The leading Republican candidate and potential leader of the free world has been indicted for 91 felony counts?
You have not read the indictment describing a ton of potential felonies by the far and away leading major party presidential candidate, and yet you constantly comment with your takes on the country's current and future leadership.
Okay; sure. But this is the thread for commenting on this subject, ya know.
That's a lot of 'potential' felonies.
The republicans are the ones that are imprisoned. The republicans that dare to go against that MAGA cult BS are labeled RINOs. That is kinda sad. Liz Cheney, one of the most conservative in Congress lost her re-election. VP Mike Pence left the race because he pissed off the MAGA fools on Jan 6.
I think the 18 U.S.C. § 241 charges are the most serious, though in my opinion will not contain the most descriptive witness testimony for the public narrative. That's in the J6 indictment. I think that the classified docs case is less horrendous and as you would say, "serious" but that indictment likely contains very, very high likelihood of conviction. The Georgia case is really bad news for Trump too - it's in real part a variation of the federal J6 case imo.
Would you say someone is imprisoned if he still supports a president who call adult black males "boy"?
And you've already said repeatedly that "The republicans are the ones that are imprisoned."
Agree about 30% of Rs are imprisoned.
When I learned that the prosecutor is the same hack whose politically motivated conviction against Gov. McDonnell was overturned by an 8-0 SC ruling, it became clear what is going here. The SC said in that 8-0 decision:
Oh. That’s very disappointing.
Thanks for the laugh. You are confusing it with another case that Smith bungled, against John Edwards for campaign finance violations.
I made my choice. Not worth the time to read them until and unless Trump wins the Repub nomination - and by then they may be thrown out.
I am only blaming Smith for his past bungling and rebuke by the SC -- but based on that, I have decided it is not worth my time to read his indictments. It is like you and Bob with your extended posts and rants. I know from experience it is not worth the time to read the long ones.
That's a lazy excuse for not reading; you deduced that something you haven't read is a "persecution" and are thereby admitting that you draw uniformed conclusions. That's kinda sad.
I "deduced" it from past actions of the DOJ, just as I deduced from reading a few of your longer posts that it is not worth the time. Sorry if that hurts your feelings.
As a Christian, do you favor the heartbeat laws set up by some states, or are you completely against abortion?
I don’t know what the heartbeat laws are. Never heard of them. But I am against abortion with the exception of rape or incest.
Your view is a common view held by those considered pro-life. However, if you hold the view that abortion is murder of an innocent human being which I believe is also very common for those considered pro-life, why is it not murder in cases of rape or incest? It is still an innocent life being taken. Oh, I understand how the comfortless of such a situation is revolting, but it is still an innocent life. In a way that innocent life value is on a spectrum of uncomfortable conditions for nine months while the abortion people endure typically uncomfortable conditions of shorter durations. Personally, I can’t find logic for cases of rape or incest exceptions. Nobody has to answer any of this…just something to ponder perhaps.
Your position is strongly at odds with the dem party you always vote for, right?
I could get on board with that. Here's the issue though. There's be a massive uptick in reported rapes and incest incidents.
That’s funny. The capital T. Anyhow, there are other issues I care about. I evolved on the abortion issue. Years ago I was pro-choice.
babylonbee.com
