Stunning revelation from the rabid liberal NY Times Editorial Board

[Quix0te]

I have been reading the NY Times for years and I am shocked by what I am reading today. They published an op-ed by the Editorial Board entitled “A Big Idea to Solve America’s Immigration Mess.” Yes, they actually admit that there is a problem with our current immigration system! The Biden/Mayorkas/Harris border is NOT secure and our immigration system is a “mess.”

And here’s the really staggering admission. In the ninth paragraph in the gift link below, the NY Times Editorial Board says that illegal immigrants are here ”illegally”! Yes, that is the word they used! Not “undocumented”, they actually came right out and said the illegals are here illegally!

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/opinion/american-immigration-immigrants.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ok4.tfEE.tgbPjo3RwnJY&smid=url-share

 

[Riveting]

I have been reading the NY Times for years and I am shocked by what I am reading today. They published an op-ed by the Editorial Board entitled “A Big Idea to Solve America’s Immigration Mess.” Yes, they actually admit that there is a problem with our current immigration system! The Biden/Mayorkas/Harris border is NOT secure and our immigration system is a “mess.”

And here’s the really staggering admission. In the ninth paragraph in the gift link below, the NY Times Editorial Board says that illegal immigrants are here ”illegally”! Yes, that is the word they used! Not “undocumented”, they actually came right out and said the illegals are here illegally!

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/opinion/american-immigration-immigrants.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ok4.tfEE.tgbPjo3RwnJY&smid=url-share

Surprised at that admission...and that you read the NYT given its highly biased, inaccurate reporting, as reflected in this acknowledgement by the editorial board.

Given your long and admirable service to our nation, I am sure you have a good reason - but I cannot imagine what it might be. The crossword puzzle, perhaps?

 

[Quix0te]

Surprised at that admission...and that you read the NYT given its highly biased, inaccurate reporting, as reflected in this acknowledgement by the editorial board.

I subscribe online with the NY Times, Wall St Journal, Boston Globe and previously the Washington Post. I dropped the Post after I was permanently banned from the comments section. Here's the "racist" (that's what they told me) post that resulted in a permanent ban: "The only way to communicate with Democrats about illegal immigration is to load up a bus with illegals, drive them to a sanctuary city and drop them off in their new hometwown."

 

[Riveting]

I subscribe online with the NY Times, Wall St Journal, Boston Globe and previously the Washington Post. I dropped the Post after I was permanently banned from the comments section. Here's the "racist" (that's what they told me) post that resulted in a permanent ban: "The only way to communicate with Democrats about illegal immigration is to load up a bus with illegals, drive them to a sanctuary city and drop them off in their new hometwown."

DeSantis proved that with the lib hypocrites of Martha's Vineyard, who move them out within 48 hours.

WSJ is the real national newspaper, in my view.

 

[Quix0te]

WSJ is the real national newspaper, in my view.

I started my stock portfolio in 1981 and have been a WSJ reader since that time.