ADVERTISEMENT

Why no Flagrant on Dawson

KidsDoc

All-American
Gold Member
Aug 29, 2001
5,344
4,466
113
Question; why wasn't there a flagrant foul called on Dawson when he fouled Dakota on the three. After the foul he stumbled and stepped on Dakota's face. Being intentional has nothing to do with a flagrant foul call as I understand the rule.. And it wasn't even reviewed. And it should have been a seperate foul in addition to the original foul. THey did go back and review the foul on AJ after IZZO complained but not this one.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back