https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-16fe-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html?asdfk
You can't make this stuff up.
You can't make this stuff up.
so how many people did this get killed? How many refugees did this create? How many tax payers were harmed? lol...non story from 25 years ago. Is this any worse than having your press secretary lie to everyone for you?https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-16fe-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html?asdfk
You can't make this stuff up.
so how many people did this get killed? How many refugees did this create? How many tax payers were harmed? lol...non story from 25 years ago. Is this any worse than having your press secretary lie to everyone for you?
It's not "too much", but there's no substance here. He wasn't an elected official. He was under no obligation to say anything to the press. He can troll them all he wants. And if this indicates he has a screw loose, then what do all of Hillary's deceptions indicate about her?I'm sure you think it's a non-story. I think it's indicative of a guy who's got a screw loose.
I also think it funny your talking point, and his too apparently, is that stuff from 25 years ago is too much considering he's going to spend a large portion of this campaign talking about various allegations dealing with the Clintons from 25 years ago.
Well feel free to list all the "deceptions" you think Hillary has done, but it's non-responsive to this thread.It's not "too much", but there's no substance here. He wasn't an elected official. He was under no obligation to say anything to the press. He can troll them all he wants. And if this indicates he has a screw loose, then what do all of Hillary's deceptions indicate about her?
yeah...that's what I thought.Well feel free to list all the "deceptions" you think Hillary has done, but it's non-responsive to this thread.
Good, I'm glad you agree it's pretty silly to respond to Trump issues with, oh yeah, well what about Hillary doing something unrelated??yeah...that's what I thought.
It's surreal, not just that Trump would act like this, but that this is who HC will be running against. WWE surreal, in that people take it seriously. Hillary, f'in, Clinton v Doanld, f'in, Trump, God bless America, please!It gets weirder. I don't know why he's denying this instead of just saying, yeah I was being a goof and playing a joke, no biggie.
http://gawker.com/line-mysteriously-goes-dead-when-washington-post-report-1776578381
Here's 13 minutes worth:Well feel free to list all the "deceptions" you think Hillary has done, but it's non-responsive to this thread.
I'm sure you think it's a non-story. I think it's indicative of a guy who's got a screw loose.
I also think it funny your talking point, and his too apparently, is that stuff from 25 years ago is too much considering he's going to spend a large portion of this campaign talking about various allegations dealing with the Clintons from 25 years ago.
I'm sure you think it's a non-story. I think it's indicative of a guy who's got a screw loose.
I also think it funny your talking point, and his too apparently, is that stuff from 25 years ago is too much considering he's going to spend a large portion of this campaign talking about various allegations dealing with the Clintons from 25 years ago.
first, not actually 13 minutes of Hillary lying...you have Bill in there, you have an SNL skit in there, at one portion you just have her laughing at who knows what question.Here's 13 minutes worth:
She's such an awful politician that she just might lose to a complete douche bag hack like Trump.
Here's 13 minutes worth:
She's such an awful politician that she just might lose to a complete douche bag hack like Trump.
first, not actually 13 minutes of Hillary lying...you have Bill in there, you have an SNL skit in there, at one portion you just have her laughing at who knows what question.
second you've got Benghazi hearings? Really? She ate that panel for dinner.
You've got a few flip flops for sure, gay marriage for one (of course nearly the whole damn country has flipped on gay marriage from the 90s til now except for the far socially left).
But Trump was supposed to be different yes? He was supposed to be the guy who said what he meant, told it like it is, never wavered, not politically correct.
That's the whole damn reason for his candidacy. And now it's "everything is negotiable." If that's no longer the reason for his candidacy, then sign me up for the regular politician who isn't bat-crap crazy.
One thing they have in common is they both gravy-trained off someone else's success to get where they are.Since we are in an election year and you are pointing out flaws in Trump it stands to reason that you are in the HRC camp. IMO that opens this conversation to comments and observations about her too.
The fact is we have to choose, it appears, between two less than perfect candidates. One has little political experience but major success in Business and carries himself with extreme arrogance. The other is part of an establishment that has done little to nothing for this country in 8 years (my opinion). She is corrupt to the core and has a track record that demonstrates that she has little interest in anything except furthering her own stature and wealth (my opinion).
Sooo, we have some really great options. For me I will vote for anyone other than the establishment,...anyone.