ADVERTISEMENT

Wow, Stephen Smith borrows a thought from Aaron Neville to tell it like it is

tjreese

All-American
Gold Member
Sep 27, 2008
25,971
24,378
113
@Riveting since I didn't want you to miss this. In the midst of more truths coming out with many more yet to happen, this little gem is worth the couple of minutes listen. Still, as the mirage created by the dems fades, we are reminded there is a lot of damage to fix and some minds needing therapy. With the Christmas season upon us, now is the time to remember some unfortunate posters on the wrong side of history (which was known by many to be known by all) and hope their absence is not indicative of a lingering trauma.

 
First of all, Stephen A. Smith although not a black grifter will at times display rhetoric depending on which way the wind blows.

The FBI informants being at Jan 6 is old news. We discussed that here many times. What I see many folks doing is conflating FBI informants with actual FBI undercover agents. FBI informants like the ones involved in Jan 6 as well as on the streets of Chicago helping the FBI bust drug dealers are regular folks not employed by the FBI. The bottom line is that most of these FBI informants are shady characters on the ground helping the FBI in hopes of getting a reduced sentence or even some cash to help their cause. It's always been well documented that the leader of the Proud Boys that was present and involved in the Jan 6 mayhem was an FBI informant. Again, not an FBI agent.

So, if y'all are hoping that this will somehow lessen the sting or exonerate of the rest of 2,000 crazy MAGA Flavor Aiders jacking up the Capitol, you are mistaken. These FBI informants are crazy MAGA Flavor Aiders like the rest of them.

Absolutely nothing has changed. There were still 2000 crazy MAGA Flavor Aiders trying to stop VP Mike Pence from certifying the 2020 election.

 
Last edited:
@Riveting since I didn't want you to miss this. In the midst of more truths coming out with many more yet to happen, this little gem is worth the couple of minutes listen. Still, as the mirage created by the dems fades, we are reminded there is a lot of damage to fix and some minds needing therapy. With the Christmas season upon us, now is the time to remember some unfortunate posters on the wrong side of history (which was known by many to be known by all) and hope their absence is not indicative of a lingering trauma.

@BB62
@BNIBoiler
 
@Riveting since I didn't want you to miss this. In the midst of more truths coming out with many more yet to happen, this little gem is worth the couple of minutes listen. Still, as the mirage created by the dems fades, we are reminded there is a lot of damage to fix and some minds needing therapy. With the Christmas season upon us, now is the time to remember some unfortunate posters on the wrong side of history (which was known by many to be known by all) and hope their absence is not indicative of a lingering trauma.

Did you read the report or did you just believe what you're told.......by Stephen A no less!!!!! Aren't you the guy constantly raving about libs believing what the media tells them?
 
Did you read the report or did you just believe what you're told.......by Stephen A no less!!!!! Aren't you the guy constantly raving about libs believing what the media tells them?
Of course he didn't read the read the report. They just grab at the headlines and run with it. Informants are not FBI employees.
 
First of all, Stephen A. Smith although not a black grifter will at times display rhetoric depending on which way the wind blows.

The FBI informants being at Jan 6 is old news. We discussed that here many times. What I see many folks doing is conflating FBI informants with actual FBI undercover agents. FBI informants like the ones involved in Jan 6 as well as on the streets of Chicago helping the FBI bust drug dealers are regular folks not employed by the FBI. The bottom line is that most of these FBI informants are shady characters on the ground helping the FBI in hopes of getting a reduced sentence or even some cash to help their cause. It's always been well documented that the leader of the Proud Boys that was present and involved in the Jan 6 mayhem was an FBI informant. Again, not an FBI agent.

So, if y'all are hoping that this will somehow lessen the sting or exonerate of the rest of 2,000 crazy MAGA Flavor Aiders jacking up the Capitol, you are mistaken. These FBI informants are crazy MAGA Flavor Aiders like the rest of them.

Absolutely nothing has changed. There were still 2000 crazy MAGA Flavor Aiders trying to stop VP Mike Pence from certifying the 2020 election.

What has changed is MORE info held from the public about the FBI involvement...like all the video that was hidden. All of this in order to project a narrative that they wanted to public to gather. Still, knowing what we do...how does anyone believe anything the media states based upon their history?
 
What has changed is MORE info held from the public about the FBI involvement...like all the video that was hidden. All of this in order to project a narrative that they wanted to public to gather. Still, knowing what we do...how does anyone believe anything the media states based upon their history?
Exactly. What ELSE are they lying about or withholding from us?

The DOJ needs to be turned upside down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjreese
Of course he didn't read the read the report. They just grab at the headlines and run with it. Informants are not FBI employees.
Yeah wtf?

No, I'm not going to spend 5 minutes to find and read the IG report. Instead, I'm going to take the word of a damn sports TV personality about what it says.

What really happened is he saw a black man who is on TV a lot, who just has to be a liberal, take his side on a political argument. OMG, a perceived liberal black man agrees with me, it has to be true. Owning the libs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BNIBoiler
What has changed is MORE info held from the public about the FBI involvement...like all the video that was hidden. All of this in order to project a narrative that they wanted to public to gather. Still, knowing what we do...how does anyone believe anything the media states based upon their history?
 
Exactly. What ELSE are they lying about or withholding from us?

The DOJ needs to be turned upside down.
Yeah, Kash will get rid of the all the DEI and then spend 4 years trying to figure out how to run the FBI in between investigating trumps enemies and the 2020 election.
 
Did you read the report or did you just believe what you're told.......by Stephen A no less!!!!! Aren't you the guy constantly raving about libs believing what the media tells them?
ha ha. No I didn't read the 88 page report and the contents have nothing to do with this not being released until now and so what we have is due to the repubs gaining access to info things are starting to come out...ands more will as it goes forward. All this assuming the office of "justice" is one of the few not politicised as has been shown in recent history. That 88 page report was released days ago rather than years ago... ;)
 
Yeah wtf?

No, I'm not going to spend 5 minutes to find and read the IG report. Instead, I'm going to take the word of a damn sports TV personality about what it says.

What really happened is he saw a black man who is on TV a lot, who just has to be a liberal, take his side on a political argument. OMG, a perceived liberal black man agrees with me, it has to be true. Owning the libs.
you are so wrong on so many accounts. First Steve is not agreeing with me. In order to agree with me, I had to make a statement for him to respond...otherwise we just share a similar thought on a particular item. Steve is talking about teh "RECENT" documentation that drum roll please.....just came out...not years ago and would not have been known had Harris had the extra millions of votes outside the normal population of voters like Biden had. We know how this administration works. Whether a black man or some other silly mention of a demographic has nothing to do with the truth.

Now, perhaps we will learn a lot more things in the future without the narrative desired projected for the public as the recent history has shown.
 
Yeah, Kash will get rid of the all the DEI and then spend 4 years trying to figure out how to run the FBI in between investigating trumps enemies and the 2020 election.
like Trump spent time going after Hillary when he won in 2016 or different? What does history suggest? ;)
 
ha ha. No I didn't read the 88 page report and the contents have nothing to do with this not being released until now and so what we have is due to the repubs gaining access to info things are starting to come out...ands more will as it goes forward. All this assuming the office of "justice" is one of the few not politicised as has been shown in recent history. That 88 page report was released days ago rather than years ago... ;)
What access do the pubs have now they didn't have the last 4 years?

If you read the damn summary you would know why it's being released now.

"Consistent with OIG practice, in spring 2022 the OIG paused aspects of our review to ensure that the OIG’s investigative work did not conflict with or compromise any ongoing DOJ criminal investigations or prosecutions. Having been informed by federal prosecutors last year that our review would no longer potentially interfere with pending criminal prosecutions, we resumed our work on this matter."

