The Penn State game would fit the profile of our other losses pretty well. Reminds me alot of Iowa actually. Team we hammered at home earlier and has enough pride to come at us strong on their homecourt. I expect a great effort from them Tuesday.
Good thing Purdue will have about as many fans as PSU will. That place is dead.
I've been worried about this NW have for a couple weeks now.
The Penn State game would fit the profile of our other losses pretty well. Reminds me alot of Iowa actually. Team we hammered at home earlier and has enough pride to come at us strong on their homecourt. I expect a great effort from them Tuesday.
Toughest test may be the B10 tourney. Think that's a absolute must to win this year to garner some damn respect in CB. I'd be delighted going 6-1 rest of way and cutting down nets. It's Purdue's time to win that damn thing.
Good thing Purdue will have about as many fans as PSU will. That place is dead.
I've been worried about this NW have for a couple weeks now.
@ michigan
IU
Or @ northwestern
Always the NEXT one@ michigan
IU
Or @ northwestern
@ michigan
IU
Or @ northwestern
The next one...and the next.,..and the next. But IU will pull out every trick including tripping, punching, and whining because beating PU this year is their NIT tourney....albeit a one game contest.@ michigan
IU
Or @ northwestern
Destiny is in purdue's own hands. Can't ask for much more than that. They know if they win out they will be Big Ten champs. It all starts Tuesday with penn state.
Great point Sammy! When Purdue's opponent's. Get to 70 first or over 75 points we are normally in trouble.Toughest opponent is.......the Boilers themselves.
When you approach games based on playing to perfection... the opponent becomes yourself, and competing to the standard of perfection.
Personally, I have become impressed with the increase in Purdue's D .. however the because of the energy they're exerting.... their shooting is suffering. I really don't think we have not seen Purdue's best game yet....and unlike the excitement read on here I have not been as excited because of the flaws in their outside game. I am waiting for them to put it all together.... that perfect game. Let' hope we see it in late March!
That is the quickest way to lose any or all. ONE GAME AT A TIME. Penn St will NOT be easy either.@ michigan
IU
Or @ northwestern
That is the quickest way to lose any or all. ONE GAME AT A TIME. Penn St will NOT be easy either.
I had this exact same thought reading this thread (and others). Fan chatter about the remaining schedule and ease or difficulty of particular games could not have any less of an impact on the actual games. It's almost like the people that say that stuff are living in a fantasy world where they think they're part of the real team!Why would fans discussing the hardest remaining game have any outcome on how the team performs? Why would a poster listing their opinion on the remaining games be "the quickest way to lose any or all. ONE GAME AT A TIME."?
Honest question because I see posters on this board tell it to other posters all the time.
The Penn State game would fit the profile of our other losses pretty well. Reminds me alot of Iowa actually. Team we hammered at home earlier and has enough pride to come at us strong on their homecourt. I expect a great effort from them Tuesday.
I'm too lazy to look things up, but it feels like we've had many close games with PSU at their place. Tomorrow would be the most likely game to drop...
thanks chief, although you forgot the 78. Even when we had Big Dog, we only won by 7 up there. I was 4 rows behind our bench for that one. Another time I went up there when we had Miller and Austin and layed an egg and made Calvin Booth look like Bill Russell.Yes, and relatively low-scoring. Under CMP, Purdue is 6-4 @ the Tomb * (Bryce Jordan Center). Purdue didn't play there last year, so the last visit was the game where Kendall Stephens made a late three off of a missed free throw to force overtime, IIRC.
'15 84-77 (W) (OT)
'14 68-79 (L)
'13 58-49 (W)
'12 45-65 (L)
'11 83-68 (W)
'10 64-60 (W)
'09 64-67 (L)
'08 64-42 (W)
'07 69-59 (W)
'06 54-74 (L)
________________
* credit for coining the term goes to PaBoiler....
thanks chief, although you forgot the 78. Even when we had Big Dog, we only won by 7 up there. I was 4 rows behind our bench for that one. Another time I went up there when we had Miller and Austin and layed an egg and made Calvin Booth look like Bill Russell.
Calvin Booth, ugh. The fact he somehow managed to hang around the NBA for 10 years makes me believe Biggie AND Haas will be in the league for a while, although the game is different now.thanks chief, although you forgot the 78. Even when we had Big Dog, we only won by 7 up there. I was 4 rows behind our bench for that one. Another time I went up there when we had Miller and Austin and layed an egg and made Calvin Booth look like Bill Russell.
I had this exact same thought reading this thread (and others). Fan chatter about the remaining schedule and ease or difficulty of particular games could not have any less of an impact on the actual games. It's almost like the people that say that stuff are living in a fantasy world where they think they're part of the real team!
I mean, nobody is living in a bubble.
I guarantee you every article written about Purdue before the NCAA Tournament will talk about how fans are restless to win the first round game - there will be tremendous pressure and that's all the press will ask them.
I mean, nobody is living in a bubble.
***
Yes, there will be pressure to win an NCAA game. But that pressure will be because the "program" has failed to achieve a single tournament win in several years. And it's a program that should. It isn't because the fans irrationally expected the team to progress at tourney time. If the latter was the case, your argument would make more sense. But the fan expectations are rationale, so yes they support the media's line of question, but they aren't fanning its flames by any stretch. In the most recent years, the "program" has either not made the tourney or lost the opening game in near-bewildering fashion where the game looked to be W for Purdue. The fans didn't cause those outcomes, nor are they to blame for the media covering and/or inquiring about it. That's my take.
yes, Purdue did have a winning streak of winning the first round games but I think fans want to see more than that from this team. You have to take advantage of having an all American player on your team in Biggie. I say to raise the bar and hope to get to the Final 4. Winning only the opening round would be a shame.I'm not gonna get into a debate about NCAA Tournament. But Purdue had the longest first round winning streak in the nation I believe until 2 years ago. We lost as a #9 seed to an 8 seed. Last year's loss was disappointing, but Purdue has largely avoided those types of upsets under Painter. To act like it's a "problem" is pushing it.
yes, Purdue did have a winning streak of winning the first round games but I think fans want to see more than that from this team. You have to take advantage of having an all American player on your team in Biggie. I say to raise the bar and hope to get to the Final 4. Winning only the opening round would be a shame.