If we had been a team that only had a center-centered or drive-the-basket offense, then zoning might have helped Duke. Throw a zone at this Purdue team and they will bury in threes before you can get it back to man-to-man. When the announcer said Duke was showing zone, I told my wife that the game was over, and to watch Loyer, Furst, and company start shooting threes.
Maybe with this clear demonstration of the short coming of zone defense, we will have heard the last of that nonsense?
I think just the opposite. Listen to CMP in the post game presser. The zone did have an impact and the lead went down when they first put it on. Flow of our offense changed. They went to zone at the 15:51 mark. We had a 15 pt lead at the time. We proceeded to go 5 straight possessions without a point. Thankfully Duke couldn't score much either but by the 6th possession with a Furst rebound and basket the lead had been cut to 9.
You need to go back and watch that stretch of the 2nd half. If you don't think the zone had an impact then you are just being stubborn. Yes, we adapted eventually and Duke went ice cold for a long stretch to end the game. Because of that, I think some are forgetting that 4 minute stretch where the zone had an impact.
I will say it once again: Zone defense has a place in the college game. Your comment that "Throw a zone at this team and they will bury you in 3's before you can get back to Man to man" is factually wrong. We went 5 straight possessions without scoring a point. On the 6th possession it was a Furst put back that scored the basket.
I love this team and I'm thrilled with the way we are playing. But I think it's important to be factually correct when discussing a game. You're taking a beautiful win and trying to somehow twist that into justifying the hate for a zone defense. The facts don't support that.