Are you changing the subject now? The contents aren't important, just when it was released?
 
like Trump spent time going after Hillary when he won in 2016 or different? What does history suggest? ;)


He tried to. Sessions and Barr said there was nothing there. Trump also never said lock her up right?

He tried to sue her. You forget that? Didn't work out so well.

 
What access do the pubs have now they didn't have the last 4 years?

If you read the damn summary you would know why it's being released now.

"Consistent with OIG practice, in spring 2022 the OIG paused aspects of our review to ensure that the OIG’s investigative work did not conflict with or compromise any ongoing DOJ criminal investigations or prosecutions. Having been informed by federal prosecutors last year that our review would no longer potentially interfere with pending criminal prosecutions, we resumed our work on this matter."

Are you changing the subject now? The contents aren't important, just when it was released?
The contents "may" be important? Did the Russian Collusion teach us anything about trusting what we are told? Would this have been addressed had Trump not won? You lean to trusting what you are told concerning what is released now...I'm not as trusting. Was the "summary" accurate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting
He tried to. Sessions and Barr said there was nothing there. Trump also never said lock her up right?

He tried to sue her. You forget that? Didn't work out so well.

There was nothing there because they destroyed subpoenaed evidence.
That in itself is a crime. How many individuals could get off Hunter free after destroying evidence subpoenaed by the FBI?
 
He tried to. Sessions and Barr said there was nothing there. Trump also never said lock her up right?

He tried to sue her. You forget that? Didn't work out so well.

Did Trump or anyone go after her for the 30,000 emails destroyed? That says about all we need to know about the politics in play...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG and Riveting
There was nothing there because they destroyed subpoenaed evidence.
That in itself is a crime. How many individuals could get off Hunter free after destroying evidence subpoenaed by the FBI?
beat me. unfortunately I'm off here for a few...
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerJS
Yeah wtf?

No, I'm not going to spend 5 minutes to find and read the IG report. Instead, I'm going to take the word of a damn sports TV personality about what it says.

What really happened is he saw a black man who is on TV a lot, who just has to be a liberal, take his side on a political argument. OMG, a perceived liberal black man agrees with me, it has to be true. Owning the libs.
What tjreese did was right out of the Faux News playbook. Go and find the first negro that agrees with their stance and display them on the show or here in this forum.

As far as my man Stephen A. Sometimes it depends on which way the wind blows on some of the stances that he takes. So it’s hard to label him a liberal or right winger. Overall I think he slightly leans right. Very slight. But he is definitely not MAGA. He hates Chump. He goes on Hannity quite often. They disagree when they discuss Chump.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, Kash will get rid of the all the DEI and then spend 4 years trying to figure out how to run the FBI in between investigating trumps enemies and the 2020 election.
If the federal goons did nothing wrong, they should have nothing to worry about.

“Elections have consequences.” - Barack Obama
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bank Shot Podcast
@Riveting since I didn't want you to miss this. In the midst of more truths coming out with many more yet to happen, this little gem is worth the couple of minutes listen. Still, as the mirage created by the dems fades, we are reminded there is a lot of damage to fix and some minds needing therapy. With the Christmas season upon us, now is the time to remember some unfortunate posters on the wrong side of history (which was known by many to be known by all) and hope their absence is not indicative of a lingering trauma.
I commend you for thinking of them and wishing them well at this time of holiday spirit and good cheer.

Merry Christmas to you, TJ, and all forum dwellers - even those who wear clown pants.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjreese
If the federal goons did nothing wrong, they should have nothing to worry about.

“Elections have consequences.” - Barack Obama
I can't believe people still use this argument lol. I expect to see a lot more of it in the next 4 years.......especially since it's known that Goebbels is known to have used the phrase.

Were you using it the last 4 years when trump was being investigated? You think he would be fine with using that argument against him?

How about you? Why would you worry if the FBI was investigating you if they had no evidence and you had done nothing wrong?

Most idiotic argument ever......unless you live in Russia.
 
I can't believe people still use this argument lol. I expect to see a lot more of it in the next 4 years.......especially since it's known that Goebbels is known to have used the phrase.

Were you using it the last 4 years when trump was being investigated? You think he would be fine with using that argument against him?

How about you? Why would you worry if the FBI was investigating you if they had no evidence and you had done nothing wrong?

Most idiotic argument ever......unless you live in Russia.
Libs getting all principled after they lose. Where was this when Obama’s WH was having the IRS hassle conservative organizations?
 
Libs getting all principled after they lose. Where was this when Obama’s WH was having the IRS hassle conservative organizations?
If you're going to lump me in with dems and ask me to defend all their actions we can just shut it down now. This thread is becoming nothing but a whataboutism from MAGA.

Would trump agree that the investigations into him were justified if he had nothing to hide? Would you be ok with the government investigating you even though you had done nothing wrong? Those questions are actually on point, your point.
 
Because you're all about mindless labeling and want nothing to do with defending your position. Under the old ways of the Republican Party, I'm more conservative than you MAGA tools.

Care to take another shot at arguing your point or just want to keep playing games?
 
What tjreese did was right out of the Faux News playbook. Go and find the first negro that agrees with their stance and display them on the show or here in this forum.

As far as my man Stephen A. Sometimes it depends on which way the wind blows on some of the stances that he takes. So it’s hard to label him a liberal or right winger. Overall I think he slightly leans right. Very slight. But he is definitely not MAGA. He hates Chump. He goes on Hannity quite often. They disagree when they discuss Chump.
Interesting, I think he leans left, but it is probably because of what we consider the middle. What he said does not change as a result of color. It wouldn't matter if a Chinese, Mexican or white said what he did, it would be true. The last several years we have seen projection by the dems towards the repubs in what was actually taking place by the dems. What in the world does color have to do with anything said? Are we to assume contradictory to data that blacks are more knowledgeable about matters and a black then would carry more weight and so I waited for a black? Perhaps I should look for an Asian since they seem to always be at the top of any academic measure? What would a black person saying this add to anything?
 
I commend you for thinking of them and wishing them well at this time of holiday spirit and good cheer.

Merry Christmas to you, TJ, and all forum dwellers - even those who wear clown pants.
Merry Christmas to you, the other faithful, and even those that are gullible. Christmas reminds me of Christ and Christ reminds me of Rome and so in this season I find it interesting that when Nero set fire to Rome and blamed the Christians we too have experienced similar projection by the dems in what they actually did (and this goes beyond the summer of love). There is soooooooooo much we would never have learned had it not been for Trump. So in spite of those that voted to destroy the country...AGAIN...during this holy season I'm reminded of the famous words said 2000 years ago to other gullibles at the time which was Father forgive them for they do not know what they do.

I am a bit worried about that 95 guy that got on here and went to the basketball board to publically proclaim his superiority of knowledge in comparison to posters here to only to find out that he was wrong. I hope he is doing okay...
 
Interesting, I think he leans left, but it is probably because of what we consider the middle. What he said does not change as a result of color. It wouldn't matter if a Chinese, Mexican or white said what he did, it would be true. The last several years we have seen projection by the dems towards the repubs in what was actually taking place by the dems. What in the world does color have to do with anything said? Are we to assume contradictory to data that blacks are more knowledgeable about matters and a black then would carry more weight and so I waited for a black? Perhaps I should look for an Asian since they seem to always be at the top of any academic measure? What would a black person saying this add to anything?
You think Stephen A leans left. I think he leans a bit right. But that basically sums up what I said earlier. Stephen A says things according to the direction of the wind sometimes. He pisses off a lot of liberals so that is why I characterize him as being middle right. I think he is a Chump/MAGA hating conservative. Which is fine with me. I like his sportscasting and perhaps that is the lane he needs to stay in.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT