Question; why wasn't there a flagrant foul called on Dawson when he fouled Dakota on the three. After the foul he stumbled and stepped on Dakota's face. Being intentional has nothing to do with a flagrant foul call as I understand the rule.. And it wasn't even reviewed. And it should have been a seperate foul in addition to the original foul. THey did go back and review the foul on AJ after IZZO complained but not this one.