ADVERTISEMENT

Trump's Alter Ego

so how many people did this get killed? How many refugees did this create? How many tax payers were harmed? lol...non story from 25 years ago. Is this any worse than having your press secretary lie to everyone for you?

I'm sure you think it's a non-story. I think it's indicative of a guy who's got a screw loose.

I also think it funny your talking point, and his too apparently, is that stuff from 25 years ago is too much considering he's going to spend a large portion of this campaign talking about various allegations dealing with the Clintons from 25 years ago.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure you think it's a non-story. I think it's indicative of a guy who's got a screw loose.

I also think it funny your talking point, and his too apparently, is that stuff from 25 years ago is too much considering he's going to spend a large portion of this campaign talking about various allegations dealing with the Clintons from 25 years ago.
It's not "too much", but there's no substance here. He wasn't an elected official. He was under no obligation to say anything to the press. He can troll them all he wants. And if this indicates he has a screw loose, then what do all of Hillary's deceptions indicate about her?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purdue97
It's not "too much", but there's no substance here. He wasn't an elected official. He was under no obligation to say anything to the press. He can troll them all he wants. And if this indicates he has a screw loose, then what do all of Hillary's deceptions indicate about her?
Well feel free to list all the "deceptions" you think Hillary has done, but it's non-responsive to this thread.
 
yeah...that's what I thought.
Good, I'm glad you agree it's pretty silly to respond to Trump issues with, oh yeah, well what about Hillary doing something unrelated??

Just like it would be to do so in reverse.

See, we can all come to agreement sometimes.
 
Well feel free to list all the "deceptions" you think Hillary has done, but it's non-responsive to this thread.
Here's 13 minutes worth:



She's such an awful politician that she just might lose to a complete douche bag hack like Trump.
 
I'm sure you think it's a non-story. I think it's indicative of a guy who's got a screw loose.

I also think it funny your talking point, and his too apparently, is that stuff from 25 years ago is too much considering he's going to spend a large portion of this campaign talking about various allegations dealing with the Clintons from 25 years ago.

You would like it to be from 25 years ago. While problematic they(issues from 25 years ago) have been out in the news and tried. The issues Hilary has are largely from the last decade. Much of it in last 6-7 years.
 
Last edited:
I'm sure you think it's a non-story. I think it's indicative of a guy who's got a screw loose.

I also think it funny your talking point, and his too apparently, is that stuff from 25 years ago is too much considering he's going to spend a large portion of this campaign talking about various allegations dealing with the Clintons from 25 years ago.

You kill your own arguments with these type of posts. How the heck someone cares about a civilian screwing around with a reporter about his love life and ignores the issues with the Clinton foundation, her emails/server, and selling off US uranium(all much more recent) for private gain says it all.

That said, I think most of these politicians have screws loose
 
Last edited:
Here's 13 minutes worth:



She's such an awful politician that she just might lose to a complete douche bag hack like Trump.
first, not actually 13 minutes of Hillary lying...you have Bill in there, you have an SNL skit in there, at one portion you just have her laughing at who knows what question.
second you've got Benghazi hearings? Really? She ate that panel for dinner.
You've got a few flip flops for sure, gay marriage for one (of course nearly the whole damn country has flipped on gay marriage from the 90s til now except for the far socially left).

But Trump was supposed to be different yes? He was supposed to be the guy who said what he meant, told it like it is, never wavered, not politically correct.
That's the whole damn reason for his candidacy. And now it's "everything is negotiable." If that's no longer the reason for his candidacy, then sign me up for the regular politician who isn't bat-crap crazy.
 
first, not actually 13 minutes of Hillary lying...you have Bill in there, you have an SNL skit in there, at one portion you just have her laughing at who knows what question.
second you've got Benghazi hearings? Really? She ate that panel for dinner.
You've got a few flip flops for sure, gay marriage for one (of course nearly the whole damn country has flipped on gay marriage from the 90s til now except for the far socially left).

But Trump was supposed to be different yes? He was supposed to be the guy who said what he meant, told it like it is, never wavered, not politically correct.
That's the whole damn reason for his candidacy. And now it's "everything is negotiable." If that's no longer the reason for his candidacy, then sign me up for the regular politician who isn't bat-crap crazy.

Since we are in an election year and you are pointing out flaws in Trump it stands to reason that you are in the HRC camp. IMO that opens this conversation to comments and observations about her too.

The fact is we have to choose, it appears, between two less than perfect candidates. One has little political experience but major success in Business and carries himself with extreme arrogance. The other is part of an establishment that has done little to nothing for this country in 8 years (my opinion). She is corrupt to the core and has a track record that demonstrates that she has little interest in anything except furthering her own stature and wealth (my opinion).


Sooo, we have some really great options. For me I will vote for anyone other than the establishment,...anyone.
 
Since we are in an election year and you are pointing out flaws in Trump it stands to reason that you are in the HRC camp. IMO that opens this conversation to comments and observations about her too.

The fact is we have to choose, it appears, between two less than perfect candidates. One has little political experience but major success in Business and carries himself with extreme arrogance. The other is part of an establishment that has done little to nothing for this country in 8 years (my opinion). She is corrupt to the core and has a track record that demonstrates that she has little interest in anything except furthering her own stature and wealth (my opinion).


Sooo, we have some really great options. For me I will vote for anyone other than the establishment,...anyone.
One thing they have in common is they both gravy-trained off someone else's success to get where they are.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT