that either party act like antisocial behavior is restricted to one side or the other.
That’s the point: Democrats have been branding themselves as the party for women, of women, fighting the “War On Women” for as long as I can remember. Of course it was BS all along, since they were allied with Hall of Fame Abusers Clinton and Weinstein.

Now it’s even more hilarious as these liberal idiots like Franken, Affleck and Dunham make these grandiose, judgmental statements, then almost immediately get exposed as the gigantic hypocrites they have been all along.

It’s sort of like the Republicans claiming to be the party of fiscal responsibility. Equally ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG and TheBoris
That’s the point: Democrats have been branding themselves as the party for women, of women, fighting the “War On Women” for as long as I can remember. Of course it was BS all along, since they were allied with Hall of Fame Abusers Clinton and Weinstein.

Now it’s even more hilarious as these liberal idiots like Franken, Affleck and Dunham make these grandiose, judgmental statements, then almost immediately get exposed as the gigantic hypocrites they have been all along.

It’s sort of like the Republicans claiming to be the party of fiscal responsibility. Equally ridiculous.
Republicans claim to be the party of traditional family values, being gay is a choice, and living a "Christian" lifestyle. Governing through God. Apparently "sinning" in your office is allowed. I am not bagging on the guy for having a tryst with a guy, I am bagging on him for having sex with a guy AFTER he bashed it for YEARS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuilderBob6
That’s the point: Democrats have been branding themselves as the party for women, of women, fighting the “War On Women” for as long as I can remember. Of course it was BS all along, since they were allied with Hall of Fame Abusers Clinton and Weinstein.

Now it’s even more hilarious as these liberal idiots like Franken, Affleck and Dunham make these grandiose, judgmental statements, then almost immediately get exposed as the gigantic hypocrites they have been all along.
Are all conservatives in lock-step mentally with one another too? ALL liberals..geez. And who decides what position is liberal and what is conservative anyway? Steve Bannon? Bill Maher? This is just bury your head in the sand mentality with no thinking required by the person making those kind of statements.
 
That’s the point: Democrats have been branding themselves as the party for women, of women, fighting the “War On Women” for as long as I can remember. Of course it was BS all along, since they were allied with Hall of Fame Abusers Clinton and Weinstein.

Now it’s even more hilarious as these liberal idiots like Franken, Affleck and Dunham make these grandiose, judgmental statements, then almost immediately get exposed as the gigantic hypocrites they have been all along.

It’s sort of like the Republicans claiming to be the party of fiscal responsibility. Equally ridiculous.
Region and Bill nailed it. The right have been wrapping themselves in the Bible forever, acting holier than thou when it comes to family values. Yet it seems there are plenty that end up in scandals that exhibit behavior contrary to what he Bible says.

See what I did there? Threw all pubs into a neat little package and labeled them.

Just because a few liberals have been exposed doesn't mean the entire group has been full of shit. It's pathetic that you use the party's historical fight for women's rights as an argument against them. I guess it would be fair for me to say that since the dems are for the fair treatment of women, the pubs must be against it yes?
 
What really defies logic to me is why the black vote always goes Democratic. Geesh The party of Lincoln ended up Republican, the KKK has deep Democratic roots, even Nixon was a strong Civil Rights advocate.
 
What really defies logic to me is why the black vote always goes Democratic. Geesh The party of Lincoln ended up Republican, the KKK has deep Democratic roots, even Nixon was a strong Civil Rights advocate.
Because at some point, from 1976 to 1980 the states switched. Like now the southern states, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, etc. are conservative red, the northern states like Massachusetts and New York are blue.

By your logic, why would those deep south states be republican and support Lincoln?
 
Because at some point, from 1976 to 1980 the states switched. Like now the southern states, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, etc. are conservative red, the northern states like Massachusetts and New York are blue.

By your logic, why would those deep south states be republican and support Lincoln?

I don't understand why people can't figure this out. It's either willful ignorance or a lack of genuine curiosity. To think the parties are the same as they were 150 years ago is just silly.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT