ADVERTISEMENT

Trumps Florida Home Raided by the FBI

You don’t know what documents Trump has.
He says the aren’t classified.
When it comes comes to aTrump his record with the FBI, and the MSM I’ll believe Trump.
Three big ones, Russia,Russia,Russia, the FBI is Spying on me, Ukraine, Hunter
lap top.
All were either fabricated stories by the media or lies started by the liberal controlled FBI.
Every President has kept documents.

Its very clear Trump gave up documents as requested.
It also clear all the documents in Trumps possession had been reviewed.

This is pure political theater just as the impeachment's and the Jan 6th investigation are.
This will carry on until the mid terms with no criminal charges and than disappear because there is nothing there.
Charges should happen quickly if there is anything recovered that warrant it.
This is how it happens. Uniformed, lack of critical thinking, complete partisanship. Wow.

"I'll believe Trump."

That's all you had to say.
 
This is….quite the stretch. How many times does this guy need to be in the spotlight, none of it for anything good, before you come to the realization that he just needs to go the hell away, for the good of EVERYONE?

There’s nothing to defend here. There’s no reason to contort yourself with pretzel logic like this for any politician. Not a one. They don’t care about you, dude. He does not care. Where there’s smoke, there’s fire, and instead of you just letting it play out, you drop every possible excuse you’ve been fed. It’s mind-boggling the control this guy has over a certain segment of the population.

The faster he goes away, regardless of how you feel about what he did politically, the better we all are. There are lots of threats against the FBI now. Every time something happens, it’s everyone else’s fault. At some point you have to think it’s just not worth it, right?

But in Trumps case, all the smoke is blown by democrats hellbent on trying to prosecute him for things that never happened (such as the Russia collusion hoax). So no, where there's smoke, there's not always fire, dems are hoping they can create some though.
 
You’re getting caught up in semantics but whatever. If Hillary was hiding shit at her house I’d want it searched too.

The fairness sentiment is your opinion. Sounds to me like he’s had plenty of chances to hand everything over and potentially didn’t. Thus, the search.
Why did Hillary destroy 30,000 emails?
 
Whoa, hold the phone there BNI. Are you saying ChrisTearsPforBaconFearsFishLoiusvilleBowlAtlFreedomKid has actually been banned from this lightly moderated site?!? When and for how long, like an hour? Seems like he lives here. I’d a figured one or both of the flakes, boneflake or crayflake, would have been axed first. Tears is a prime example of why parents should monitor their adolescent childrens computer time more carefully
Polly want a cracker?
 
Dude, being black I don't have many nice things to say about the FBI. However, in order to do a thorough investigation, why wouldn't the FBI check closets, and rooms, cubby holes no matter who they belongs to? If they don't check this stuff, in this case, the first lady's personal area, then they are not doing their job. Perhaps invoking favoritism because of who it is.

A couple of years ago, the FBI raided my next-door neighbor's crib. They came 12 cars deep with a huge evidence van. They were there for 6 hours. Believe me, they went through the wife's personal stuff.

why do you live next to drug dealers?
 
why do you live next to drug dealers?
They are a seemingly nice, quiet Asian family. Who knows what the feds were there for, drugs, cyber security, sex trafficking etc. It was quite the scene for sure. Only seen stuff like that in the movies. Nobody was arrested. The family to this day are going about their lives like nothing happened. Whatever the feds found must not have been enough to bring into custody.

The point is that I guarantee you, they did not tip toe around the wife’s belongings.
 
Last edited:
Dude, being black I don't have many nice things to say about the FBI. However, in order to do a thorough investigation, why wouldn't the FBI check closets, and rooms, cubby holes no matter who they belongs to? If they don't check this stuff, in this case, the first lady's personal area, then they are not doing their job. Perhaps invoking favoritism because of who it is.

A couple of years ago, the FBI raided my next-door neighbor's crib. They came 12 cars deep with a huge evidence van. They were there for 6 hours. Believe me, they went through the wife's personal stuff.
Funny how you like to use the term Crib so much.

This is how I picture you

images
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SKYDOG
You don’t know what documents Trump has.
He says the aren’t classified.
When it comes comes to aTrump his record with the FBI, and the MSM I’ll believe Trump.
Three big ones, Russia,Russia,Russia, the FBI is Spying on me, Ukraine, Hunter
lap top.
All were either fabricated stories by the media or lies started by the liberal controlled FBI.
Every President has kept documents.

Its very clear Trump gave up documents as requested.
It also clear all the documents in Trumps possession had been reviewed.

This is pure political theater just as the impeachment's and the Jan 6th investigation are.
This will carry on until the mid terms with no criminal charges and than disappear because there is nothing there.
Charges should happen quickly if there is anything recovered that warrant it.
Exactly 100%! At least we wont have to stay in, wear masks and possibly get sick over this Democrat plan to influence elections. Not a doubt in my mind regardless of what they find the timing was all about the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
I’m sorry, but wasn’t this already investigated? Look, I know whataboutism is all you have at the moment. But Hillary! Fine, hang onto that.

In the meantime, we can let this play out and see what comes of it.
I'm more than happy to see what comes of it. Something tells me Trump has outsmarted his democrat witch hunters again though. The guy, while sometimes difficult to like, is smart, calculated and probably takes all things into consideration with contingency plans.
Do you really believe Trump would make the mistake of taking classified, top secret documents and trying to hide them at his home?
I think what this will boil down to is that he has some docs that weren't turned over as quickly as they would have liked, perhaps some that were declassified, and that's what the debate will turn into. What was classified/declassified.
There's no nuke codes or military secrets. Trump is too smart for that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TMan92
I'm more than happy to see what comes of it. Something tells me Trump has outsmarted his democrat witch hunters again though. The guy, while sometimes difficult to like, is smart, calculated and probably takes all things into consideration with contingency plans.
Do you really believe Trump would make the mistake of taking classified, top secret documents and trying to hide them at his home?
I think what this will boil down to is that he has some docs that weren't turned over as quickly as they would have liked, perhaps some that were declassified, and that's what the debate will turn into. What was classified/declassified.
There's no nuke codes or military secrets. Trump is too smart for that.
He's smart in some ways, ultra dumb in others. We can agree to disagree here of course.

If he kept the docs, it was on purpose and because he thought he could do whatever he wanted. That doesn't make him stupid or smart; it makes him an idiot and a potential national security risk.
 
He's smart in some ways, ultra dumb in others. We can agree to disagree here of course.

If he kept the docs, it was on purpose and because he thought he could do whatever he wanted. That doesn't make him stupid or smart; it makes him an idiot and a potential national security risk.
If he kept any documents (again, do you really think he kept anything super secret, that he'd get himself in a lot of trouble for?), I'm sure his army of lawyers thoroughly vetted the legal process for him doing so. It's not like he just went to the file cabinet in the Oval office and said "Hmmm....this is interesting, I think I'll keep this. And this one....and this one..."
That's what made Trump such a great POTUS: he's a businessman. He analyzes the options, calculates the outcomes, determines best case scenarios, looks at the P&L of his decisions. etc.
I think this turns out to again be a big nothing burger. But....the dems will keep trying.
 
If he kept any documents (again, do you really think he kept anything super secret, that he'd get himself in a lot of trouble for?), I'm sure his army of lawyers thoroughly vetted the legal process for him doing so. It's not like he just went to the file cabinet in the Oval office and said "Hmmm....this is interesting, I think I'll keep this. And this one....and this one..."
That's what made Trump such a great POTUS: he's a businessman. He analyzes the options, calculates the outcomes, determines best case scenarios, looks at the P&L of his decisions. etc.
I think this turns out to again be a big nothing burger. But....the dems will keep trying.
Lawyers like who, Giuliani? Let's face it, he didn't surround himself by the 'best people'. If his 'army of lawyers thoroughly vetted the legal process', then one could surmise last Monday wouldn't have happened, no? Like I said, I'll withhold further speculation until we find out what they found, but the nothing burger comments are hollow when none of us knows what was found yet.
 
Lawyers like who, Giuliani? Let's face it, he didn't surround himself by the 'best people'. If his 'army of lawyers thoroughly vetted the legal process', then one could surmise last Monday wouldn't have happened, no? Like I said, I'll withhold further speculation until we find out what they found, but the nothing burger comments are hollow when none of us knows what was found yet.
I bet you believed, with 100% certainly, that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia on the election because that's what Schiff and Pelosi said? Am I right?
You believed it right up until the point where it was proven to be false.
So, despite the dems best efforts and huge circus, they couldn't find anything.
I think this turns out similar. Trump outsmarting them again.
 
I bet you believed, with 100% certainly, that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia on the election because that's what Schiff and Pelosi said? Am I right?
You believed it right up until the point where it was proven to be false.
So, despite the dems best efforts and huge circus, they couldn't find anything.
I think this turns out similar. Trump outsmarting them again.
Are you at all capable of not going right to the whataboutism well? No one else is talking about Russia but you. All I’ve said is let this play out but for some reason you have to play defense and try to divert. Certainly there’s a different page in your playbook you can go to here.
 
If he kept any documents (again, do you really think he kept anything super secret, that he'd get himself in a lot of trouble for?), I'm sure his army of lawyers thoroughly vetted the legal process for him doing so. It's not like he just went to the file cabinet in the Oval office and said "Hmmm....this is interesting, I think I'll keep this. And this one....and this one..."
That's what made Trump such a great POTUS: he's a businessman. He analyzes the options, calculates the outcomes, determines best case scenarios, looks at the P&L of his decisions. etc.
I think this turns out to again be a big nothing burger. But....the dems will keep trying.
Depends upon which set of lawyers Chump listened to. If it is the White House lawyers, maybe he did things on the up and up. However, if he listened to ne'er do wells like Guiliani and others, then it is highly possible that top secret documents may have been taken to the Florida home.

As far as a businessman. Looks like you were conned like a lot of folks. He was a horrible businessman. His casinos went to crap. Files for bankruptcy 5 or 6 times. No US banks in their right minds were willing to loan him money. That is why he had to go to Russia to get loans. Trump University was crap. Nobody learned anything from that institution. That degree is not worth the paper it's printed on. Poor decisions took down the USFL. On and on and on.
 
Lol, no what I'm upset about is the absurd number of people who:
  • Felt a former president should be above having a legal search performed at their home
  • Felt that the DOJ was being shady by not releasing the warrant
  • Have now shifted to either the FBI planting evidence or all of the documents were already declassified or it was "only" one box or Obama had documents shipped to Chicago
I could go on but I hope you get the point. This process is playing out as it should and I'm being more moderate about it than all of you by saying IF he's guilty he should be punished. Alternatively, many of you are just saying this is wrong and there's no evidence and it's a witch hunt because it's what he says. Pathological liar says what? If you disagree with that then we truly have nothing else to discuss here. Have a good night.
Pretty clear you don't get point (likewise for @gr8indoorsman , @BuilderBob6 , etc).

Maybe this liberal law professor can help you get the point:

 
Pretty clear you don't get point (likewise for @gr8indoorsman , @BuilderBob6 , etc).

Maybe this liberal law professor can help you get the point:

First, I didn't say anything about Hillary in that post, so I'm not sure why you are sharing this in response to me.

Second, you seem to enjoy linking opinion pieces to defend your stances (from Dershowitz no less lol). That's not really the amazing retort you think it is, but I doubt my telling you that will change anything.
 
First, I didn't say anything about Hillary in that post, so I'm not sure why you are sharing this in response to me.

Second, you seem to enjoy linking opinion pieces to defend your stances (from Dershowitz no less lol). That's not really the amazing retort you think it is, but I doubt my telling you that will change anything.
No it won't, but maybe if you could back up your contention it would.

Are you saying that Equal Protection Under the Laws in not an issue re the FBI raid on Trump?
 
No it won't, but maybe if you could back up your contention it would.

Are you saying that Equal Protection Under the Laws in not an issue re the FBI raid on Trump?
What contention exactly? I'm not interested in getting into a "whatabout" conversation with you. Hillary was investigated. Now Trump is being investigated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: charlespig
Are you at all capable of not going right to the whataboutism well? No one else is talking about Russia but you. All I’ve said is let this play out but for some reason you have to play defense and try to divert. Certainly there’s a different page in your playbook you can go to here.
No. The point is, that the dems have been trying to pin something on Trump for 6 years now, and nothing has stuck. CNN and MSNBC serve it up as truth and you libs/lefties lap it up. You believe it.
So, the point I was making was that you believed the Russian collusion hoax because you were told to (until is was proven to be false). And now, you're being told to believe that Trump is hiding secret classified military documents at his personal residence, which is also likely to be proven false.
So, that's how the Russia hoax and the raid on MAL are tied together.
 
Depends upon which set of lawyers Chump listened to. If it is the White House lawyers, maybe he did things on the up and up. However, if he listened to ne'er do wells like Guiliani and others, then it is highly possible that top secret documents may have been taken to the Florida home.

As far as a businessman. Looks like you were conned like a lot of folks. He was a horrible businessman. His casinos went to crap. Files for bankruptcy 5 or 6 times. No US banks in their right minds were willing to loan him money. That is why he had to go to Russia to get loans. Trump University was crap. Nobody learned anything from that institution. That degree is not worth the paper it's printed on. Poor decisions took down the USFL. On and on and on.
You don't think that the lowest level lawyer on Trumps team still isn't acutely aware of what he can/can't get away with and would advise him of those options and consequences? I mean, I know you only listen to the morons on MSNBC but stil.....

And as far as Trump being a bad businessman, he's the worst billionaire I know of.
 
No. The point is, that the dems have been trying to pin something on Trump for 6 years now, and nothing has stuck. CNN and MSNBC serve it up as truth and you libs/lefties lap it up. You believe it.
So, the point I was making was that you believed the Russian collusion hoax because you were told to (until is was proven to be false). And now, you're being told to believe that Trump is hiding secret classified military documents at his personal residence, which is also likely to be proven false.
So, that's how the Russia hoax and the raid on MAL are tied together.
Aside from you making a bunch of shit up here, you're totally right, bone. Just a bunch of random assumptions from you that you undoubtedly picked up from someone like Charlie Kirk. Your false idol worship is duly noted. You keep going back to Russia but I never talk about it. You do.

All I've said this entire time is let it play out and all you can do is pull out nonsensical talking points as some kind of response.
 
Aside from you making a bunch of shit up here, you're totally right, bone. Just a bunch of random assumptions from you that you undoubtedly picked up from someone like Charlie Kirk. Your false idol worship is duly noted. You keep going back to Russia but I never talk about it. You do.

All I've said this entire time is let it play out and all you can do is pull out nonsensical talking points as some kind of response.
OK, you say let it play out, I agree.

Do you think Trump is holding top secret classified documents at his personal residence?

I think they'll find some documents and the fight will be over whether they were classified/declassified, whether Trump had the right to possess them. But, they won't find anything related to nuke launch codes, military secrets, etc. (like the dems are hoping and praying for).

But, what do you think they'll find?
 
OK, you say let it play out, I agree.

Do you think Trump is holding top secret classified documents at his personal residence?

I think they'll find some documents and the fight will be over whether they were classified/declassified, whether Trump had the right to possess them. But, they won't find anything related to nuke launch codes, military secrets, etc. (like the dems are hoping and praying for).

But, what do you think they'll find?
I don't know, bone; thus the whole 'let it play out' stance I've repeated ad nauseum with you. I hope it's not things like nuke codes, etc. (sorry that I'm not 'hoping and praying' for this 🙄 ) I mean something triggered the search, but AGAIN, I want to see how it plays out. Until then, anything anyone says is speculation.
 
What contention exactly? I'm not interested in getting into a "whatabout" conversation with you. Hillary was investigated. Now Trump is being investigated.
Your contention that the professor's piece is not an amazing retort to you, HC and any others who do not agree that the way in which "Berger and Mrs. Clinton were treated is highly relevant in determining whether Mr. Trump is being subjected to a double standard of justice."

If you are not contending that, then sorry I misunderstood you and please indicate you agree with the Professor.
 
You don't think that the lowest level lawyer on Trumps team still isn't acutely aware of what he can/can't get away with and would advise him of those options and consequences? I mean, I know you only listen to the morons on MSNBC but stil.....

And as far as Trump being a bad businessman, he's the worst billionaire I know of.
You are so far enamored by Chump's so called business prowess that you clearly have not paid attention to how this man works. Chump runs his businesses, the presidency was no different, like an organized crime boss. There are White House lawyers whose job is to advise the president of what he can or cannot do legally among other things. Then there are lawyers that he deals with like Guiliani, the Dominion election machine chick, Cohen early on that pretty much act as what the organized crime folks call consiglieres. These are the slimy lawyers that advise the crime bosses, in this case, President Chump. This is why from day one of his presidency there was a lot of chaos in the White House. Also, one of the reasons why there was so much turnover in the administration. He required them to be loyal and pushed them to break the law. When they did not, to their credit they resigned. The bottom line is that Chump will do stuff over the edge or right at the edge. Perhaps the White House lawyers advised him that he cannot take these documents to his Florida home. However, most likely Chump proceeded to listen to his "consiglieres". As a result, he has his home raided by the feds.
 
OK, you say let it play out, I agree.

Do you think Trump is holding top secret classified documents at his personal residence?

I think they'll find some documents and the fight will be over whether they were classified/declassified, whether Trump had the right to possess them. But, they won't find anything related to nuke launch codes, military secrets, etc. (like the dems are hoping and praying for).

But, what do you think they'll find?
Well …

BTW, if Trump is holding any documents the government wants that were created for him or by him as President, he has to give them back. If DeSantis wins in 2024 and wants Biden’s notes on conversations with senators on passing the Inflation thing or the Afghanistan exit, he will have to give them up too.

 
You are so far enamored by Chump's so called business prowess that you clearly have not paid attention to how this man works. Chump runs his businesses, the presidency was no different, like an organized crime boss. There are White House lawyers whose job is to advise the president of what he can or cannot do legally among other things. Then there are lawyers that he deals with like Guiliani, the Dominion election machine chick, Cohen early on that pretty much act as what the organized crime folks call consiglieres. These are the slimy lawyers that advise the crime bosses, in this case, President Chump. This is why from day one of his presidency there was a lot of chaos in the White House. Also, one of the reasons why there was so much turnover in the administration. He required them to be loyal and pushed them to break the law. When they did not, to their credit they resigned. The bottom line is that Chump will do stuff over the edge or right at the edge. Perhaps the White House lawyers advised him that he cannot take these documents to his Florida home. However, most likely Chump proceeded to listen to his "consiglieres". As a result, he has his home raided by the feds.
what laws has Trump broken?
What laws did he push his administration to break?
What has he been convicted of? (I'll be waiting for your answer).

Trump is a great businessman because he knows what boundaries he can push and what he can't. He knows what risks are worth taking and what aren't. He knows how to work the legal and financial systems to his advantage as any smart businessman does (yes, including using bankruptcy and law to his advantage). And he's smart enough to hire a really good legal team to watch his back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tearsforfears
Well …

BTW, if Trump is holding any documents the government wants that were created for him or by him as President, he has to give them back. If DeSantis wins in 2024 and wants Biden’s notes on conversations with senators on passing the Inflation thing or the Afghanistan exit, he will have to give them up too.

Strzok? Yeh, he's a reliable source....

On August 10, 2018, David Bowdich, the FBI deputy director, fired Strzok for the anti-Trump text messages after the FBI's employee disciplinary office recommended Strzok be suspended for 60 days.[2] On August 6, 2019, Strzok filed a wrongful termination suit against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, asking to be reinstated and awarded back pay. He asserted in the suit that his text messages were "protected political speech," and that his termination violated the First Amendment.[18] In September 2020, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt published Strzok's book, Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump,[19] which became a New York Times and Washington Post bestseller.[20][21]
 
You don't think that the lowest level lawyer on Trumps team still isn't acutely aware of what he can/can't get away with and would advise him of those options and consequences? I mean, I know you only listen to the morons on MSNBC but stil.....

And as far as Trump being a bad businessman, he's the worst billionaire I know of.
You actually think trump listens to those around him.......that he doesn't think he knows more than they do?

Yeah he has at times......but it's crystal clear after all these years that he regularly listens to those who tell him what he wants to hear, he surrounds himself with yes men, and he thinks he knows more than his experts.

His entire WH, including his lawyers, told him he lost the election. He still doesn't believe it. His AGs told him he couldnt do what he wanted for 4 years.....and refused to follow his instructions......so he fired them.

Earlier you said "He analyzes the options, calculates the outcomes, determines best case scenarios, looks at the P&L of his decisions. etc."

Are you serious? Analyzes and calculates? He's a bull in a china shop. He knows how to play to his base and understands getting people pissed off makes him popular.

He has Christina Bobb for a lawyer for Christ sake. Really good legal team? Rudy? He wants loyalists that will do what he says, even his lawyers.......but few are willing to work for him anymore.

Did his analysis and calculations tell him to change his story like 4 times since this started? A standing order that classified documents become declassified when they leave the WH?
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
Strzok? Yeh, he's a reliable source....

On August 10, 2018, David Bowdich, the FBI deputy director, fired Strzok for the anti-Trump text messages after the FBI's employee disciplinary office recommended Strzok be suspended for 60 days.[2] On August 6, 2019, Strzok filed a wrongful termination suit against the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, asking to be reinstated and awarded back pay. He asserted in the suit that his text messages were "protected political speech," and that his termination violated the First Amendment.[18] In September 2020, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt published Strzok's book, Compromised: Counterintelligence and the Threat of Donald J. Trump,[19] which became a New York Times and Washington Post bestseller.[20][21]
Did you watch the video? It was Kid Rock bragging about seeing stuff he probably shouldn’t see. Strzok had nothing to do with my comment.

Seriously … knowing everything we know about Trump, do you think it’s not possible (or likely) he likes to brag and show people stuff that he probably shouldn’t?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bethboilerfan
Your contention that the professor's piece is not an amazing retort to you, HC and any others who do not agree that the way in which "Berger and Mrs. Clinton were treated is highly relevant in determining whether Mr. Trump is being subjected to a double standard of justice."

If you are not contending that, then sorry I misunderstood you and please indicate you agree with the Professor.
My contention was that using an OPINION piece to support your own opinions doesn't really do much.

If the question generally is whether or not there should be double standards, I've said many times already that the answer to that is no. However, these situations, while similar, are not the same. There were different laws in place then vs. now. There are different people in charge of this investigation vs. that one. There appears to be a different level of risk and intentionality between the two events. You and others in this thread will clearly never agree with me on some of those points and that's fine.

What it boils down to is that I was happy to let the investigation into Clinton go on because what she did was wrong, just like I'm happy to let the investigation into Trump go on because what he did was wrong.
 
My contention was that using an OPINION piece to support your own opinions doesn't really do much.

If the question generally is whether or not there should be double standards, I've said many times already that the answer to that is no. However, these situations, while similar, are not the same. There were different laws in place then vs. now. There are different people in charge of this investigation vs. that one. There appears to be a different level of risk and intentionality between the two events. You and others in this thread will clearly never agree with me on some of those points and that's fine.

What it boils down to is that I was happy to let the investigation into Clinton go on because what she did was wrong, just like I'm happy to let the investigation into Trump go on because what he did was wrong.
Much too early to say what Trump did was wrong. Yet you are saying it.
 
What it boils down to is that I was happy to let the investigation into Clinton go on because what she did was wrong, just like I'm happy to let the investigation into Trump go on because what he did was wrong.
This is the part that blows my mind: jump through your ass to condemn Hillary... while also jumping through your ass to defend Trump... when only one of them was actually caught with highly classified compartmentalized information on their private property through a lawful, warranted probable cause search and seizure (NOT A RAID, as DeSantis said when he did the same exact thing 24 hours later).

Condemn them both. Treat them the same. Hillary was not worthy of a vote; neither is Trump. Hillary is not worthy of public office; neither is Trump.

Be consistent. It's simple.
 
Ok then, it’s obvious you don’t want to actually discuss the events that have occurred. You’ve made up your mind based upon what you believe has happened in the past and the media.

For the record, classification status of the documents is not even relevant for the charges cited in the warrant.

You live in an alternate world if you believe ‘its very clear Trump gave up documents as requested’.

Good luck on your solar decision. Sounds like a potentially good deal, but i will acknowledge i don’t know much about the value of farmland and what is a better long term ROI.
I really don't want to do the solar panel easement rental deal but currently I'm lookking at leasing to them part of my non irrigated farm ground. I get $250/acre for irrigatd and $150/acre non irrigated.
They are offering 1000/acre with a 6% increase for 30 years renewable for 60 years.
Since I retired from farming 9 years ago my cash rent has pretty much stagnated.
It will benefit my kids and grandkids.

And I don't know who or what to believe.
I'm very concerned about the Country currently.
This liberal spending is rediculous, it seems the attack on anyone associated with Trump is non stop.
And as much as Trump has been investigated he has yet to be found guilty of anyting.
Schiff and Pelosi lied for 4 years about Russia and Ukraine.
Joe lies about knowing anyting about his families over seas dealings while they crank in 10's of millions of dollars from Russia, China and Ukraine.
Biden's policies are killing this Country and all the Congress can do his hound Trump non stop.

FYI, I didn't vote for Trump the 1st time. I didn't vote for POTUS in the 2016 election for the first time in my life. I believed the Russian BS.
I hope Desantis gets the GOP nominee but if it is Trump I'll vote for him a second time.
 
You are so far enamored by Chump's so called business prowess that you clearly have not paid attention to how this man works. Chump runs his businesses, the presidency was no different, like an organized crime boss. There are White House lawyers whose job is to advise the president of what he can or cannot do legally among other things. Then there are lawyers that he deals with like Guiliani, the Dominion election machine chick, Cohen early on that pretty much act as what the organized crime folks call consiglieres. These are the slimy lawyers that advise the crime bosses, in this case, President Chump. This is why from day one of his presidency there was a lot of chaos in the White House. Also, one of the reasons why there was so much turnover in the administration. He required them to be loyal and pushed them to break the law. When they did not, to their credit they resigned. The bottom line is that Chump will do stuff over the edge or right at the edge. Perhaps the White House lawyers advised him that he cannot take these documents to his Florida home. However, most likely Chump proceeded to listen to his "consiglieres". As a result, he has his home raided by the feds.
Wow you managed to type chump 5 times in that response.

How is you day going chump?
 
This is how it happens. Uniformed, lack of critical thinking, complete partisanship. Wow.

"I'll believe Trump."

That's all you had to say.
And you can believe Schiff and Pelosi.
You can believe CNN and MSNBC.
Who has been proven liars and who was right on Russian, Ukraine, China and the Hunter lap top???
 
ADVERTISEMENT